识别和理解碳封存的关键景观如何响应低碳能源生产的发展:为最佳土地规划和管理策略提供信息的洞察力

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Susan Waldron , Kate Heal , Amira Elayouty , Hugh Flowers , E. Marian Scott , Ying Zheng , Helen Murray , Martin Coleman , Antony Phin , Amy Pickard
{"title":"识别和理解碳封存的关键景观如何响应低碳能源生产的发展:为最佳土地规划和管理策略提供信息的洞察力","authors":"Susan Waldron ,&nbsp;Kate Heal ,&nbsp;Amira Elayouty ,&nbsp;Hugh Flowers ,&nbsp;E. Marian Scott ,&nbsp;Ying Zheng ,&nbsp;Helen Murray ,&nbsp;Martin Coleman ,&nbsp;Antony Phin ,&nbsp;Amy Pickard","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wind farms can mitigate increasing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by fossil-fuel free energy generation. However, landscape disturbance during development must not have lasting impacts on C sequestration, an ecosystem service. To understand how a critical carbon landscape responds to wind farm development, we monitored for 10 years dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export in five catchments draining Europe's second largest onshore wind farm, Whitelee, UK. The DOC flux trend and seasonality were modelled using Generalised Additive and Mixed Models, novelly using first derivatives of trends to identify responses to wind farm development. Unlike a nearby, minimally-disturbed catchment, Whitelee catchment DOC fluxes increased over the decade, tracking successive phases of wind farm development, particularly forest felling to enable turbine location. Inter-catchment differences in the rate of DOC flux, where slowing suggests recovery (not always evident), reflect differing intensity (timing and spatial reach) of catchment disturbance. However, increased DOC flux approximated 3.5 % maximum of C likely sequestered and therefore soil C sequestration is unlikely to be compromised unless the soils are highly degraded and close to not being a C sink. For the greenest energy transition, responsible planning should minimise C losses, even when small, and in a critical landscape may require consideration of impact on other ecosystem services. For example, deterioration in quality of potable water supply occurred within the observation period. Ongoing provisioning of multiple ecosystem services from critical carbon landscapes requires planning. We demonstrate an example of such an approach for wind farm development considering in priority order carbon storage, forest products, potable water supply. Our findings are relevant to integrated landscape planning and management in temperate and high latitude/altitude peatlands globally that are subject to wind energy development and/or forest felling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 125063"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying and understanding how critical landscapes for carbon sequestration respond to development for low carbon energy production: Insight to inform optimal land planning and management strategies\",\"authors\":\"Susan Waldron ,&nbsp;Kate Heal ,&nbsp;Amira Elayouty ,&nbsp;Hugh Flowers ,&nbsp;E. Marian Scott ,&nbsp;Ying Zheng ,&nbsp;Helen Murray ,&nbsp;Martin Coleman ,&nbsp;Antony Phin ,&nbsp;Amy Pickard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wind farms can mitigate increasing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by fossil-fuel free energy generation. However, landscape disturbance during development must not have lasting impacts on C sequestration, an ecosystem service. To understand how a critical carbon landscape responds to wind farm development, we monitored for 10 years dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export in five catchments draining Europe's second largest onshore wind farm, Whitelee, UK. The DOC flux trend and seasonality were modelled using Generalised Additive and Mixed Models, novelly using first derivatives of trends to identify responses to wind farm development. Unlike a nearby, minimally-disturbed catchment, Whitelee catchment DOC fluxes increased over the decade, tracking successive phases of wind farm development, particularly forest felling to enable turbine location. Inter-catchment differences in the rate of DOC flux, where slowing suggests recovery (not always evident), reflect differing intensity (timing and spatial reach) of catchment disturbance. However, increased DOC flux approximated 