2000-2020年“一带一路”干旱区沙漠化:土地退化中性框架下的评估

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zhijia Zheng , Yue Dong , Hao Zhan , Jinsongdi Yu
{"title":"2000-2020年“一带一路”干旱区沙漠化:土地退化中性框架下的评估","authors":"Zhijia Zheng ,&nbsp;Yue Dong ,&nbsp;Hao Zhan ,&nbsp;Jinsongdi Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sandy desertification currently poses a severe environmental challenge, hindering the socio-economic development of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) drylands. However, due to incomplete evaluation systems and unclear driving mechanisms, research on sandy desertification in the BRI drylands remains limited. To address this issue, this study followed the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) framework and constructed a new index, called sandy desertification assessment index (SDAI). Based on SDAI, this study assessed the status, evolution, and driving mechanisms of sandy desertification during 2000–2020. The findings are as follows: (1) The year 2006 was identified as the turning point for light and moderate sandy desertification land, whereafter the areas of light sandy desertification increased while the areas of moderate sandy desertification decreased. (2) The transformation patterns of sandy desertification levels were similar in two decades (i.e., 2000–2010 and 2010–2020), with slight differences in conversion areas. (3) The changing trends exhibit regional variability. Notably, reversal was predominantly observed in China, Mongolia, and India, whereas intensification was concentrated in Central Asia. (4) Various factors exerted differing influences on sandy desertification, with annual cumulative precipitation, human footprint, and gross domestic product (GDP) being particularly significant. This study will provide crucial guidance for formulating prevention and control strategies in the BRI drylands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113571"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sandy desertification in the Belt and Road Initiative drylands during 2000–2020: Assessment under the Land Degradation Neutrality framework\",\"authors\":\"Zhijia Zheng ,&nbsp;Yue Dong ,&nbsp;Hao Zhan ,&nbsp;Jinsongdi Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sandy desertification currently poses a severe environmental challenge, hindering the socio-economic development of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) drylands. However, due to incomplete evaluation systems and unclear driving mechanisms, research on sandy desertification in the BRI drylands remains limited. To address this issue, this study followed the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) framework and constructed a new index, called sandy desertification assessment index (SDAI). Based on SDAI, this study assessed the status, evolution, and driving mechanisms of sandy desertification during 2000–2020. The findings are as follows: (1) The year 2006 was identified as the turning point for light and moderate sandy desertification land, whereafter the areas of light sandy desertification increased while the areas of moderate sandy desertification decreased. (2) The transformation patterns of sandy desertification levels were similar in two decades (i.e., 2000–2010 and 2010–2020), with slight differences in conversion areas. (3) The changing trends exhibit regional variability. Notably, reversal was predominantly observed in China, Mongolia, and India, whereas intensification was concentrated in Central Asia. (4) Various factors exerted differing influences on sandy desertification, with annual cumulative precipitation, human footprint, and gross domestic product (GDP) being particularly significant. This study will provide crucial guidance for formulating prevention and control strategies in the BRI drylands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

荒漠化是当前严峻的环境挑战,阻碍了“一带一路”旱地的社会经济发展。然而,由于评价体系不完善、驱动机制不明确,对“一带一路”干旱区沙漠化的研究仍然有限。为了解决这一问题,本研究遵循土地退化中性(LDN)框架,构建了沙地沙漠化评价指数(SDAI)。基于SDAI,对2000-2020年沙化现状、演变及驱动机制进行了评价。结果表明:①2006年是我国轻、中度沙化土地的拐点,轻沙化土地面积增加,中度沙化土地面积减少;(2) 2000-2010年和2010-2020年2个a期内,沙漠化程度的变化格局基本相似,但变化区域差异不大。(3)变化趋势呈现区域差异。值得注意的是,反转主要发生在中国、蒙古和印度,而强化则集中在中亚。(4)不同因素对沙漠化的影响不同,年累积降水量、人类足迹和国内生产总值(GDP)的影响尤为显著。该研究将为“一带一路”旱地防控战略的制定提供重要指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sandy desertification in the Belt and Road Initiative drylands during 2000–2020: Assessment under the Land Degradation Neutrality framework
Sandy desertification currently poses a severe environmental challenge, hindering the socio-economic development of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) drylands. However, due to incomplete evaluation systems and unclear driving mechanisms, research on sandy desertification in the BRI drylands remains limited. To address this issue, this study followed the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) framework and constructed a new index, called sandy desertification assessment index (SDAI). Based on SDAI, this study assessed the status, evolution, and driving mechanisms of sandy desertification during 2000–2020. The findings are as follows: (1) The year 2006 was identified as the turning point for light and moderate sandy desertification land, whereafter the areas of light sandy desertification increased while the areas of moderate sandy desertification decreased. (2) The transformation patterns of sandy desertification levels were similar in two decades (i.e., 2000–2010 and 2010–2020), with slight differences in conversion areas. (3) The changing trends exhibit regional variability. Notably, reversal was predominantly observed in China, Mongolia, and India, whereas intensification was concentrated in Central Asia. (4) Various factors exerted differing influences on sandy desertification, with annual cumulative precipitation, human footprint, and gross domestic product (GDP) being particularly significant. This study will provide crucial guidance for formulating prevention and control strategies in the BRI drylands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信