兴奋剂药物的使用和精神病经历的风险。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Kirstie O'Hare,Jonah F Byrne,Hugh Ramsay,Liana Romaniuk,Jane McGrath,Dolores Keating,Maria Migone,Karen O'Connor,Nicola Coss,Mary Cannon,David Cotter,Colm Healy,Ian Kelleher
{"title":"兴奋剂药物的使用和精神病经历的风险。","authors":"Kirstie O'Hare,Jonah F Byrne,Hugh Ramsay,Liana Romaniuk,Jane McGrath,Dolores Keating,Maria Migone,Karen O'Connor,Nicola Coss,Mary Cannon,David Cotter,Colm Healy,Ian Kelleher","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-069142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\r\nThe prescription of stimulant medications for young people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is common and increasing. Concerns have been raised about potentially psychotogenic effects of stimulants, and previous observational research has documented an increased risk of psychotic experiences in young people prescribed stimulants. Our aim was to estimate the causal effect of stimulants on psychotic experiences.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe trial was emulated using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study data. Eligible participants were aged between 9 and 14 years. Treatment (stimulant prescription) propensities were derived using covariates indexing demographic factors and mental illness severity. The average causal effect of first stimulant prescription on psychotic experiences by 1-year follow-up was derived using inverse probability of treatment weighting followed by standardization (doubly robust estimation).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 8391 participants included in the analytical sample, 460 (5.5%) reported 1 or more stimulant prescriptions. In unweighted analyses, stimulant prescription was associated with subsequent psychotic experiences (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.15-1.84). The reverse, however, was also true, in that baseline psychotic experiences predicted subsequent stimulant treatment (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.57-2.37). When applying doubly robust estimation, there was no evidence of a causal effect of stimulant prescription on the subsequent occurrence of psychotic experiences (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71-1.56).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur findings do not support a causal relationship between stimulant prescription and psychotic experiences. Rather, the association appears to be confounded by factors that both increase probability of stimulant prescription and lead to psychotic experiences.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulant Medication Use and Risk of Psychotic Experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Kirstie O'Hare,Jonah F Byrne,Hugh Ramsay,Liana Romaniuk,Jane McGrath,Dolores Keating,Maria Migone,Karen O'Connor,Nicola Coss,Mary Cannon,David Cotter,Colm Healy,Ian Kelleher\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-069142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\\r\\nThe prescription of stimulant medications for young people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is common and increasing. Concerns have been raised about potentially psychotogenic effects of stimulants, and previous observational research has documented an increased risk of psychotic experiences in young people prescribed stimulants. Our aim was to estimate the causal effect of stimulants on psychotic experiences.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe trial was emulated using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study data. Eligible participants were aged between 9 and 14 years. Treatment (stimulant prescription) propensities were derived using covariates indexing demographic factors and mental illness severity. The average causal effect of first stimulant prescription on psychotic experiences by 1-year follow-up was derived using inverse probability of treatment weighting followed by standardization (doubly robust estimation).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 8391 participants included in the analytical sample, 460 (5.5%) reported 1 or more stimulant prescriptions. In unweighted analyses, stimulant prescription was associated with subsequent psychotic experiences (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.15-1.84). The reverse, however, was also true, in that baseline psychotic experiences predicted subsequent stimulant treatment (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.57-2.37). When applying doubly robust estimation, there was no evidence of a causal effect of stimulant prescription on the subsequent occurrence of psychotic experiences (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71-1.56).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nOur findings do not support a causal relationship between stimulant prescription and psychotic experiences. Rather, the association appears to be confounded by factors that both increase probability of stimulant prescription and lead to psychotic experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-069142\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-069142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:青少年注意缺陷/多动障碍患者服用兴奋剂的情况很常见,而且越来越多。人们对兴奋剂潜在的精神致因效应感到担忧,之前的观察性研究已经证明,服用兴奋剂的年轻人患精神病的风险增加。我们的目的是估计兴奋剂对精神病体验的因果影响。方法采用青少年大脑认知发展研究数据进行模拟试验。符合条件的参与者年龄在9到14岁之间。治疗(兴奋剂处方)倾向使用协变量指数人口统计因素和精神疾病严重程度推导。通过1年随访,首次兴奋剂处方对精神病经历的平均因果效应采用治疗加权逆概率,然后标准化(双稳健估计)。结果纳入分析样本的8391名参与者中,460名(5.5%)报告服用1种或1种以上兴奋剂处方。在未加权分析中,兴奋剂处方与随后的精神病经历相关(优势比[OR]: 1.46;95% ci: 1.15-1.84)。然而,反过来也是正确的,在基线精神病经历预测随后的兴奋剂治疗(OR: 1.93;95% ci: 1.57-2.37)。当应用双稳健估计时,没有证据表明兴奋剂处方对随后精神病经历的发生有因果影响(OR: 1.09;95% ci: 0.71-1.56)。结论本研究结果不支持兴奋剂处方与精神病经历之间的因果关系。相反,这种联系似乎被增加兴奋剂处方的可能性和导致精神病经历的因素所混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stimulant Medication Use and Risk of Psychotic Experiences.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The prescription of stimulant medications for young people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is common and increasing. Concerns have been raised about potentially psychotogenic effects of stimulants, and previous observational research has documented an increased risk of psychotic experiences in young people prescribed stimulants. Our aim was to estimate the causal effect of stimulants on psychotic experiences. METHODS The trial was emulated using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study data. Eligible participants were aged between 9 and 14 years. Treatment (stimulant prescription) propensities were derived using covariates indexing demographic factors and mental illness severity. The average causal effect of first stimulant prescription on psychotic experiences by 1-year follow-up was derived using inverse probability of treatment weighting followed by standardization (doubly robust estimation). RESULTS Of 8391 participants included in the analytical sample, 460 (5.5%) reported 1 or more stimulant prescriptions. In unweighted analyses, stimulant prescription was associated with subsequent psychotic experiences (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.15-1.84). The reverse, however, was also true, in that baseline psychotic experiences predicted subsequent stimulant treatment (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.57-2.37). When applying doubly robust estimation, there was no evidence of a causal effect of stimulant prescription on the subsequent occurrence of psychotic experiences (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71-1.56). CONCLUSIONS Our findings do not support a causal relationship between stimulant prescription and psychotic experiences. Rather, the association appears to be confounded by factors that both increase probability of stimulant prescription and lead to psychotic experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信