在一项随机个体对照观察盲法临床试验中,皮赘切除:剪刀切除与非烧蚀532nm lbo激光

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Ozan Haase, Charlotte Winkelmann-Schirmer, Petra Mrowka, Sven Krengel
{"title":"在一项随机个体对照观察盲法临床试验中,皮赘切除:剪刀切除与非烧蚀532nm lbo激光","authors":"Ozan Haase,&nbsp;Charlotte Winkelmann-Schirmer,&nbsp;Petra Mrowka,&nbsp;Sven Krengel","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fibroma pendulans, commonly known as skin tag, is a benign protrusion of connective tissue that often develops groupwise in areas subjected to mechanical friction. Although generally harmless, they can become cosmetically concerning or painful if infarcted. Traditional removal methods, such as electrocautery and cryotherapy, often result in hypopigmentation or scarring. Lasers became interesting for skin-tag removal, but are they really more effective than classical scissor snip exisions? This study aimed to compare the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient acceptance of scissor snip excision versus 532 nm LBO laser therapy for the removal of skin tags. 68 patients with a total of 1,257 fibromas located on the neck or axillae were treated. Each patient received both treatments in a randomized split-neck/axillar manner. Fibromas were either excised using scissors or treated with the non-ablative 532 nm LBO laser. Outcomes were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment, focusing on complete healing, patient preference, pain perception, and cosmetic results. At 12 weeks, the scissor excision group exhibited a significantly higher healing rate of 85% compared to 71% in the laser group (<i>p</i> = 0.00001). The adjusted overall response rate was 92.64% for scissor excision and 84.19% for laser treatment. Patient preference favored scissor excision, with 63% of patients opting for this method for future treatments, while 19% preferred the laser, and 18% were indifferent. Pain scores were lower for scissor excision (mean: 2.6) compared to laser treatment (mean: 3.42). Laser therapy was 39% faster than scissor excision when accounting for wound dressing, although it had higher rates of redness, hyper- and hypopigmentation. The bloodless nature of the laser and the absence of dressings were perceived as advantages, but the persistence of necrotic fibromas for up to three weeks was a notable drawback. Despite the perceived advantages of a bloodless and dressing-free procedure with the 532 nm LBO laser, scissor snip excision demonstrated superior healing outcomes, lower pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that scissor snip excision remains the gold standard for treating pedunculated fibromas, though further studies exploring the effect of the 532 nm laser on small disseminated fibromas and other laser modalities are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of skin tags: scissor excision versus non-ablative 532nm-LBO-laser in a randomized intraindividual controlled observer-blinded clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Ozan Haase,&nbsp;Charlotte Winkelmann-Schirmer,&nbsp;Petra Mrowka,&nbsp;Sven Krengel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fibroma pendulans, commonly known as skin tag, is a benign protrusion of connective tissue that often develops groupwise in areas subjected to mechanical friction. Although generally harmless, they can become cosmetically concerning or painful if infarcted. Traditional removal methods, such as electrocautery and cryotherapy, often result in hypopigmentation or scarring. Lasers became interesting for skin-tag removal, but are they really more effective than classical scissor snip exisions? This study aimed to compare the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient acceptance of scissor snip excision versus 532 nm LBO laser therapy for the removal of skin tags. 68 patients with a total of 1,257 fibromas located on the neck or axillae were treated. Each patient received both treatments in a randomized split-neck/axillar manner. Fibromas were either excised using scissors or treated with the non-ablative 532 nm LBO laser. Outcomes were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment, focusing on complete healing, patient preference, pain perception, and cosmetic results. At 12 weeks, the scissor excision group exhibited a significantly higher healing rate of 85% compared to 71% in the laser group (<i>p</i> = 0.00001). The adjusted overall response rate was 92.64% for scissor excision and 84.19% for laser