Rhiannon Macefield , Laura Mandefield , Jane M. Blazeby , Caroline Fairhurst , Kalpita Baird , Catherine Arundel , Ian Chetter , Belen Corbacho Martin , Catherine Hewitt , Athanasios Gkekas , Andrew Mott , Dr Pedro Saramago Goncalves , Samantha Swan , David Torgerson , Jacqueline Wilkinson , Sabeen Zahra , Stephen Dixon , Josie Hatfield , Angela Oswald , Jo Dumville , E. Packer
{"title":"Bluebelle伤口愈合问卷(WHQ)用于评估伤口愈合手术部位感染的修改和验证","authors":"Rhiannon Macefield , Laura Mandefield , Jane M. Blazeby , Caroline Fairhurst , Kalpita Baird , Catherine Arundel , Ian Chetter , Belen Corbacho Martin , Catherine Hewitt , Athanasios Gkekas , Andrew Mott , Dr Pedro Saramago Goncalves , Samantha Swan , David Torgerson , Jacqueline Wilkinson , Sabeen Zahra , Stephen Dixon , Josie Hatfield , Angela Oswald , Jo Dumville , E. Packer","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgical wounds healing by secondary intention are common. Healing is often complicated by surgical site infection (SSI). SSI assessment is important to guide treatment but existing methods generally require in-person assessment, making them resource intensive. A validated patient-reported SSI outcome measure may be useful to overcome this limitation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To modify and validate the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) for wounds healing by secondary intention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 18-item Bluebelle WHQ developed for wounds healing by primary intention was modified to make it applicable to secondary healing wounds. Testing was performed as part of the SWHSI-2 randomised trial assessing negative pressure wound dressings versus standard care. Participants completed the WHQ at five timepoints; in-person (baseline, post-healing) and by post (3, 6, 12 months). A reference SSI assessment was performed by a research nurse at the time of wound healing. Acceptability and criterion validity (ability of the Bluebelle WHQ to discriminate between SSI/no SSI) were explored by examining questionnaire return rates, levels of missing data and total score sensitivity/specificity values (receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline in-person questionnaire return rates were highest (672/686; 98 %), with postal return rates of 428/615 (68.5 %), 274/416 (65.9 %) and 186/296 (62.8 %) at follow up points. Overall, low levels of item-missing data were observed with few problems completing the questionnaire reported. Ability to discriminate between SSI/no SSI was good (Area under ROC = 0.796).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The modified Bluebelle WHQ is a valuable tool for post-discharge assessment of wounds healing by secondary intention. It is recommended for use in research and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 100889"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modification and validation of the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) for assessing surgical site infection in wounds healing by secondary intention\",\"authors\":\"Rhiannon Macefield , Laura Mandefield , Jane M. Blazeby , Caroline Fairhurst , Kalpita Baird , Catherine Arundel , Ian Chetter , Belen Corbacho Martin , Catherine Hewitt , Athanasios Gkekas , Andrew Mott , Dr Pedro Saramago Goncalves , Samantha Swan , David Torgerson , Jacqueline Wilkinson , Sabeen Zahra , Stephen Dixon , Josie Hatfield , Angela Oswald , Jo Dumville , E. Packer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgical wounds healing by secondary intention are common. Healing is often complicated by surgical site infection (SSI). SSI assessment is important to guide treatment but existing methods generally require in-person assessment, making them resource intensive. A validated patient-reported SSI outcome measure may be useful to overcome this limitation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To modify and validate the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) for wounds healing by secondary intention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 18-item Bluebelle WHQ developed for wounds healing by primary intention was modified to make it applicable to secondary healing wounds. Testing was performed as part of the SWHSI-2 randomised trial assessing negative pressure wound dressings versus standard care. Participants completed the WHQ at five timepoints; in-person (baseline, post-healing) and by post (3, 6, 12 months). A reference SSI assessment was performed by a research nurse at the time of wound healing. Acceptability and criterion validity (ability of the Bluebelle WHQ to discriminate between SSI/no SSI) were explored by examining questionnaire return rates, levels of missing data and total score sensitivity/specificity values (receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline in-person questionnaire return rates were highest (672/686; 98 %), with postal return rates of 428/615 (68.5 %), 274/416 (65.9 %) and 186/296 (62.8 %) at follow up points. Overall, low levels of item-missing data were observed with few problems completing the questionnaire reported. Ability to discriminate between SSI/no SSI was good (Area under ROC = 0.796).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The modified Bluebelle WHQ is a valuable tool for post-discharge assessment of wounds healing by secondary intention. It is recommended for use in research and clinical practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of tissue viability\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of tissue viability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X25000373\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X25000373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modification and validation of the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) for assessing surgical site infection in wounds healing by secondary intention
Background
Surgical wounds healing by secondary intention are common. Healing is often complicated by surgical site infection (SSI). SSI assessment is important to guide treatment but existing methods generally require in-person assessment, making them resource intensive. A validated patient-reported SSI outcome measure may be useful to overcome this limitation.
Aim
To modify and validate the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) for wounds healing by secondary intention.
Methods
The 18-item Bluebelle WHQ developed for wounds healing by primary intention was modified to make it applicable to secondary healing wounds. Testing was performed as part of the SWHSI-2 randomised trial assessing negative pressure wound dressings versus standard care. Participants completed the WHQ at five timepoints; in-person (baseline, post-healing) and by post (3, 6, 12 months). A reference SSI assessment was performed by a research nurse at the time of wound healing. Acceptability and criterion validity (ability of the Bluebelle WHQ to discriminate between SSI/no SSI) were explored by examining questionnaire return rates, levels of missing data and total score sensitivity/specificity values (receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)).
Results
Baseline in-person questionnaire return rates were highest (672/686; 98 %), with postal return rates of 428/615 (68.5 %), 274/416 (65.9 %) and 186/296 (62.8 %) at follow up points. Overall, low levels of item-missing data were observed with few problems completing the questionnaire reported. Ability to discriminate between SSI/no SSI was good (Area under ROC = 0.796).
Conclusion
The modified Bluebelle WHQ is a valuable tool for post-discharge assessment of wounds healing by secondary intention. It is recommended for use in research and clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management.
The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.