{"title":"2000-2020年“一带一路”干旱区沙漠化:土地退化中性框架下的评估","authors":"Zhijia Zheng , Yue Dong , Hao Zhan , Jinsongdi Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sandy desertification currently poses a severe environmental challenge, hindering the socio-economic development of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) drylands. However, due to incomplete evaluation systems and unclear driving mechanisms, research on sandy desertification in the BRI drylands remains limited. To address this issue, this study followed the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) framework and constructed a new index, called sandy desertification assessment index (SDAI). Based on SDAI, this study assessed the status, evolution, and driving mechanisms of sandy desertification during 2000–2020. The findings are as follows: (1) The year 2006 was identified as the turning point for light and moderate sandy desertification land, whereafter the areas of light sandy desertification increased while the areas of moderate sandy desertification decreased. (2) The transformation patterns of sandy desertification levels were similar in two decades (i.e., 2000–2010 and 2010–2020), with slight differences in conversion areas. (3) The changing trends exhibit regional variability. Notably, reversal was predominantly observed in China, Mongolia, and India, whereas intensification was concentrated in Central Asia. (4) Various factors exerted differing influences on sandy desertification, with annual cumulative precipitation, human footprint, and gross domestic product (GDP) being particularly significant. This study will provide crucial guidance for formulating prevention and control strategies in the BRI drylands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113571"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sandy desertification in the Belt and Road Initiative drylands during 2000–2020: Assessment under the Land Degradation Neutrality framework\",\"authors\":\"Zhijia Zheng , Yue Dong , Hao Zhan , Jinsongdi Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sandy desertification currently poses a severe environmental challenge, hindering the socio-economic development of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) drylands. However, due to incomplete evaluation systems and unclear driving mechanisms, research on sandy desertification in the BRI drylands remains limited. To address this issue, this study followed the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) framework and constructed a new index, called sandy desertification assessment index (SDAI). Based on SDAI, this study assessed the status, evolution, and driving mechanisms of sandy desertification during 2000–2020. The findings are as follows: (1) The year 2006 was identified as the turning point for light and moderate sandy desertification land, whereafter the areas of light sandy desertification increased while the areas of moderate sandy desertification decreased. (2) The transformation patterns of sandy desertification levels were similar in two decades (i.e., 2000–2010 and 2010–2020), with slight differences in conversion areas. (3) The changing trends exhibit regional variability. Notably, reversal was predominantly observed in China, Mongolia, and India, whereas intensification was concentrated in Central Asia. (4) Various factors exerted differing influences on sandy desertification, with annual cumulative precipitation, human footprint, and gross domestic product (GDP) being particularly significant. This study will provide crucial guidance for formulating prevention and control strategies in the BRI drylands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sandy desertification in the Belt and Road Initiative drylands during 2000–2020: Assessment under the Land Degradation Neutrality framework
Sandy desertification currently poses a severe environmental challenge, hindering the socio-economic development of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) drylands. However, due to incomplete evaluation systems and unclear driving mechanisms, research on sandy desertification in the BRI drylands remains limited. To address this issue, this study followed the Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) framework and constructed a new index, called sandy desertification assessment index (SDAI). Based on SDAI, this study assessed the status, evolution, and driving mechanisms of sandy desertification during 2000–2020. The findings are as follows: (1) The year 2006 was identified as the turning point for light and moderate sandy desertification land, whereafter the areas of light sandy desertification increased while the areas of moderate sandy desertification decreased. (2) The transformation patterns of sandy desertification levels were similar in two decades (i.e., 2000–2010 and 2010–2020), with slight differences in conversion areas. (3) The changing trends exhibit regional variability. Notably, reversal was predominantly observed in China, Mongolia, and India, whereas intensification was concentrated in Central Asia. (4) Various factors exerted differing influences on sandy desertification, with annual cumulative precipitation, human footprint, and gross domestic product (GDP) being particularly significant. This study will provide crucial guidance for formulating prevention and control strategies in the BRI drylands.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.