Laura Illia , Rafael Ballester-Ripoll , Anika K. Clausen
{"title":"编造企业社会责任真实性:人工智能时代社会化媒体企业社会责任传播的虚幻真实效应","authors":"Laura Illia , Rafael Ballester-Ripoll , Anika K. Clausen","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communication via social media offers significant opportunities for organizations. Posts by third-party stakeholders allow for critical evaluation of CSR efforts, fostering authenticity through the anonymous, collective sharing of personal experiences. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), which facilitate the rapid and cost-effective creation of bot-driven posts, raises concerns about whether an increasing number of fabricated CSR messages could linearly influence an audience’s perception of a company’s CSR authenticity. We base our hypotheses on the Illusory Truth Effect, suggesting that perceived authenticity can increase with exposure to more messages. However, this effect only continues up to a certain tipping point, after which it plateaus. We tested our hypotheses in a study with 480 participants, presenting AI-generated CSR testimonials about Shell to three groups: zero, low, and high exposure. We found a significant increase in perceived CSR authenticity in the low exposure group compared to the zero group, with the effect tapering off in the high exposure group. We conclude that LLMs can effectively replace human-written CSR messages for a fraction of a cent, yet the main strength of LLMs—sheer volume, leading to repeated exposure—is unlikely to become a concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 102588"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fabricating CSR authenticity: The Illusory Truth Effect of CSR communication on social media in the AI era\",\"authors\":\"Laura Illia , Rafael Ballester-Ripoll , Anika K. Clausen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communication via social media offers significant opportunities for organizations. Posts by third-party stakeholders allow for critical evaluation of CSR efforts, fostering authenticity through the anonymous, collective sharing of personal experiences. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), which facilitate the rapid and cost-effective creation of bot-driven posts, raises concerns about whether an increasing number of fabricated CSR messages could linearly influence an audience’s perception of a company’s CSR authenticity. We base our hypotheses on the Illusory Truth Effect, suggesting that perceived authenticity can increase with exposure to more messages. However, this effect only continues up to a certain tipping point, after which it plateaus. We tested our hypotheses in a study with 480 participants, presenting AI-generated CSR testimonials about Shell to three groups: zero, low, and high exposure. We found a significant increase in perceived CSR authenticity in the low exposure group compared to the zero group, with the effect tapering off in the high exposure group. We conclude that LLMs can effectively replace human-written CSR messages for a fraction of a cent, yet the main strength of LLMs—sheer volume, leading to repeated exposure—is unlikely to become a concern.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Relations Review\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 102588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000505\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fabricating CSR authenticity: The Illusory Truth Effect of CSR communication on social media in the AI era
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communication via social media offers significant opportunities for organizations. Posts by third-party stakeholders allow for critical evaluation of CSR efforts, fostering authenticity through the anonymous, collective sharing of personal experiences. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), which facilitate the rapid and cost-effective creation of bot-driven posts, raises concerns about whether an increasing number of fabricated CSR messages could linearly influence an audience’s perception of a company’s CSR authenticity. We base our hypotheses on the Illusory Truth Effect, suggesting that perceived authenticity can increase with exposure to more messages. However, this effect only continues up to a certain tipping point, after which it plateaus. We tested our hypotheses in a study with 480 participants, presenting AI-generated CSR testimonials about Shell to three groups: zero, low, and high exposure. We found a significant increase in perceived CSR authenticity in the low exposure group compared to the zero group, with the effect tapering off in the high exposure group. We conclude that LLMs can effectively replace human-written CSR messages for a fraction of a cent, yet the main strength of LLMs—sheer volume, leading to repeated exposure—is unlikely to become a concern.
期刊介绍:
The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.