综合多准则决策分析(S-MCDA):参与式交通规划新框架

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Jônatas Augusto Manzolli , Jiangbo Yu , Luis Miranda-Moreno
{"title":"综合多准则决策分析(S-MCDA):参与式交通规划新框架","authors":"Jônatas Augusto Manzolli ,&nbsp;Jiangbo Yu ,&nbsp;Luis Miranda-Moreno","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis plays a vital role in transportation planning by integrating diverse stakeholder views and balancing conflicting objectives. However, it faces high costs, time demands, and coordination difficulties. This paper introduces the Synthetic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (S-MCDA) framework, which utilizes large language models to generate synthetic actors to support participatory decision-making in transportation planning. A literature review combining bibliometric and content analysis highlights current methods across logistics, road, rail, maritime, and transit sectors. Based on these findings, the S-MCDA framework addresses stakeholder complexity and streamlines tasks like structuring analyses, eliciting preferences, and evaluating results. While the framework has the potentially to significantly improve consistency and decision quality, it raises concerns regarding computation, ethics, and AI over-reliance. Thus, the paper offers best practices for managing data quality, reducing bias, ensuring human oversight, and promoting transparency. Future research should further explore the use of synthetic agents to support collaborative decision-making in complex transport systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic multi-criteria decision analysis (S-MCDA): A new framework for participatory transportation planning\",\"authors\":\"Jônatas Augusto Manzolli ,&nbsp;Jiangbo Yu ,&nbsp;Luis Miranda-Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis plays a vital role in transportation planning by integrating diverse stakeholder views and balancing conflicting objectives. However, it faces high costs, time demands, and coordination difficulties. This paper introduces the Synthetic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (S-MCDA) framework, which utilizes large language models to generate synthetic actors to support participatory decision-making in transportation planning. A literature review combining bibliometric and content analysis highlights current methods across logistics, road, rail, maritime, and transit sectors. Based on these findings, the S-MCDA framework addresses stakeholder complexity and streamlines tasks like structuring analyses, eliciting preferences, and evaluating results. While the framework has the potentially to significantly improve consistency and decision quality, it raises concerns regarding computation, ethics, and AI over-reliance. Thus, the paper offers best practices for managing data quality, reducing bias, ensuring human oversight, and promoting transparency. Future research should further explore the use of synthetic agents to support collaborative decision-making in complex transport systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

参与式多准则决策分析通过整合不同利益相关者的观点和平衡相互冲突的目标,在交通规划中起着至关重要的作用。然而,它面临着高成本、时间要求和协调困难。本文介绍了综合多准则决策分析(S-MCDA)框架,该框架利用大型语言模型生成综合参与者,以支持交通规划中的参与式决策。结合文献计量学和内容分析的文献综述强调了物流,公路,铁路,海运和运输部门的当前方法。基于这些发现,S-MCDA框架解决了利益相关者的复杂性,并简化了结构化分析、引发偏好和评估结果等任务。虽然该框架有可能显著提高一致性和决策质量,但它引发了对计算、道德和人工智能过度依赖的担忧。因此,本文提供了管理数据质量、减少偏见、确保人为监督和促进透明度的最佳实践。未来的研究应进一步探索在复杂运输系统中使用合成代理来支持协同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synthetic multi-criteria decision analysis (S-MCDA): A new framework for participatory transportation planning
Participatory multi-criteria decision analysis plays a vital role in transportation planning by integrating diverse stakeholder views and balancing conflicting objectives. However, it faces high costs, time demands, and coordination difficulties. This paper introduces the Synthetic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (S-MCDA) framework, which utilizes large language models to generate synthetic actors to support participatory decision-making in transportation planning. A literature review combining bibliometric and content analysis highlights current methods across logistics, road, rail, maritime, and transit sectors. Based on these findings, the S-MCDA framework addresses stakeholder complexity and streamlines tasks like structuring analyses, eliciting preferences, and evaluating results. While the framework has the potentially to significantly improve consistency and decision quality, it raises concerns regarding computation, ethics, and AI over-reliance. Thus, the paper offers best practices for managing data quality, reducing bias, ensuring human oversight, and promoting transparency. Future research should further explore the use of synthetic agents to support collaborative decision-making in complex transport systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信