基于图像的性侵犯情境中旁观者干预意图的情境促进因素和障碍。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Chelsea Mainwaring,Adrian J Scott,Fiona Gabbert
{"title":"基于图像的性侵犯情境中旁观者干预意图的情境促进因素和障碍。","authors":"Chelsea Mainwaring,Adrian J Scott,Fiona Gabbert","doi":"10.1177/08862605251336347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) encompasses the taking, sharing, and/or making threats to share nude or sexual images of others without consent. Research shows that a large percentage of individuals have been a bystander to IBSA, but most do not intervene. Currently, there is little understanding of why this is the case. The research presented in this article begins to address this gap in the literature by identifying situational factors that facilitate or inhibit behavioral intentions to intervene through three experimental studies. In each study, situational factors were manipulated using vignettes that depicted the taking of images without consent (Study 1; n = 126), sharing images without consent (Study 2; n = 125), and threatening to share images (Study 3; n = 125). The dependent variable across studies was how likely they would be to intervene if they witnessed the scenario described. Study 1 investigated the effect of the presence of other bystanders (no other bystanders present, other bystanders present who were friends with each other, or other bystanders present who were strangers to each other), and no significant effect was found. Study 2 investigated the role of initial consent to take the image (self-taken or stealth-taken) and the bystander relationship with the victim (friend or stranger). Likelihood to intervene was less likely when the image was self-taken, and the victim was a stranger. Finally, Study 3 investigated the role of initial consent to take the image and bystander relationship with the perpetrator (friend or stranger). Perpetrator-focused intervention was more likely, but justice-focused intervention was less likely, when the perpetrator was a friend. These findings have implications for the development of educational materials, campaigns, and agendas aimed at encouraging bystander intervention.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"12 1","pages":"8862605251336347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Situational Facilitators and Barriers of Bystander Intervention Intent in Image-Based Sexual Abuse Contexts.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Mainwaring,Adrian J Scott,Fiona Gabbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251336347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) encompasses the taking, sharing, and/or making threats to share nude or sexual images of others without consent. Research shows that a large percentage of individuals have been a bystander to IBSA, but most do not intervene. Currently, there is little understanding of why this is the case. The research presented in this article begins to address this gap in the literature by identifying situational factors that facilitate or inhibit behavioral intentions to intervene through three experimental studies. In each study, situational factors were manipulated using vignettes that depicted the taking of images without consent (Study 1; n = 126), sharing images without consent (Study 2; n = 125), and threatening to share images (Study 3; n = 125). The dependent variable across studies was how likely they would be to intervene if they witnessed the scenario described. Study 1 investigated the effect of the presence of other bystanders (no other bystanders present, other bystanders present who were friends with each other, or other bystanders present who were strangers to each other), and no significant effect was found. Study 2 investigated the role of initial consent to take the image (self-taken or stealth-taken) and the bystander relationship with the victim (friend or stranger). Likelihood to intervene was less likely when the image was self-taken, and the victim was a stranger. Finally, Study 3 investigated the role of initial consent to take the image and bystander relationship with the perpetrator (friend or stranger). Perpetrator-focused intervention was more likely, but justice-focused intervention was less likely, when the perpetrator was a friend. These findings have implications for the development of educational materials, campaigns, and agendas aimed at encouraging bystander intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"8862605251336347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251336347\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251336347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于图像的性虐待(IBSA)包括未经同意的拍摄、分享和/或威胁分享他人的裸体或性图像。研究表明,很大比例的个体一直是IBSA的旁观者,但大多数人不干预。目前,人们对为什么会出现这种情况知之甚少。本文提出的研究通过三个实验研究,通过识别促进或抑制行为意图干预的情境因素,开始解决文献中的这一空白。在每项研究中,情境因素都是通过描述未经同意拍摄图像的小插图来操纵的(研究1;n = 126),未经同意分享图片(研究2;n = 125),威胁分享图片(研究3;N = 125)。研究中的因变量是,如果他们目睹了所描述的情景,他们干预的可能性有多大。研究1调查了其他旁观者的存在(没有其他旁观者在场,其他旁观者彼此是朋友,或其他旁观者彼此是陌生人)的影响,没有发现显著的影响。研究2调查了最初同意拍照的角色(自拍或偷拍)和旁观者与受害者(朋友或陌生人)的关系。当照片是自己拍的,而且受害者是陌生人时,干预的可能性较小。最后,研究3调查了初始同意拍照的作用以及与加害者(朋友或陌生人)的旁观者关系。当肇事者是朋友时,以肇事者为中心的干预更有可能,但以正义为中心的干预则不太可能。这些发现对旨在鼓励旁观者干预的教育材料、运动和议程的发展具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Situational Facilitators and Barriers of Bystander Intervention Intent in Image-Based Sexual Abuse Contexts.
Image-based sexual abuse (IBSA) encompasses the taking, sharing, and/or making threats to share nude or sexual images of others without consent. Research shows that a large percentage of individuals have been a bystander to IBSA, but most do not intervene. Currently, there is little understanding of why this is the case. The research presented in this article begins to address this gap in the literature by identifying situational factors that facilitate or inhibit behavioral intentions to intervene through three experimental studies. In each study, situational factors were manipulated using vignettes that depicted the taking of images without consent (Study 1; n = 126), sharing images without consent (Study 2; n = 125), and threatening to share images (Study 3; n = 125). The dependent variable across studies was how likely they would be to intervene if they witnessed the scenario described. Study 1 investigated the effect of the presence of other bystanders (no other bystanders present, other bystanders present who were friends with each other, or other bystanders present who were strangers to each other), and no significant effect was found. Study 2 investigated the role of initial consent to take the image (self-taken or stealth-taken) and the bystander relationship with the victim (friend or stranger). Likelihood to intervene was less likely when the image was self-taken, and the victim was a stranger. Finally, Study 3 investigated the role of initial consent to take the image and bystander relationship with the perpetrator (friend or stranger). Perpetrator-focused intervention was more likely, but justice-focused intervention was less likely, when the perpetrator was a friend. These findings have implications for the development of educational materials, campaigns, and agendas aimed at encouraging bystander intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信