积极生活经历中的社会人口差异

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Naomi Podber, Tara L. Gruenewald
{"title":"积极生活经历中的社会人口差异","authors":"Naomi Podber, Tara L. Gruenewald","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00870-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals’ daily positive life experiences, from having a good conversation to taking a relaxing bath, may be thought of as mundane, but when added together they may be key contributors to making life meaningful and enjoyable. Some individuals, however, may have more frequent access to positive life experiences or may be able to enjoy them more. We used data from the Midlife Development in the US Study to examine disparities in overall frequency and enjoyment of positive life experiences across socioeconomic status (SES), race, and sexual orientation (with consideration of gender and age), as well as whether positive experiences may mediate associations between sociodemographic characteristics and psychological health and well-being (life satisfaction, positive affect, depressive and anxiety symptomatology), as measured concurrently with positive experiences (Study 1; N = 2,118). We then extended these analyses to 3 indicators of well-being (positive and negative affect, life satisfaction) measured 7 years later (Study 2; N = 1,182). We found that people of lower SES, Black people, other people of color, and gay/bisexual people had a lower frequency of positive experiences. Similar patterns were seen for enjoyment, but with smaller effect sizes. Racial associations with positive experiences were attenuated after adjustment for SES. In mediation analyses, positive experiences mediated associations between greater SES and better psychological health and well-being. Positive experiences also appeared to play a role in the lower life satisfaction observed in gay/bisexual participants. Potential disparities in accessing and engaging in positive life experiences, and the role of such disparities in well-being, warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographic Disparities in Positive Life Experiences\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Podber, Tara L. Gruenewald\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10902-025-00870-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Individuals’ daily positive life experiences, from having a good conversation to taking a relaxing bath, may be thought of as mundane, but when added together they may be key contributors to making life meaningful and enjoyable. Some individuals, however, may have more frequent access to positive life experiences or may be able to enjoy them more. We used data from the Midlife Development in the US Study to examine disparities in overall frequency and enjoyment of positive life experiences across socioeconomic status (SES), race, and sexual orientation (with consideration of gender and age), as well as whether positive experiences may mediate associations between sociodemographic characteristics and psychological health and well-being (life satisfaction, positive affect, depressive and anxiety symptomatology), as measured concurrently with positive experiences (Study 1; N = 2,118). We then extended these analyses to 3 indicators of well-being (positive and negative affect, life satisfaction) measured 7 years later (Study 2; N = 1,182). We found that people of lower SES, Black people, other people of color, and gay/bisexual people had a lower frequency of positive experiences. Similar patterns were seen for enjoyment, but with smaller effect sizes. Racial associations with positive experiences were attenuated after adjustment for SES. In mediation analyses, positive experiences mediated associations between greater SES and better psychological health and well-being. Positive experiences also appeared to play a role in the lower life satisfaction observed in gay/bisexual participants. Potential disparities in accessing and engaging in positive life experiences, and the role of such disparities in well-being, warrant further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00870-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00870-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个人每天积极的生活经历,从愉快的谈话到轻松的洗澡,可能被认为是平凡的,但当它们加在一起时,它们可能是使生活变得有意义和愉快的关键因素。然而,有些人可能更频繁地接触到积极的生活经历,或者更能享受这些经历。我们使用来自美国中年发展研究的数据来检查不同社会经济地位(SES),种族和性取向(考虑性别和年龄)的积极生活经历的总体频率和享受的差异,以及积极经历是否可能介导社会人口特征与心理健康和福祉之间的关联(生活满意度,积极影响,抑郁和焦虑症状)。与积极体验同时测量(研究1;n = 2,118)。然后,我们将这些分析扩展到7年后测量的3个幸福指标(积极和消极影响,生活满意度)(研究2;n = 1182)。我们发现社会经济地位较低的人、黑人、其他有色人种和同性恋/双性恋者的积极体验频率较低。在享受方面也有类似的模式,但效果较小。经社会经济地位调整后,积极体验的种族关联减弱。在中介分析中,积极的经历介导了更高的社会经济地位与更好的心理健康和幸福感之间的关联。在同性恋/双性恋参与者中观察到,积极的经历似乎也在较低的生活满意度中发挥作用。在获得和参与积极生活体验方面的潜在差异,以及这种差异在幸福感中的作用,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociodemographic Disparities in Positive Life Experiences

Individuals’ daily positive life experiences, from having a good conversation to taking a relaxing bath, may be thought of as mundane, but when added together they may be key contributors to making life meaningful and enjoyable. Some individuals, however, may have more frequent access to positive life experiences or may be able to enjoy them more. We used data from the Midlife Development in the US Study to examine disparities in overall frequency and enjoyment of positive life experiences across socioeconomic status (SES), race, and sexual orientation (with consideration of gender and age), as well as whether positive experiences may mediate associations between sociodemographic characteristics and psychological health and well-being (life satisfaction, positive affect, depressive and anxiety symptomatology), as measured concurrently with positive experiences (Study 1; N = 2,118). We then extended these analyses to 3 indicators of well-being (positive and negative affect, life satisfaction) measured 7 years later (Study 2; N = 1,182). We found that people of lower SES, Black people, other people of color, and gay/bisexual people had a lower frequency of positive experiences. Similar patterns were seen for enjoyment, but with smaller effect sizes. Racial associations with positive experiences were attenuated after adjustment for SES. In mediation analyses, positive experiences mediated associations between greater SES and better psychological health and well-being. Positive experiences also appeared to play a role in the lower life satisfaction observed in gay/bisexual participants. Potential disparities in accessing and engaging in positive life experiences, and the role of such disparities in well-being, warrant further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work. The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields. The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments. The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes. Central Questions include, but are not limited to: Conceptualization: What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being? How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life? Operationalization and Measurement: Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life? How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain? What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions? Prevalence and causality Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings? How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)? What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions? Evaluation: What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress? Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers? Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health? Interdisciplinary studies: How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines? Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research? What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信