不同气候敏感性先验对预估气候的影响:一个概率分析

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Joseph K. Brown, Kalyn Dorheim, Derek Mu, Abigail Snyder, Claudia Tebaldi, Ben Bond-Lamberty
{"title":"不同气候敏感性先验对预估气候的影响:一个概率分析","authors":"Joseph K. Brown,&nbsp;Kalyn Dorheim,&nbsp;Derek Mu,&nbsp;Abigail Snyder,&nbsp;Claudia Tebaldi,&nbsp;Ben Bond-Lamberty","doi":"10.1029/2024GL113505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, equilibrium warming in response to a doubling of CO<sub>2</sub>) uncertainty is fundamental for making reliable climate projections. We leverage the Hector simple climate model in a probabilistic framework to explore how different ECS priors influence uncertainty in long-term (2081–2100) temperature projections. This method demonstrates a computationally efficient probabilistic workflow that explores the effects of parameter priors on climate projections. Excluding process and paleoclimate evidence in ECS priors widens resulting temperature projection uncertainty (a 5%–95% confidence range of 1.12–3.03°C and 1.09–3.33°C, respectively), while synthesizing all lines of evidence narrows temperature projection uncertainty (1.24–2.89°C; 5–95% CI), suggesting a more robust range of future temperature outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL113505","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Different Climate Sensitivity Priors on Projected Climate: A Probabilistic Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Joseph K. Brown,&nbsp;Kalyn Dorheim,&nbsp;Derek Mu,&nbsp;Abigail Snyder,&nbsp;Claudia Tebaldi,&nbsp;Ben Bond-Lamberty\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GL113505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Understanding equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, equilibrium warming in response to a doubling of CO<sub>2</sub>) uncertainty is fundamental for making reliable climate projections. We leverage the Hector simple climate model in a probabilistic framework to explore how different ECS priors influence uncertainty in long-term (2081–2100) temperature projections. This method demonstrates a computationally efficient probabilistic workflow that explores the effects of parameter priors on climate projections. Excluding process and paleoclimate evidence in ECS priors widens resulting temperature projection uncertainty (a 5%–95% confidence range of 1.12–3.03°C and 1.09–3.33°C, respectively), while synthesizing all lines of evidence narrows temperature projection uncertainty (1.24–2.89°C; 5–95% CI), suggesting a more robust range of future temperature outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL113505\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL113505\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL113505","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解平衡气候敏感性(ECS,对二氧化碳加倍反应的平衡变暖)的不确定性是作出可靠气候预测的基础。我们在概率框架中利用Hector简单气候模型来探索不同的ECS先验如何影响长期(2081-2100)温度预测的不确定性。该方法展示了一种计算效率高的概率工作流,探讨了参数先验对气候预测的影响。排除ECS先验中的过程和古气候证据扩大了温度预估的不确定性(5%-95%的置信范围分别为1.12-3.03°C和1.09-3.33°C),而综合所有证据线则缩小了温度预估的不确定性(1.24-2.89°C;5-95%置信区间),表明未来温度结果的范围更为稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Different Climate Sensitivity Priors on Projected Climate: A Probabilistic Analysis

The Effect of Different Climate Sensitivity Priors on Projected Climate: A Probabilistic Analysis

Understanding equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, equilibrium warming in response to a doubling of CO2) uncertainty is fundamental for making reliable climate projections. We leverage the Hector simple climate model in a probabilistic framework to explore how different ECS priors influence uncertainty in long-term (2081–2100) temperature projections. This method demonstrates a computationally efficient probabilistic workflow that explores the effects of parameter priors on climate projections. Excluding process and paleoclimate evidence in ECS priors widens resulting temperature projection uncertainty (a 5%–95% confidence range of 1.12–3.03°C and 1.09–3.33°C, respectively), while synthesizing all lines of evidence narrows temperature projection uncertainty (1.24–2.89°C; 5–95% CI), suggesting a more robust range of future temperature outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Research Letters
Geophysical Research Letters 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
1588
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信