Tom Wilsgaard PhD , Wayne Rosamond PhD , Henrik Schirmer MD, PhD , Haakon Lindekleiv MD, PhD , Zachi I. Attia PhD , Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MSc, MBA , David A. Leon PhD , Olena Iakunchykova PhD
{"title":"来自心电图的一种新的衰老生物标志物提高了心血管疾病发生的风险预测","authors":"Tom Wilsgaard PhD , Wayne Rosamond PhD , Henrik Schirmer MD, PhD , Haakon Lindekleiv MD, PhD , Zachi I. Attia PhD , Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MSc, MBA , David A. Leon PhD , Olena Iakunchykova PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A biomarker of cardiovascular aging, derived from a deep learning algorithm applied to digitized 12-lead electrocardiograms, has recently been introduced. This biomarker, δ-age, is defined as the difference between predicted electrocardiogram age and chronological age.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the potential value of δ-age in enhancing the performance of primary prevention models for cardiovascular disease that incorporate traditional cardiovascular risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cohort study, we included 7,108 men and women from the Norwegian Tromsø Study in 2015 to 16, with follow-up through 2021 for incident fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and hemorrhagic or cerebral stroke. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models, Harrell's concordance statistic (C-index), and the net reclassification improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During a median follow-up of 5.9 years, we observed 155 cases of MI and 141 strokes. In men and women combined,HR per SD increment in δ-age, after adjustment for traditional risk factors included in the Norwegian risk model for acute cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction (NORRISK 2) score, was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.09-1.41) for the combined outcome, with similar HRs for MI and stroke. In men, the HR was significant for MI and in women for stroke. The C-index increased significantly but modestly when δ-age was added to a model with traditional risk factors. The net reclassification improvement was 26.0% (95% CI: 13.3%-38.1%) for the combined outcome, 17.5% (95% CI: 0.6%-33.5%) for MI, and 37.2% (95% CI: 20.1%-53.0%) for stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Incorporating δ-age into primary prevention risk prediction models significantly improved performance beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors for the combined outcome and separately for MI and stroke.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 101764"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Biomarker of Aging Derived From Electrocardiograms Improves Risk Prediction of Incident Cardiovascular Disease\",\"authors\":\"Tom Wilsgaard PhD , Wayne Rosamond PhD , Henrik Schirmer MD, PhD , Haakon Lindekleiv MD, PhD , Zachi I. Attia PhD , Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MSc, MBA , David A. Leon PhD , Olena Iakunchykova PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A biomarker of cardiovascular aging, derived from a deep learning algorithm applied to digitized 12-lead electrocardiograms, has recently been introduced. This biomarker, δ-age, is defined as the difference between predicted electrocardiogram age and chronological age.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the potential value of δ-age in enhancing the performance of primary prevention models for cardiovascular disease that incorporate traditional cardiovascular risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cohort study, we included 7,108 men and women from the Norwegian Tromsø Study in 2015 to 16, with follow-up through 2021 for incident fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and hemorrhagic or cerebral stroke. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models, Harrell's concordance statistic (C-index), and the net reclassification improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During a median follow-up of 5.9 years, we observed 155 cases of MI and 141 strokes. In men and women combined,HR per SD increment in δ-age, after adjustment for traditional risk factors included in the Norwegian risk model for acute cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction (NORRISK 2) score, was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.09-1.41) for the combined outcome, with similar HRs for MI and stroke. In men, the HR was significant for MI and in women for stroke. The C-index increased significantly but modestly when δ-age was added to a model with traditional risk factors. The net reclassification improvement was 26.0% (95% CI: 13.3%-38.1%) for the combined outcome, 17.5% (95% CI: 0.6%-33.5%) for MI, and 37.2% (95% CI: 20.1%-53.0%) for stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Incorporating δ-age into primary prevention risk prediction models significantly improved performance beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors for the combined outcome and separately for MI and stroke.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC advances\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25001814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25001814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A New Biomarker of Aging Derived From Electrocardiograms Improves Risk Prediction of Incident Cardiovascular Disease
Background
A biomarker of cardiovascular aging, derived from a deep learning algorithm applied to digitized 12-lead electrocardiograms, has recently been introduced. This biomarker, δ-age, is defined as the difference between predicted electrocardiogram age and chronological age.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to assess the potential value of δ-age in enhancing the performance of primary prevention models for cardiovascular disease that incorporate traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
Methods
In this cohort study, we included 7,108 men and women from the Norwegian Tromsø Study in 2015 to 16, with follow-up through 2021 for incident fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and hemorrhagic or cerebral stroke. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models, Harrell's concordance statistic (C-index), and the net reclassification improvement.
Results
During a median follow-up of 5.9 years, we observed 155 cases of MI and 141 strokes. In men and women combined,HR per SD increment in δ-age, after adjustment for traditional risk factors included in the Norwegian risk model for acute cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction (NORRISK 2) score, was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.09-1.41) for the combined outcome, with similar HRs for MI and stroke. In men, the HR was significant for MI and in women for stroke. The C-index increased significantly but modestly when δ-age was added to a model with traditional risk factors. The net reclassification improvement was 26.0% (95% CI: 13.3%-38.1%) for the combined outcome, 17.5% (95% CI: 0.6%-33.5%) for MI, and 37.2% (95% CI: 20.1%-53.0%) for stroke.
Conclusions
Incorporating δ-age into primary prevention risk prediction models significantly improved performance beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors for the combined outcome and separately for MI and stroke.