treatment. Patient preference favored scissor excision, with 63% of patients opting for this method for future treatments, while 19% preferred the laser, and 18% were indifferent. Pain scores were lower for scissor excision (mean: 2.6) compared to laser treatment (mean: 3.42). Laser therapy was 39% faster than scissor excision when accounting for wound dressing, although it had higher rates of redness, hyper- and hypopigmentation. The bloodless nature of the laser and the absence of dressings were perceived as advantages, but the persistence of necrotic fibromas for up to three weeks was a notable drawback. Despite the perceived advantages of a bloodless and dressing-free procedure with the 532 nm LBO laser, scissor snip excision demonstrated superior healing outcomes, lower pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that scissor snip excision remains the gold standard for treating pedunculated fibromas, though further studies exploring the effect of the 532 nm laser on small disseminated fibromas and other laser modalities are warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04242-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钟摆纤维瘤,俗称皮赘,是结缔组织的一种良性突出,常在机械摩擦区域成组发展。虽然它们通常是无害的,但如果梗死,它们可能会引起美容方面的担忧或疼痛。传统的去除方法,如电灼和冷冻疗法,通常会导致色素沉着或疤痕。激光在去除皮肤赘肉方面变得很有趣,但它们真的比传统的剪刀剪切除更有效吗?本研究旨在比较剪刀剪切除与532 nm LBO激光治疗的疗效、愈合结果和患者接受度。68例患者共1,257个位于颈部或腋窝的纤维瘤被治疗。每位患者以随机裂颈/腋窝方式接受两种治疗。纤维瘤要么用剪刀切除,要么用非烧蚀性532 nm LBO激光治疗。结果在治疗后4周和12周进行评估,重点是完全愈合,患者偏好,疼痛感觉和美容结果。12周时,剪刀切除组的愈合率为85%,而激光组为71% (p = 0.00001)。调整后的总有效率,剪刀切除为92.64%,激光治疗为84.19%。患者更倾向于剪刀切除,63%的患者选择这种方法进行未来的治疗,而19%的患者更喜欢激光,18%的患者无所谓。与激光治疗(平均3.42分)相比,剪刀切除的疼痛评分(平均2.6分)较低。考虑到伤口敷料,激光治疗比剪刀切除快39%,尽管它有更高的发红、色素沉着和色素沉着率。激光的无血特性和无敷料被认为是优点,但坏死纤维瘤的持续长达三周是一个明显的缺点。尽管使用532 nm LBO激光的无血和无敷料手术具有明显的优势,但剪刀剪切除术显示出更好的愈合效果,更低的疼痛评分和更高的患者满意度。这些发现表明,剪刀剪切除仍然是治疗带蒂纤维瘤的金标准,尽管进一步研究探索532 nm激光对小弥散性纤维瘤和其他激光方式的影响是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removal of skin tags: scissor excision versus non-ablative 532nm-LBO-laser in a randomized intraindividual controlled observer-blinded clinical trial

Fibroma pendulans, commonly known as skin tag, is a benign protrusion of connective tissue that often develops groupwise in areas subjected to mechanical friction. Although generally harmless, they can become cosmetically concerning or painful if infarcted. Traditional removal methods, such as electrocautery and cryotherapy, often result in hypopigmentation or scarring. Lasers became interesting for skin-tag removal, but are they really more effective than classical scissor snip exisions? This study aimed to compare the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient acceptance of scissor snip excision versus 532 nm LBO laser therapy for the removal of skin tags. 68 patients with a total of 1,257 fibromas located on the neck or axillae were treated. Each patient received both treatments in a randomized split-neck/axillar manner. Fibromas were either excised using scissors or treated with the non-ablative 532 nm LBO laser. Outcomes were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment, focusing on complete healing, patient preference, pain perception, and cosmetic results. At 12 weeks, the scissor excision group exhibited a significantly higher healing rate of 85% compared to 71% in the laser group (p = 0.00001). The adjusted overall response rate was 92.64% for scissor excision and 84.19% for laser treatment. Patient preference favored scissor excision, with 63% of patients opting for this method for future treatments, while 19% preferred the laser, and 18% were indifferent. Pain scores were lower for scissor excision (mean: 2.6) compared to laser treatment (mean: 3.42). Laser therapy was 39% faster than scissor excision when accounting for wound dressing, although it had higher rates of redness, hyper- and hypopigmentation. The bloodless nature of the laser and the absence of dressings were perceived as advantages, but the persistence of necrotic fibromas for up to three weeks was a notable drawback. Despite the perceived advantages of a bloodless and dressing-free procedure with the 532 nm LBO laser, scissor snip excision demonstrated superior healing outcomes, lower pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that scissor snip excision remains the gold standard for treating pedunculated fibromas, though further studies exploring the effect of the 532 nm laser on small disseminated fibromas and other laser modalities are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信