加拿大人对隐私观念的温和转变：对公共价值观的评估

IF 1.1 4区管理学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada Pub Date : 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1111/capa.70005

Geneviève Morin, Étienne Charbonneau, Daniel E. Bromberg

{"title":"加拿大人对隐私观念的温和转变：对公共价值观的评估","authors":"Geneviève Morin, Étienne Charbonneau, Daniel E. Bromberg","doi":"10.1111/capa.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy is seldom regarded as a public value or subjected to empirical analysis in public administration. This study parsed 35 empirical research studies on privacy—encompassing more than 47 000 respondents—which were retrieved from Canada's Public Opinion Research Archives between 2007 and 2024. These government-sponsored studies were analyzed by the types of encounters, theoretical relationships, and citizen public value assessment. For Canadians, privacy is especially salient for state-initiated exchanges with citizens. It is thought of as a context more than as a cause or an outcome. It qualifies as a value, in tension with others, rather than as consensus or a contested value.","PeriodicalId":46145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","volume":"68 1","pages":"41-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadians' Gentle Shift of Opinions on Privacy: An Assessment of Public Values\",\"authors\":\"Geneviève Morin, Étienne Charbonneau, Daniel E. Bromberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/capa.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Privacy is seldom regarded as a public value or subjected to empirical analysis in public administration. This study parsed 35 empirical research studies on privacy—encompassing more than 47 000 respondents—which were retrieved from Canada's Public Opinion Research Archives between 2007 and 2024. These government-sponsored studies were analyzed by the types of encounters, theoretical relationships, and citizen public value assessment. For Canadians, privacy is especially salient for state-initiated exchanges with citizens. It is thought of as a context more than as a cause or an outcome. It qualifies as a value, in tension with others, rather than as consensus or a contested value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"41-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.70005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.70005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在公共管理中，隐私很少被视为一种公共价值，也很少受到实证分析。这项研究分析了35项关于隐私的实证研究，涵盖了47000多名受访者，这些研究来自2007年至2024年加拿大民意研究档案。这些政府资助的研究通过接触类型、理论关系和公民公共价值评估进行了分析。对加拿大人来说，在政府发起的与公民的交流中，隐私问题尤为突出。它被认为是一个背景，而不是一个原因或结果。它有资格作为一种价值观，在与他人的紧张关系中，而不是作为共识或有争议的价值观。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Canadians' Gentle Shift of Opinions on Privacy: An Assessment of Public Values

Privacy is seldom regarded as a public value or subjected to empirical analysis in public administration. This study parsed 35 empirical research studies on privacy—encompassing more than 47 000 respondents—which were retrieved from Canada's Public Opinion Research Archives between 2007 and 2024. These government-sponsored studies were analyzed by the types of encounters, theoretical relationships, and citizen public value assessment. For Canadians, privacy is especially salient for state-initiated exchanges with citizens. It is thought of as a context more than as a cause or an outcome. It qualifies as a value, in tension with others, rather than as consensus or a contested value.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada is the refereed scholarly publication of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). It covers executive, legislative, judicial and quasi-judicial functions at all three levels of Canadian government. Published quarterly, the journal focuses mainly on Canadian issues but also welcomes manuscripts which compare Canadian public sector institutions and practices with those in other countries or examine issues in other countries or international organizations which are of interest to the public administration community in Canada.