评估色觉缺陷模拟的准确性:方法和当前模型的比较分析

IF 2.2 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 OPTICS
Xiaojie Zhao , Boyang Fu , Zhenxing Li , Chengya Lu , Qi Dai
{"title":"评估色觉缺陷模拟的准确性:方法和当前模型的比较分析","authors":"Xiaojie Zhao ,&nbsp;Boyang Fu ,&nbsp;Zhenxing Li ,&nbsp;Chengya Lu ,&nbsp;Qi Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Color vision deficiency (CVD) simulation seeks to approximate the color perception of color-deficient observers (CDOs) for color-normal observers (CNOs). This technique provides a basis for developing color-enhancement technologies aimed at helping CDOs overcome challenges in color-dependent and visualization-related tasks. However, the accuracy of current CVD simulation models remains unclear, and an effective evaluation method is lacking. In this study, we propose an evaluation method based on the quantification of color vision tests for both CDOs and CNOs. Specifically, the accuracy of a simulation model is evaluated by comparing the test results of CDOs viewing original colors and CNOs viewing model-simulated colors. Our human-factor study demonstrates that the proposed method can effectively evaluate the accuracy of CVD simulation models. Specifically, the Machado and Yaguchi models significantly outperform the Yang model in simulating the color perception of CDOs, revealing the dominant influence of the stage theory in human color vision on simulation accuracy. Moreover, our findings indicate that the decline in color discrimination ability caused by CVD is not linearly correlated with the severity of the deficiency. Minor and moderate shifts in spectral sensitivity have very limited impacts on individuals’ actual color perception. These findings can contribute to the advancement of CVD simulation models and support their applications in enhancing the color vision of CDOs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19586,"journal":{"name":"Optics Communications","volume":"587 ","pages":"Article 131961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the accuracy of color vision deficiency simulation: Methodologies and a comparative analysis of current models\",\"authors\":\"Xiaojie Zhao ,&nbsp;Boyang Fu ,&nbsp;Zhenxing Li ,&nbsp;Chengya Lu ,&nbsp;Qi Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Color vision deficiency (CVD) simulation seeks to approximate the color perception of color-deficient observers (CDOs) for color-normal observers (CNOs). This technique provides a basis for developing color-enhancement technologies aimed at helping CDOs overcome challenges in color-dependent and visualization-related tasks. However, the accuracy of current CVD simulation models remains unclear, and an effective evaluation method is lacking. In this study, we propose an evaluation method based on the quantification of color vision tests for both CDOs and CNOs. Specifically, the accuracy of a simulation model is evaluated by comparing the test results of CDOs viewing original colors and CNOs viewing model-simulated colors. Our human-factor study demonstrates that the proposed method can effectively evaluate the accuracy of CVD simulation models. Specifically, the Machado and Yaguchi models significantly outperform the Yang model in simulating the color perception of CDOs, revealing the dominant influence of the stage theory in human color vision on simulation accuracy. Moreover, our findings indicate that the decline in color discrimination ability caused by CVD is not linearly correlated with the severity of the deficiency. Minor and moderate shifts in spectral sensitivity have very limited impacts on individuals’ actual color perception. These findings can contribute to the advancement of CVD simulation models and support their applications in enhancing the color vision of CDOs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optics Communications\",\"volume\":\"587 \",\"pages\":\"Article 131961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optics Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401825004894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics Communications","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401825004894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

色觉缺陷(CVD)模拟旨在近似色觉缺陷观察者(CDOs)对颜色正常观察者(CNOs)的颜色感知。该技术为开发色彩增强技术提供了基础,旨在帮助cdo克服色彩依赖和可视化相关任务中的挑战。然而,目前CVD仿真模型的准确性尚不明确,缺乏有效的评价方法。在本研究中,我们提出了一种基于量化色彩视觉测试的评估方法,用于cdo和CNOs。具体而言,通过比较CDOs观察原始颜色和CNOs观察模型模拟颜色的测试结果,评估了仿真模型的准确性。人为因素研究表明,该方法可以有效地评价CVD仿真模型的精度。具体而言,Machado和Yaguchi模型在模拟cdo的颜色感知方面显著优于Yang模型,揭示了人类颜色视觉的阶段理论对模拟精度的主导影响。此外,我们的研究结果表明,CVD引起的颜色识别能力下降与缺陷的严重程度没有线性相关。光谱敏感度的轻微和中度变化对个体实际色彩感知的影响非常有限。这些发现有助于CVD模拟模型的发展,并支持其在增强CVD色觉方面的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the accuracy of color vision deficiency simulation: Methodologies and a comparative analysis of current models
Color vision deficiency (CVD) simulation seeks to approximate the color perception of color-deficient observers (CDOs) for color-normal observers (CNOs). This technique provides a basis for developing color-enhancement technologies aimed at helping CDOs overcome challenges in color-dependent and visualization-related tasks. However, the accuracy of current CVD simulation models remains unclear, and an effective evaluation method is lacking. In this study, we propose an evaluation method based on the quantification of color vision tests for both CDOs and CNOs. Specifically, the accuracy of a simulation model is evaluated by comparing the test results of CDOs viewing original colors and CNOs viewing model-simulated colors. Our human-factor study demonstrates that the proposed method can effectively evaluate the accuracy of CVD simulation models. Specifically, the Machado and Yaguchi models significantly outperform the Yang model in simulating the color perception of CDOs, revealing the dominant influence of the stage theory in human color vision on simulation accuracy. Moreover, our findings indicate that the decline in color discrimination ability caused by CVD is not linearly correlated with the severity of the deficiency. Minor and moderate shifts in spectral sensitivity have very limited impacts on individuals’ actual color perception. These findings can contribute to the advancement of CVD simulation models and support their applications in enhancing the color vision of CDOs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Optics Communications
Optics Communications 物理-光学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
681
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Optics Communications invites original and timely contributions containing new results in various fields of optics and photonics. The journal considers theoretical and experimental research in areas ranging from the fundamental properties of light to technological applications. Topics covered include classical and quantum optics, optical physics and light-matter interactions, lasers, imaging, guided-wave optics and optical information processing. Manuscripts should offer clear evidence of novelty and significance. Papers concentrating on mathematical and computational issues, with limited connection to optics, are not suitable for publication in the Journal. Similarly, small technical advances, or papers concerned only with engineering applications or issues of materials science fall outside the journal scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信