ESICM-ESPNIC关于重症监护定量肺超声的国际专家共识。

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Silvia Mongodi,Andrea Cortegiani,Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena,Daniele Guerino Biasucci,Lieuwe D J Bos,Belaid Bouhemad,Massimo Cantinotti,Ioana Ciuca,Francesco Corradi,Martin Girard,Rebeca Gregorio-Hernandez,Maria Rosaria Gualano,Francesco Mojoli,George Ntoumenopoulos,Luigi Pisani,Francesco Raimondi,Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul,Marilena Savoia,Marry R Smit,Pieter R Tuinman,Laurent Zieleskiewicz,Daniele De Luca
{"title":"ESICM-ESPNIC关于重症监护定量肺超声的国际专家共识。","authors":"Silvia Mongodi,Andrea Cortegiani,Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena,Daniele Guerino Biasucci,Lieuwe D J Bos,Belaid Bouhemad,Massimo Cantinotti,Ioana Ciuca,Francesco Corradi,Martin Girard,Rebeca Gregorio-Hernandez,Maria Rosaria Gualano,Francesco Mojoli,George Ntoumenopoulos,Luigi Pisani,Francesco Raimondi,Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul,Marilena Savoia,Marry R Smit,Pieter R Tuinman,Laurent Zieleskiewicz,Daniele De Luca","doi":"10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo provide an international expert consensus on technical aspects and clinical applications of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) and the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) endorsed the project. We selected an international panel of 20 adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care experts with clinical and research expertise in quantitative lung ultrasound, plus two non-voting methodologists. Fourteen clinical questions were proposed by the chairs to the panel, who voted for their priority (1-9 Likert-type scale) and proposed modifications/supplementing (two-round vote). All the questions achieved the predefined threshold (mean score > 5) and 14 groups of 3 mixed adult/paediatric experts were identified to develop the statements for each clinical question; predefined groups of experts in the fields of adult and paediatric/neonatal intensive care voted statements specific for these subgroups. An iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements (two-round vote, 1-9 Likert-type scale); statements were classified as with agreement (range 7-9), uncertainty (4-6), disagreement (1-3) when the median score and ≥ 75% of votes laid within a specific range.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 46 statements were produced (4 adults-only, 4 paediatric/neonatal-only, 38 interdisciplinary); all obtained agreement. This result was also achieved by acknowledging in the statements the current limitations of quantitative lung ultrasound.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis consensus guides the use of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care and helps identify the fields where further research will be needed in the future.","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Mongodi,Andrea Cortegiani,Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena,Daniele Guerino Biasucci,Lieuwe D J Bos,Belaid Bouhemad,Massimo Cantinotti,Ioana Ciuca,Francesco Corradi,Martin Girard,Rebeca Gregorio-Hernandez,Maria Rosaria Gualano,Francesco Mojoli,George Ntoumenopoulos,Luigi Pisani,Francesco Raimondi,Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul,Marilena Savoia,Marry R Smit,Pieter R Tuinman,Laurent Zieleskiewicz,Daniele De Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nTo provide an international expert consensus on technical aspects and clinical applications of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) and the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) endorsed the project. We selected an international panel of 20 adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care experts with clinical and research expertise in quantitative lung ultrasound, plus two non-voting methodologists. Fourteen clinical questions were proposed by the chairs to the panel, who voted for their priority (1-9 Likert-type scale) and proposed modifications/supplementing (two-round vote). All the questions achieved the predefined threshold (mean score > 5) and 14 groups of 3 mixed adult/paediatric experts were identified to develop the statements for each clinical question; predefined groups of experts in the fields of adult and paediatric/neonatal intensive care voted statements specific for these subgroups. An iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements (two-round vote, 1-9 Likert-type scale); statements were classified as with agreement (range 7-9), uncertainty (4-6), disagreement (1-3) when the median score and ≥ 75% of votes laid within a specific range.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 46 statements were produced (4 adults-only, 4 paediatric/neonatal-only, 38 interdisciplinary); all obtained agreement. This result was also achieved by acknowledging in the statements the current limitations of quantitative lung ultrasound.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThis consensus guides the use of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care and helps identify the fields where further research will be needed in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":27.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为定量肺超声在成人、儿科和新生儿重症监护中的技术和临床应用提供国际专家共识。方法欧洲重症监护学会(ESICM)和欧洲儿科和新生儿重症监护学会(ESPNIC)批准了该项目。我们选择了一个由20名成人、儿科和新生儿重症监护专家组成的国际小组,他们在定量肺超声方面具有临床和研究专长,另外还有两名无投票权的方法学家。主席向专家组提出了14个临床问题,他们投票决定其优先级(1-9李克特量表)和提出修改/补充(两轮投票)。所有问题均达到预先设定的阈值(平均得分bbbb5),并确定了14组3名成人/儿科混合专家为每个临床问题制定陈述;预先确定的成人和儿科/新生儿重症监护领域的专家小组针对这些小组投票表决了声明。采用迭代法获得最终共识陈述(两轮投票,1-9李克特量表);当中位数得分和≥75%的投票在特定范围内时,将陈述分为同意(范围7-9),不确定(4-6),不同意(1-3)。结果共产生46份报告(仅成人4份,儿科/新生儿4份,跨学科38份);均获得同意。这一结果也是通过在声明中承认目前定量肺超声的局限性而实现的。结论该共识指导了定量肺超声在成人、儿科和新生儿重症监护中的应用,并有助于确定未来需要进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care.
PURPOSE To provide an international expert consensus on technical aspects and clinical applications of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care. METHODS The European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) and the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) endorsed the project. We selected an international panel of 20 adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care experts with clinical and research expertise in quantitative lung ultrasound, plus two non-voting methodologists. Fourteen clinical questions were proposed by the chairs to the panel, who voted for their priority (1-9 Likert-type scale) and proposed modifications/supplementing (two-round vote). All the questions achieved the predefined threshold (mean score > 5) and 14 groups of 3 mixed adult/paediatric experts were identified to develop the statements for each clinical question; predefined groups of experts in the fields of adult and paediatric/neonatal intensive care voted statements specific for these subgroups. An iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements (two-round vote, 1-9 Likert-type scale); statements were classified as with agreement (range 7-9), uncertainty (4-6), disagreement (1-3) when the median score and ≥ 75% of votes laid within a specific range. RESULTS A total of 46 statements were produced (4 adults-only, 4 paediatric/neonatal-only, 38 interdisciplinary); all obtained agreement. This result was also achieved by acknowledging in the statements the current limitations of quantitative lung ultrasound. CONCLUSION This consensus guides the use of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care and helps identify the fields where further research will be needed in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信