{"title":"消除应对的机会会导致死灰复燃","authors":"Lindsay Essig Croghan , Tom Byrne , Alan Poling","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Twenty-four rats were initially trained to press a target lever under a variable-interval 30-s schedule of food delivery. Then, responses on that lever were extinguished and responses on an alternative lever were reinforced under the same schedule. Finally, target responses continued to be extinguished for all rats. For one group of rats, extinction was also arranged for alternative responses. For two groups of rats, the lever on which alternative responses occurred was retracted. No food was presented to one of those groups and food was presented under a variable-time schedule to the other. In all groups, the rate of occurrence of the target response at the beginning of the final condition exceeded the rate of occurrence at the end of the second condition, indicating resurgence. The number of target responses during the final condition was highest in the group with the lever removed and food presented independently of responding, second highest in the group with the lever removed, and lowest in the group with both levers present and no food delivered. These findings demonstrate that removing the opportunity to emit an operant response can induce resurgence, even when the stimulus that maintained such responding continues to be presented. Possible clinical implications of these findings are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 105209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removing the opportunity to respond induces resurgence\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Essig Croghan , Tom Byrne , Alan Poling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Twenty-four rats were initially trained to press a target lever under a variable-interval 30-s schedule of food delivery. Then, responses on that lever were extinguished and responses on an alternative lever were reinforced under the same schedule. Finally, target responses continued to be extinguished for all rats. For one group of rats, extinction was also arranged for alternative responses. For two groups of rats, the lever on which alternative responses occurred was retracted. No food was presented to one of those groups and food was presented under a variable-time schedule to the other. In all groups, the rate of occurrence of the target response at the beginning of the final condition exceeded the rate of occurrence at the end of the second condition, indicating resurgence. The number of target responses during the final condition was highest in the group with the lever removed and food presented independently of responding, second highest in the group with the lever removed, and lowest in the group with both levers present and no food delivered. These findings demonstrate that removing the opportunity to emit an operant response can induce resurgence, even when the stimulus that maintained such responding continues to be presented. Possible clinical implications of these findings are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000713\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Removing the opportunity to respond induces resurgence
Twenty-four rats were initially trained to press a target lever under a variable-interval 30-s schedule of food delivery. Then, responses on that lever were extinguished and responses on an alternative lever were reinforced under the same schedule. Finally, target responses continued to be extinguished for all rats. For one group of rats, extinction was also arranged for alternative responses. For two groups of rats, the lever on which alternative responses occurred was retracted. No food was presented to one of those groups and food was presented under a variable-time schedule to the other. In all groups, the rate of occurrence of the target response at the beginning of the final condition exceeded the rate of occurrence at the end of the second condition, indicating resurgence. The number of target responses during the final condition was highest in the group with the lever removed and food presented independently of responding, second highest in the group with the lever removed, and lowest in the group with both levers present and no food delivered. These findings demonstrate that removing the opportunity to emit an operant response can induce resurgence, even when the stimulus that maintained such responding continues to be presented. Possible clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.