Kexin Yang, Kang Hou, Lixia Ma, Ruochen Mei, Yujie Zhu, Xuxiang Li
{"title":"典型干旱区生态脆弱性的主要驱动因素是自然因素还是人为因素?从进化过程框架的分析","authors":"Kexin Yang, Kang Hou, Lixia Ma, Ruochen Mei, Yujie Zhu, Xuxiang Li","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a key indicator of regional sustainable development, in‐depth study of ecological vulnerability (EV) is conducive to the realization of precise ecological protection. However, the complexity of the regional environment causes the driving mechanism of EV to be difficult to clarify, particularly for areas with special natural climates. This study developed a comprehensive natural‐social‐economic‐pollution‐environmental (NSEPE) index system and analytical framework for typical arid areas, revealing EV's spatiotemporal heterogeneity and driving factors. Based on structural equation modeling, the spatial driving mechanism of the dominant factors was clarified. Finally, the spatial heterogeneity of EV in 2035 under different scenarios was predicted using the CA‐Markov model. The results indicated that: (1) Ecological vulnerability grades exhibited a southeast‐northwest increasing trend (2000–2020), with 9.6% areas transitioning from high to low vulnerability. (2) The three factors of precipitation, farmers' income, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were the most important factors causing EV in the study area. (3) Sustainable development scenarios better support ecological protection and human‐nature harmony by predicting for 2035. This study can quantitatively identify the law of spatial heterogeneity of EV and its influencing factors, and also provides a feasible idea for EV evolution in areas with complex natural environments and frequent human activities.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the Main Drivers of Ecological Vulnerability in Typical Arid Zones Natural or Anthropogenic? An Analysis From an Evolutionary Process Framework\",\"authors\":\"Kexin Yang, Kang Hou, Lixia Ma, Ruochen Mei, Yujie Zhu, Xuxiang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ldr.5638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a key indicator of regional sustainable development, in‐depth study of ecological vulnerability (EV) is conducive to the realization of precise ecological protection. However, the complexity of the regional environment causes the driving mechanism of EV to be difficult to clarify, particularly for areas with special natural climates. This study developed a comprehensive natural‐social‐economic‐pollution‐environmental (NSEPE) index system and analytical framework for typical arid areas, revealing EV's spatiotemporal heterogeneity and driving factors. Based on structural equation modeling, the spatial driving mechanism of the dominant factors was clarified. Finally, the spatial heterogeneity of EV in 2035 under different scenarios was predicted using the CA‐Markov model. The results indicated that: (1) Ecological vulnerability grades exhibited a southeast‐northwest increasing trend (2000–2020), with 9.6% areas transitioning from high to low vulnerability. (2) The three factors of precipitation, farmers' income, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were the most important factors causing EV in the study area. (3) Sustainable development scenarios better support ecological protection and human‐nature harmony by predicting for 2035. This study can quantitatively identify the law of spatial heterogeneity of EV and its influencing factors, and also provides a feasible idea for EV evolution in areas with complex natural environments and frequent human activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Degradation & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5638\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are the Main Drivers of Ecological Vulnerability in Typical Arid Zones Natural or Anthropogenic? An Analysis From an Evolutionary Process Framework
As a key indicator of regional sustainable development, in‐depth study of ecological vulnerability (EV) is conducive to the realization of precise ecological protection. However, the complexity of the regional environment causes the driving mechanism of EV to be difficult to clarify, particularly for areas with special natural climates. This study developed a comprehensive natural‐social‐economic‐pollution‐environmental (NSEPE) index system and analytical framework for typical arid areas, revealing EV's spatiotemporal heterogeneity and driving factors. Based on structural equation modeling, the spatial driving mechanism of the dominant factors was clarified. Finally, the spatial heterogeneity of EV in 2035 under different scenarios was predicted using the CA‐Markov model. The results indicated that: (1) Ecological vulnerability grades exhibited a southeast‐northwest increasing trend (2000–2020), with 9.6% areas transitioning from high to low vulnerability. (2) The three factors of precipitation, farmers' income, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were the most important factors causing EV in the study area. (3) Sustainable development scenarios better support ecological protection and human‐nature harmony by predicting for 2035. This study can quantitatively identify the law of spatial heterogeneity of EV and its influencing factors, and also provides a feasible idea for EV evolution in areas with complex natural environments and frequent human activities.
期刊介绍:
Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on:
- what land degradation is;
- what causes land degradation;
- the impacts of land degradation
- the scale of land degradation;
- the history, current status or future trends of land degradation;
- avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation;
- remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land;
- sustainable land management.