在丹麦和欧洲重要的低地河流的管理和恢复之后,生物多样性的命运

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
P. Wiberg-Larsen , B. Kronvang , E.A. Kristensen , A. Baattrup-Pedersen
{"title":"在丹麦和欧洲重要的低地河流的管理和恢复之后,生物多样性的命运","authors":"P. Wiberg-Larsen ,&nbsp;B. Kronvang ,&nbsp;E.A. Kristensen ,&nbsp;A. Baattrup-Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Historically, the lower River Skjern (Denmark) was a biodiversity hotspot of national and European importance, but in the 1960s this part of the river was channelized and the wetlands drained to improve conditions for agriculture. However, to regain former biodiversity, a major restoration project was conducted in 2000–2002, which transformed a 19 km straight channel into a 26 km meandering river. In this study, we use historical data to evaluate how the channelization of the river and its restoration 40 years later affected the aquatic biodiversity. Generally, and as expected, we observed a significant reduction in the taxon richness of aquatic plants and EPT taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in response to the channelization, especially taxa associated with backwaters. As hoped, the restoration mediated an increase in taxon richness for both aquatic plants and EPT taxa. This positive response took place immediately after the restoration (1 year) and persisted throughout the study period (10 years). However, taxon richness did not reach the pre-channelization levels. Especially, we observed that the recovery of backwater-associated taxa was limited. The main reason for this is likely that only 5.8 % of the original backwater area was recreated and, additionally, that natural regeneration of these areas relies on natural hydromorphological processes that might take several decades. Furthermore, the possibility of several taxa to recolonize from other and distant areas is poor, reflecting today's rarity of backwater habitats in Danish rivers. Full recovery of the river's former biodiversity might therefore take decades or more without implementing active measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 107664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fate of biodiversity following regulation and restoration of a Lowland River of Danish and European importance\",\"authors\":\"P. Wiberg-Larsen ,&nbsp;B. Kronvang ,&nbsp;E.A. Kristensen ,&nbsp;A. Baattrup-Pedersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Historically, the lower River Skjern (Denmark) was a biodiversity hotspot of national and European importance, but in the 1960s this part of the river was channelized and the wetlands drained to improve conditions for agriculture. However, to regain former biodiversity, a major restoration project was conducted in 2000–2002, which transformed a 19 km straight channel into a 26 km meandering river. In this study, we use historical data to evaluate how the channelization of the river and its restoration 40 years later affected the aquatic biodiversity. Generally, and as expected, we observed a significant reduction in the taxon richness of aquatic plants and EPT taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in response to the channelization, especially taxa associated with backwaters. As hoped, the restoration mediated an increase in taxon richness for both aquatic plants and EPT taxa. This positive response took place immediately after the restoration (1 year) and persisted throughout the study period (10 years). However, taxon richness did not reach the pre-channelization levels. Especially, we observed that the recovery of backwater-associated taxa was limited. The main reason for this is likely that only 5.8 % of the original backwater area was recreated and, additionally, that natural regeneration of these areas relies on natural hydromorphological processes that might take several decades. Furthermore, the possibility of several taxa to recolonize from other and distant areas is poor, reflecting today's rarity of backwater habitats in Danish rivers. Full recovery of the river's former biodiversity might therefore take decades or more without implementing active measures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"218 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001521\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史上,Skjern河下游(丹麦)是国家和欧洲重要的生物多样性热点,但在20世纪60年代,这部分河流被渠化,湿地被排干,以改善农业条件。然而,为了恢复以前的生物多样性,2000年至2002年进行了一项重大的恢复工程,将一条19公里的笔直河道变成了一条26公里的蜿蜒河流。本研究以历史数据为基础,分析了黄河河道化及其40年后的恢复对水生生物多样性的影响。一般来说,正如预期的那样,我们观察到水生植物和EPT分类群(Ephemeroptera、Plecoptera和Trichoptera)的丰富度随着河道化而显著降低,特别是与回水相关的分类群。正如所希望的那样,恢复介导了水生植物和EPT分类群的分类丰富度的增加。这种积极的反应在修复后立即发生(1年),并在整个研究期间(10年)持续存在。分类丰富度未达到河道化前的水平。特别是,我们观察到回水相关分类群的恢复是有限的。造成这种情况的主要原因可能是只有5.8%的原始死水区被重建,此外,这些地区的自然再生依赖于自然水文形态过程,这可能需要几十年的时间。此外,一些分类群从其他和遥远地区重新定居的可能性很低,这反映了今天丹麦河流中回水栖息地的罕见。因此,如果不采取积极措施,完全恢复这条河以前的生物多样性可能需要几十年甚至更长时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The fate of biodiversity following regulation and restoration of a Lowland River of Danish and European importance
Historically, the lower River Skjern (Denmark) was a biodiversity hotspot of national and European importance, but in the 1960s this part of the river was channelized and the wetlands drained to improve conditions for agriculture. However, to regain former biodiversity, a major restoration project was conducted in 2000–2002, which transformed a 19 km straight channel into a 26 km meandering river. In this study, we use historical data to evaluate how the channelization of the river and its restoration 40 years later affected the aquatic biodiversity. Generally, and as expected, we observed a significant reduction in the taxon richness of aquatic plants and EPT taxa (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in response to the channelization, especially taxa associated with backwaters. As hoped, the restoration mediated an increase in taxon richness for both aquatic plants and EPT taxa. This positive response took place immediately after the restoration (1 year) and persisted throughout the study period (10 years). However, taxon richness did not reach the pre-channelization levels. Especially, we observed that the recovery of backwater-associated taxa was limited. The main reason for this is likely that only 5.8 % of the original backwater area was recreated and, additionally, that natural regeneration of these areas relies on natural hydromorphological processes that might take several decades. Furthermore, the possibility of several taxa to recolonize from other and distant areas is poor, reflecting today's rarity of backwater habitats in Danish rivers. Full recovery of the river's former biodiversity might therefore take decades or more without implementing active measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信