原位癌疫苗:重新定义肿瘤微环境中的免疫激活

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Prabhanjan Giram, Kazi Md Mahabubur Rahman, Osama Aqel and Youngjae You*, 
{"title":"原位癌疫苗:重新定义肿瘤微环境中的免疫激活","authors":"Prabhanjan Giram,&nbsp;Kazi Md Mahabubur Rahman,&nbsp;Osama Aqel and Youngjae You*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c0012110.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Nanomedicines have significantly improved life expectancy and survival rates for cancer patients in current standard care. However, recurrence of cancer due to metastasis remains a significant challenge. Vaccines can provide long-term protection and are ideal for preventing bacterial and viral infections. Cancer vaccines, however, have shown limited therapeutic efficacy and raised safety concerns despite extensive research. Cancer vaccines target and stimulate responses against tumor-specific antigens and have demonstrated great potential for cancer treatment in preclinical studies. However, tumor-associated immunosuppression and immune tolerance driven by immunoediting pose significant challenges for vaccine design. In situ vaccination represents an alternative approach to traditional cancer vaccines. This strategy involves the intratumoral administration of immunostimulants to modulate the growth and differentiation of innate immune cells, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and neutrophils, and restore T-cell activity. Currently approved in situ vaccines, such as T-VEC, have demonstrated clinical promise, while ongoing clinical trials continue to explore novel strategies for broader efficacy. Despite these advancements, failures in vaccine research highlight the need to address tumor-associated immune suppression and immune escape mechanisms. In situ vaccination strategies combine innate and adaptive immune stimulation, leveraging tumor-associated antigens to activate dendritic cells and cross-prime CD8+ T cells. Various vaccine modalities, such as nucleotide-based vaccines (e.g., RNA and DNA vaccines), peptide-based vaccines, and cell-based vaccines (including dendritic, T-cell, and B-cell approaches), show significant potential. Plant-based viral approaches, including cowpea mosaic virus and Newcastle disease virus, further expand the toolkit for in situ vaccination. Therapeutic modalities such as chemotherapy, radiation, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and Checkpoint blockade inhibitors contribute to enhanced antigen presentation and immune activation. Adjuvants like CpG-ODN and PRR agonists further enhance immune modulation and vaccine efficacy. The advantages of in situ vaccination include patient specificity, personalization, minimized antigen immune escape, and reduced logistical costs. However, significant barriers such as tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, and logistical challenges remain. This review explores strategies for developing potent cancer vaccines, examines ongoing clinical trials, evaluates immune stimulation methods, and discusses prospects for advancing in situ cancer vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":"11 5","pages":"2550–2583 2550–2583"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Situ Cancer Vaccines: Redefining Immune Activation in the Tumor Microenvironment\",\"authors\":\"Prabhanjan Giram,&nbsp;Kazi Md Mahabubur Rahman,&nbsp;Osama Aqel and Youngjae You*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c0012110.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Nanomedicines have significantly improved life expectancy and survival rates for cancer patients in current standard care. However, recurrence of cancer due to metastasis remains a significant challenge. Vaccines can provide long-term protection and are ideal for preventing bacterial and viral infections. Cancer vaccines, however, have shown limited therapeutic efficacy and raised safety concerns despite extensive research. Cancer vaccines target and stimulate responses against tumor-specific antigens and have demonstrated great potential for cancer treatment in preclinical studies. However, tumor-associated immunosuppression and immune tolerance driven by immunoediting pose significant challenges for vaccine design. In situ vaccination represents an alternative approach to traditional cancer vaccines. This strategy involves the intratumoral administration of immunostimulants to modulate the growth and differentiation of innate immune cells, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and neutrophils, and restore T-cell activity. Currently approved in situ vaccines, such as T-VEC, have demonstrated clinical promise, while ongoing clinical trials continue to explore novel strategies for broader efficacy. Despite these advancements, failures in vaccine research highlight the need to address tumor-associated immune suppression and immune escape mechanisms. In situ vaccination strategies combine innate and adaptive immune stimulation, leveraging tumor-associated antigens to activate dendritic cells and cross-prime CD8+ T cells. Various vaccine modalities, such as nucleotide-based vaccines (e.g., RNA and DNA vaccines), peptide-based vaccines, and cell-based vaccines (including dendritic, T-cell, and B-cell approaches), show significant potential. Plant-based viral approaches, including cowpea mosaic virus and Newcastle disease virus, further expand the toolkit for in situ vaccination. Therapeutic modalities such as chemotherapy, radiation, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and Checkpoint blockade inhibitors contribute to enhanced antigen presentation and immune activation. Adjuvants like CpG-ODN and PRR agonists further enhance immune modulation and vaccine efficacy. The advantages of in situ vaccination include patient specificity, personalization, minimized antigen immune escape, and reduced logistical costs. However, significant barriers such as tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, and logistical challenges remain. This review explores strategies for developing potent cancer vaccines, examines ongoing clinical trials, evaluates immune stimulation methods, and discusses prospects for advancing in situ cancer vaccination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"2550–2583 2550–2583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00121\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症是全球死亡的主要原因之一。纳米药物在目前的标准治疗中显著提高了癌症患者的预期寿命和生存率。然而,由于转移引起的癌症复发仍然是一个重大挑战。疫苗可以提供长期保护,是预防细菌和病毒感染的理想选择。然而,癌症疫苗显示出有限的治疗效果,尽管进行了广泛的研究,但仍引起了对安全性的担忧。癌症疫苗靶向和刺激针对肿瘤特异性抗原的反应,并在临床前研究中显示出巨大的癌症治疗潜力。然而,由免疫编辑驱动的肿瘤相关免疫抑制和免疫耐受对疫苗设计提出了重大挑战。就地接种是传统癌症疫苗的一种替代方法。该策略包括肿瘤内给予免疫刺激剂来调节先天免疫细胞(如树突状细胞、巨噬细胞和中性粒细胞)的生长和分化,并恢复t细胞的活性。目前批准的原位疫苗,如T-VEC,已显示出临床前景,而正在进行的临床试验继续探索更广泛疗效的新策略。尽管取得了这些进展,但疫苗研究的失败凸显了解决肿瘤相关免疫抑制和免疫逃逸机制的必要性。原位疫苗接种策略结合了先天和适应性免疫刺激,利用肿瘤相关抗原激活树突状细胞和交叉prime CD8+ T细胞。各种疫苗模式,如基于核苷酸的疫苗(例如RNA和DNA疫苗)、基于肽的疫苗和基于细胞的疫苗(包括树突状、t细胞和b细胞方法),显示出巨大的潜力。基于植物的病毒方法,包括豇豆花叶病毒和新城疫病毒,进一步扩展了原位疫苗接种的工具包。化疗、放疗、光动力疗法、光热疗法和检查点阻断抑制剂等治疗方式有助于增强抗原呈递和免疫激活。CpG-ODN和PRR激动剂等佐剂进一步增强免疫调节和疫苗效力。原位疫苗接种的优点包括患者特异性、个性化、最小化抗原免疫逃逸和降低后勤成本。然而,诸如肿瘤异质性、免疫逃避和后勤挑战等重大障碍仍然存在。这篇综述探讨了开发强效癌症疫苗的策略,检查了正在进行的临床试验,评估了免疫刺激方法,并讨论了推进原位癌症疫苗接种的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In Situ Cancer Vaccines: Redefining Immune Activation in the Tumor Microenvironment

