{"title":"远程医疗干预痴呆护理人员的可行性:治疗师的观点","authors":"Alison Walter, Kaylene Kilham, Briony Dow, Penny Rapaport, Gill Livingston, Michelle Kelly","doi":"10.1002/capr.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The STrAtegies for RelaTives (START) programme was designed in the United Kingdom to support informal dementia carers. This study was designed to assess therapists' perspectives on the feasibility of START in the Australian healthcare context in terms of its acceptability to therapists (i.e., confidence in delivery, perceived client rapport, and perceived change in client outcomes), its adaptation for delivery via telehealth, and integration with telehealth technologies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen therapists were randomly allocated to deliver START or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and commenced treatment with 18 carers (START: <i>n =</i> 13 overall, <i>n</i> = 7 via telehealth; CBT: <i>n =</i> 5 overall, <i>n</i> = 3 via telehealth). Mixed methods surveys were used to collect therapists' perspectives on acceptability and integration. Quantitative comparisons were made using independent sample <i>t</i>-tests, and qualitative responses were analysed using a theoretical semantic approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Postsession confidence in intervention delivery, but not client rapport or perceived change in client outcomes, was higher for START than CBT (<i>p</i> = 0.034). Postsession change in client outcomes, but not therapist confidence or client rapport, was lower for telehealth delivery (<i>p</i> = 0.043). START was a beneficial experience for therapists, with content fostering carer engagement; however, concerns included a high volume of programme content. While technological issues were thought to have a negative impact on client rapport, telehealth enabled access to care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>START was acceptable to therapists and can be effectively delivered via telehealth. Recourse to telephone-only-based care may reduce the impact of technological issues on acceptability outcomes for therapists.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a Telehealth Intervention for Dementia Carers: Therapist Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Alison Walter, Kaylene Kilham, Briony Dow, Penny Rapaport, Gill Livingston, Michelle Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The STrAtegies for RelaTives (START) programme was designed in the United Kingdom to support informal dementia carers. This study was designed to assess therapists' perspectives on the feasibility of START in the Australian healthcare context in terms of its acceptability to therapists (i.e., confidence in delivery, perceived client rapport, and perceived change in client outcomes), its adaptation for delivery via telehealth, and integration with telehealth technologies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fourteen therapists were randomly allocated to deliver START or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and commenced treatment with 18 carers (START: <i>n =</i> 13 overall, <i>n</i> = 7 via telehealth; CBT: <i>n =</i> 5 overall, <i>n</i> = 3 via telehealth). Mixed methods surveys were used to collect therapists' perspectives on acceptability and integration. Quantitative comparisons were made using independent sample <i>t</i>-tests, and qualitative responses were analysed using a theoretical semantic approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Postsession confidence in intervention delivery, but not client rapport or perceived change in client outcomes, was higher for START than CBT (<i>p</i> = 0.034). Postsession change in client outcomes, but not therapist confidence or client rapport, was lower for telehealth delivery (<i>p</i> = 0.043). START was a beneficial experience for therapists, with content fostering carer engagement; however, concerns included a high volume of programme content. While technological issues were thought to have a negative impact on client rapport, telehealth enabled access to care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>START was acceptable to therapists and can be effectively delivered via telehealth. Recourse to telephone-only-based care may reduce the impact of technological issues on acceptability outcomes for therapists.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.70024\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility of a Telehealth Intervention for Dementia Carers: Therapist Perspectives
Objectives
The STrAtegies for RelaTives (START) programme was designed in the United Kingdom to support informal dementia carers. This study was designed to assess therapists' perspectives on the feasibility of START in the Australian healthcare context in terms of its acceptability to therapists (i.e., confidence in delivery, perceived client rapport, and perceived change in client outcomes), its adaptation for delivery via telehealth, and integration with telehealth technologies.
Methods
Fourteen therapists were randomly allocated to deliver START or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and commenced treatment with 18 carers (START: n = 13 overall, n = 7 via telehealth; CBT: n = 5 overall, n = 3 via telehealth). Mixed methods surveys were used to collect therapists' perspectives on acceptability and integration. Quantitative comparisons were made using independent sample t-tests, and qualitative responses were analysed using a theoretical semantic approach.
Results
Postsession confidence in intervention delivery, but not client rapport or perceived change in client outcomes, was higher for START than CBT (p = 0.034). Postsession change in client outcomes, but not therapist confidence or client rapport, was lower for telehealth delivery (p = 0.043). START was a beneficial experience for therapists, with content fostering carer engagement; however, concerns included a high volume of programme content. While technological issues were thought to have a negative impact on client rapport, telehealth enabled access to care.
Conclusions
START was acceptable to therapists and can be effectively delivered via telehealth. Recourse to telephone-only-based care may reduce the impact of technological issues on acceptability outcomes for therapists.
期刊介绍:
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.