P. Wiberg-Larsen , B. Kronvang , E.A. Kristensen , A. Baattrup-Pedersen
{"title":"在丹麦和欧洲重要的低地河流的管理和恢复之后,生物多样性的命运","authors":"P. Wiberg-Larsen , B. Kronvang , E.A. Kristensen , A. Baattrup-Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Historically, the lower River Skjern (Denmark) was a biodiversity hotspot of national and European importance, but in the 1960s this part of the river was channelized and the wetlands drained to improve conditions for agriculture. However, to regain former biodiversity, a major restoration project was conducted in 2000–2002, which transformed a 19 km straight channel into a 26 km meandering river. In this study, we use historical data to evaluate how the channelization of the river and its restoration 40 years later affected the aquatic biodiversity. Generally, and as expected, we observed a significant reduction in the taxon richness of aquatic plants and EPT taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in response to the channelization, especially taxa associated with backwaters. As hoped, the restoration mediated an increase in taxon richness for both aquatic plants and EPT taxa. This positive response took place immediately after the restoration (1 year) and persisted throughout the study period (10 years). However, taxon richness did not reach the pre-channelization levels. Especially, we observed that the recovery of backwater-associated taxa was limited. The main reason for this is likely that only 5.8 % of the original backwater area was recreated and, additionally, that natural regeneration of these areas relies on natural hydromorphological processes that might take several decades. Furthermore, the possibility of several taxa to recolonize from other and distant areas is poor, reflecting today's rarity of backwater habitats in Danish rivers. Full recovery of the river's former biodiversity might therefore take decades or more without implementing active measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 107664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fate of biodiversity following regulation and restoration of a Lowland River of Danish and European importance\",\"authors\":\"P. Wiberg-Larsen , B. Kronvang , E.A. Kristensen , A. Baattrup-Pedersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Historically, the lower River Skjern (Denmark) was a biodiversity hotspot of national and European importance, but in the 1960s this part of the river was channelized and the wetlands drained to improve conditions for agriculture. However, to regain former biodiversity, a major restoration project was conducted in 2000–2002, which transformed a 19 km straight channel into a 26 km meandering river. In this study, we use historical data to evaluate how the channelization of the river and its restoration 40 years later affected the aquatic biodiversity. Generally, and as expected, we observed a significant reduction in the taxon richness of aquatic plants and EPT taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in response to the channelization, especially taxa associated with backwaters. As hoped, the restoration mediated an increase in taxon richness for both aquatic plants and EPT taxa. This positive response took place immediately after the restoration (1 year) and persisted throughout the study period (10 years). However, taxon richness did not reach the pre-channelization levels. Especially, we observed that the recovery of backwater-associated taxa was limited. The main reason for this is likely that only 5.8 % of the original backwater area was recreated and, additionally, that natural regeneration of these areas relies on natural hydromorphological processes that might take several decades. Furthermore, the possibility of several taxa to recolonize from other and distant areas is poor, reflecting today's rarity of backwater habitats in Danish rivers. Full recovery of the river's former biodiversity might therefore take decades or more without implementing active measures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"218 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001521\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The fate of biodiversity following regulation and restoration of a Lowland River of Danish and European importance
Historically, the lower River Skjern (Denmark) was a biodiversity hotspot of national and European importance, but in the 1960s this part of the river was channelized and the wetlands drained to improve conditions for agriculture. However, to regain former biodiversity, a major restoration project was conducted in 2000–2002, which transformed a 19 km straight channel into a 26 km meandering river. In this study, we use historical data to evaluate how the channelization of the river and its restoration 40 years later affected the aquatic biodiversity. Generally, and as expected, we observed a significant reduction in the taxon richness of aquatic plants and EPT taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in response to the channelization, especially taxa associated with backwaters. As hoped, the restoration mediated an increase in taxon richness for both aquatic plants and EPT taxa. This positive response took place immediately after the restoration (1 year) and persisted throughout the study period (10 years). However, taxon richness did not reach the pre-channelization levels. Especially, we observed that the recovery of backwater-associated taxa was limited. The main reason for this is likely that only 5.8 % of the original backwater area was recreated and, additionally, that natural regeneration of these areas relies on natural hydromorphological processes that might take several decades. Furthermore, the possibility of several taxa to recolonize from other and distant areas is poor, reflecting today's rarity of backwater habitats in Danish rivers. Full recovery of the river's former biodiversity might therefore take decades or more without implementing active measures.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.