In Situ Cancer Vaccines: Redefining Immune Activation in the Tumor Microenvironment

Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Nanomedicines have significantly improved life expectancy and survival rates for cancer patients in current standard care. However, recurrence of cancer due to metastasis remains a significant challenge. Vaccines can provide long-term protection and are ideal for preventing bacterial and viral infections. Cancer vaccines, however, have shown limited therapeutic efficacy and raised safety concerns despite extensive research. Cancer vaccines target and stimulate responses against tumor-specific antigens and have demonstrated great potential for cancer treatment in preclinical studies. However, tumor-associated immunosuppression and immune tolerance driven by immunoediting pose significant challenges for vaccine design. In situ vaccination represents an alternative approach to traditional cancer vaccines. This strategy involves the intratumoral administration of immunostimulants to modulate the growth and differentiation of innate immune cells, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and neutrophils, and restore T-cell activity. Currently approved in situ vaccines, such as T-VEC, have demonstrated clinical promise, while ongoing clinical trials continue to explore novel strategies for broader efficacy. Despite these advancements, failures in vaccine research highlight the need to address tumor-associated immune suppression and immune escape mechanisms. In situ vaccination strategies combine innate and adaptive immune stimulation, leveraging tumor-associated antigens to activate dendritic cells and cross-prime CD8+ T cells. Various vaccine modalities, such as nucleotide-based vaccines (e.g., RNA and DNA vaccines), peptide-based vaccines, and cell-based vaccines (including dendritic, T-cell, and B-cell approaches), show significant potential. Plant-based viral approaches, including cowpea mosaic virus and Newcastle disease virus, further expand the toolkit for in situ vaccination. Therapeutic modalities such as chemotherapy, radiation, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and Checkpoint blockade inhibitors contribute to enhanced antigen presentation and immune activation. Adjuvants like CpG-ODN and PRR agonists further enhance immune modulation and vaccine efficacy. The advantages of in situ vaccination include patient specificity, personalization, minimized antigen immune escape, and reduced logistical costs. However, significant barriers such as tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, and logistical challenges remain. This review explores strategies for developing potent cancer vaccines, examines ongoing clinical trials, evaluates immune stimulation methods, and discusses prospects for advancing in situ cancer vaccination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
413
期刊介绍: ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics: Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信