3.5 % maximum of C likely sequestered and therefore soil C sequestration is unlikely to be compromised unless the soils are highly degraded and close to not being a C sink. For the greenest energy transition, responsible planning should minimise C losses, even when small, and in a critical landscape may require consideration of impact on other ecosystem services. For example, deterioration in quality of potable water supply occurred within the observation period. Ongoing provisioning of multiple ecosystem services from critical carbon landscapes requires planning. We demonstrate an example of such an approach for wind farm development considering in priority order carbon storage, forest products, potable water supply. Our findings are relevant to integrated landscape planning and management in temperate and high latitude/altitude peatlands globally that are subject to wind energy development and/or forest felling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"385 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125063\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725010394\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725010394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风力发电场可以通过无化石燃料的能源发电来减少不断增加的二氧化碳排放。然而,开发过程中的景观干扰不能对生态系统服务碳固存产生持久的影响。为了了解关键的碳景观对风电场发展的反应,我们对英国怀特利欧洲第二大陆上风电场的五个集水区的溶解有机碳(DOC)出口进行了10年的监测。DOC通量趋势和季节性使用广义加性和混合模型建模,新颖地使用趋势的一阶导数来确定对风电场开发的响应。与附近受干扰最小的集水区不同,Whitelee集水区的DOC通量在过去十年中有所增加,跟踪风力发电场开发的连续阶段,特别是为了安装涡轮机而砍伐森林。DOC通量在集水区间的差异反映了集水区扰动的不同强度(时间和空间范围),其中减缓表明恢复(并不总是明显的)。然而,增加的DOC通量可能最大封存了约3.5%的碳,因此土壤碳封存不太可能受到损害,除非土壤高度退化并接近不成为碳汇。为了实现最绿色的能源转型,负责任的规划应尽量减少碳损失,即使碳损失很小,而且在关键景观中可能需要考虑对其他生态系统服务的影响。例如,在观察期间发生了饮用水供应质量的恶化。从关键碳景观持续提供多种生态系统服务需要规划。我们展示了一个风力发电场开发方法的例子,优先考虑碳储存,森林产品,饮用水供应。我们的研究结果与全球温带和高纬度/高海拔泥炭地的综合景观规划和管理有关,这些泥炭地受到风能开发和/或森林砍伐的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying and understanding how critical landscapes for carbon sequestration respond to development for low carbon energy production: Insight to inform optimal land planning and management strategies

Identifying and understanding how critical landscapes for carbon sequestration respond to development for low carbon energy production: Insight to inform optimal land planning and management strategies
Wind farms can mitigate increasing CO2 emissions by fossil-fuel free energy generation. However, landscape disturbance during development must not have lasting impacts on C sequestration, an ecosystem service. To understand how a critical carbon landscape responds to wind farm development, we monitored for 10 years dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export in five catchments draining Europe's second largest onshore wind farm, Whitelee, UK. The DOC flux trend and seasonality were modelled using Generalised Additive and Mixed Models, novelly using first derivatives of trends to identify responses to wind farm development. Unlike a nearby, minimally-disturbed catchment, Whitelee catchment DOC fluxes increased over the decade, tracking successive phases of wind farm development, particularly forest felling to enable turbine location. Inter-catchment differences in the rate of DOC flux, where slowing suggests recovery (not always evident), reflect differing intensity (timing and spatial reach) of catchment disturbance. However, increased DOC flux approximated 3.5 % maximum of C likely sequestered and therefore soil C sequestration is unlikely to be compromised unless the soils are highly degraded and close to not being a C sink. For the greenest energy transition, responsible planning should minimise C losses, even when small, and in a critical landscape may require consideration of impact on other ecosystem services. For example, deterioration in quality of potable water supply occurred within the observation period. Ongoing provisioning of multiple ecosystem services from critical carbon landscapes requires planning. We demonstrate an example of such an approach for wind farm development considering in priority order carbon storage, forest products, potable water supply. Our findings are relevant to integrated landscape planning and management in temperate and high latitude/altitude peatlands globally that are subject to wind energy development and/or forest felling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信