Silvia Mongodi,Andrea Cortegiani,Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena,Daniele Guerino Biasucci,Lieuwe D J Bos,Belaid Bouhemad,Massimo Cantinotti,Ioana Ciuca,Francesco Corradi,Martin Girard,Rebeca Gregorio-Hernandez,Maria Rosaria Gualano,Francesco Mojoli,George Ntoumenopoulos,Luigi Pisani,Francesco Raimondi,Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul,Marilena Savoia,Marry R Smit,Pieter R Tuinman,Laurent Zieleskiewicz,Daniele De Luca
{"title":"ESICM-ESPNIC关于重症监护定量肺超声的国际专家共识。","authors":"Silvia Mongodi,Andrea Cortegiani,Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena,Daniele Guerino Biasucci,Lieuwe D J Bos,Belaid Bouhemad,Massimo Cantinotti,Ioana Ciuca,Francesco Corradi,Martin Girard,Rebeca Gregorio-Hernandez,Maria Rosaria Gualano,Francesco Mojoli,George Ntoumenopoulos,Luigi Pisani,Francesco Raimondi,Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul,Marilena Savoia,Marry R Smit,Pieter R Tuinman,Laurent Zieleskiewicz,Daniele De Luca","doi":"10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo provide an international expert consensus on technical aspects and clinical applications of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) and the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) endorsed the project. We selected an international panel of 20 adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care experts with clinical and research expertise in quantitative lung ultrasound, plus two non-voting methodologists. Fourteen clinical questions were proposed by the chairs to the panel, who voted for their priority (1-9 Likert-type scale) and proposed modifications/supplementing (two-round vote). All the questions achieved the predefined threshold (mean score > 5) and 14 groups of 3 mixed adult/paediatric experts were identified to develop the statements for each clinical question; predefined groups of experts in the fields of adult and paediatric/neonatal intensive care voted statements specific for these subgroups. An iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements (two-round vote, 1-9 Likert-type scale); statements were classified as with agreement (range 7-9), uncertainty (4-6), disagreement (1-3) when the median score and ≥ 75% of votes laid within a specific range.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 46 statements were produced (4 adults-only, 4 paediatric/neonatal-only, 38 interdisciplinary); all obtained agreement. This result was also achieved by acknowledging in the statements the current limitations of quantitative lung ultrasound.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis consensus guides the use of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care and helps identify the fields where further research will be needed in the future.","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Mongodi,Andrea Cortegiani,Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena,Daniele Guerino Biasucci,Lieuwe D J Bos,Belaid Bouhemad,Massimo Cantinotti,Ioana Ciuca,Francesco Corradi,Martin Girard,Rebeca Gregorio-Hernandez,Maria Rosaria Gualano,Francesco Mojoli,George Ntoumenopoulos,Luigi Pisani,Francesco Raimondi,Javier Rodriguez-Fanjul,Marilena Savoia,Marry R Smit,Pieter R Tuinman,Laurent Zieleskiewicz,Daniele De Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nTo provide an international expert consensus on technical aspects and clinical applications of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) and the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) endorsed the project. We selected an international panel of 20 adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care experts with clinical and research expertise in quantitative lung ultrasound, plus two non-voting methodologists. Fourteen clinical questions were proposed by the chairs to the panel, who voted for their priority (1-9 Likert-type scale) and proposed modifications/supplementing (two-round vote). All the questions achieved the predefined threshold (mean score > 5) and 14 groups of 3 mixed adult/paediatric experts were identified to develop the statements for each clinical question; predefined groups of experts in the fields of adult and paediatric/neonatal intensive care voted statements specific for these subgroups. An iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements (two-round vote, 1-9 Likert-type scale); statements were classified as with agreement (range 7-9), uncertainty (4-6), disagreement (1-3) when the median score and ≥ 75% of votes laid within a specific range.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 46 statements were produced (4 adults-only, 4 paediatric/neonatal-only, 38 interdisciplinary); all obtained agreement. This result was also achieved by acknowledging in the statements the current limitations of quantitative lung ultrasound.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThis consensus guides the use of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care and helps identify the fields where further research will be needed in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":27.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care.
PURPOSE
To provide an international expert consensus on technical aspects and clinical applications of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care.
METHODS
The European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) and the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) endorsed the project. We selected an international panel of 20 adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care experts with clinical and research expertise in quantitative lung ultrasound, plus two non-voting methodologists. Fourteen clinical questions were proposed by the chairs to the panel, who voted for their priority (1-9 Likert-type scale) and proposed modifications/supplementing (two-round vote). All the questions achieved the predefined threshold (mean score > 5) and 14 groups of 3 mixed adult/paediatric experts were identified to develop the statements for each clinical question; predefined groups of experts in the fields of adult and paediatric/neonatal intensive care voted statements specific for these subgroups. An iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements (two-round vote, 1-9 Likert-type scale); statements were classified as with agreement (range 7-9), uncertainty (4-6), disagreement (1-3) when the median score and ≥ 75% of votes laid within a specific range.
RESULTS
A total of 46 statements were produced (4 adults-only, 4 paediatric/neonatal-only, 38 interdisciplinary); all obtained agreement. This result was also achieved by acknowledging in the statements the current limitations of quantitative lung ultrasound.
CONCLUSION
This consensus guides the use of quantitative lung ultrasound in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care and helps identify the fields where further research will be needed in the future.
期刊介绍:
Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.