Steven W. Hemelt , Brennan Mange , Samantha Raynor
{"title":"以HEART为例:关于加强咨询和高等教育进展的实验证据","authors":"Steven W. Hemelt , Brennan Mange , Samantha Raynor","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many students leave college after appreciable progress toward a degree. Growing curricular complexity, dwindling financial aid, and meager mid-college advising may contribute to late departure. In an experiment conducted with a public 4-year university, we study an enhanced advising intervention (HEART) that targets students at least halfway through college. HEART includes access to a trained advisor with a reduced caseload, easy-to-digest information on remaining financial aid and academic progress, and a modest grant structured as an incentive over two terms. On average, although HEART generated additional and longer meetings between students and advisors, in which they discussed a wider array of topics than their counterparts in the control group, we fail to detect an appreciable effect of HEART on college completion. However, we find suggestive evidence of different effects by gender, with HEART hastening college completion among male students, and perhaps encouraging female students to augment their program of study. We find limited evidence of beneficial effects on postsecondary outcomes for other pre-specified subgroups, including students grouped by baseline propensity to complete college in 5 years. These findings indicate that medium-touch, mid-college interventions may be insufficient to boost college completion, at least markedly, while also offering insights into differences by student gender in responses to advising-heavy interventions in college.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102652"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Take HEART: Experimental evidence on enhanced advising and postsecondary progress\",\"authors\":\"Steven W. Hemelt , Brennan Mange , Samantha Raynor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many students leave college after appreciable progress toward a degree. Growing curricular complexity, dwindling financial aid, and meager mid-college advising may contribute to late departure. In an experiment conducted with a public 4-year university, we study an enhanced advising intervention (HEART) that targets students at least halfway through college. HEART includes access to a trained advisor with a reduced caseload, easy-to-digest information on remaining financial aid and academic progress, and a modest grant structured as an incentive over two terms. On average, although HEART generated additional and longer meetings between students and advisors, in which they discussed a wider array of topics than their counterparts in the control group, we fail to detect an appreciable effect of HEART on college completion. However, we find suggestive evidence of different effects by gender, with HEART hastening college completion among male students, and perhaps encouraging female students to augment their program of study. We find limited evidence of beneficial effects on postsecondary outcomes for other pre-specified subgroups, including students grouped by baseline propensity to complete college in 5 years. These findings indicate that medium-touch, mid-college interventions may be insufficient to boost college completion, at least markedly, while also offering insights into differences by student gender in responses to advising-heavy interventions in college.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775725000329\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775725000329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Take HEART: Experimental evidence on enhanced advising and postsecondary progress
Many students leave college after appreciable progress toward a degree. Growing curricular complexity, dwindling financial aid, and meager mid-college advising may contribute to late departure. In an experiment conducted with a public 4-year university, we study an enhanced advising intervention (HEART) that targets students at least halfway through college. HEART includes access to a trained advisor with a reduced caseload, easy-to-digest information on remaining financial aid and academic progress, and a modest grant structured as an incentive over two terms. On average, although HEART generated additional and longer meetings between students and advisors, in which they discussed a wider array of topics than their counterparts in the control group, we fail to detect an appreciable effect of HEART on college completion. However, we find suggestive evidence of different effects by gender, with HEART hastening college completion among male students, and perhaps encouraging female students to augment their program of study. We find limited evidence of beneficial effects on postsecondary outcomes for other pre-specified subgroups, including students grouped by baseline propensity to complete college in 5 years. These findings indicate that medium-touch, mid-college interventions may be insufficient to boost college completion, at least markedly, while also offering insights into differences by student gender in responses to advising-heavy interventions in college.
期刊介绍:
Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.