山区SMAP土壤水分实时估算及其对降雨径流模拟的影响

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Huicong An , Chaojun Ouyang , Xiaoqing Chen
{"title":"山区SMAP土壤水分实时估算及其对降雨径流模拟的影响","authors":"Huicong An ,&nbsp;Chaojun Ouyang ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The role of soil moisture (SM) in determining natural hazards such as flash floods, debris flows, and landslides in mountainous areas is critical. However, the operational capacity to monitor SM in real-time is constrained by the temporal resolution of low-Earth orbit satellite platforms. To address this, we developed a machine learning (ML) framework that fills Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) mission SM’s temporal gaps during 1 ∼ 3 days satellite revisit intervals by generating real-time SM estimates at 36 km resolution in the Hengduan Mountain region (HDMR). The accuracy of the algorithms was evaluated, and their impact on rainfall-runoff simulation was examined. The seven ML models have been found to perform significantly better overall correlation than the direct estimation method. Out of these models, the Long short-term memory (LSTM) network model has been identified as the top performer, exhibiting the lowest RMSE of 0.021 m<sup>3</sup>·m<sup>−3</sup>. The error spatial patterns of these models align with the recommended quality of the SMAP product, where sparse vegetation regions show higher accuracy of inversion compared to dense vegetation regions. Additionally, verification work in the Wake catchment indicates that SM can vary significantly over the estimation period of 1 ∼ 3 days, and the discharge hydrographs simulated using real-time and delayed SM values exhibit notable differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"660 ","pages":"Article 133487"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time estimation of SMAP soil moisture in mountainous areas and its impact on rainfall-runoff simulation\",\"authors\":\"Huicong An ,&nbsp;Chaojun Ouyang ,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The role of soil moisture (SM) in determining natural hazards such as flash floods, debris flows, and landslides in mountainous areas is critical. However, the operational capacity to monitor SM in real-time is constrained by the temporal resolution of low-Earth orbit satellite platforms. To address this, we developed a machine learning (ML) framework that fills Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) mission SM’s temporal gaps during 1 ∼ 3 days satellite revisit intervals by generating real-time SM estimates at 36 km resolution in the Hengduan Mountain region (HDMR). The accuracy of the algorithms was evaluated, and their impact on rainfall-runoff simulation was examined. The seven ML models have been found to perform significantly better overall correlation than the direct estimation method. Out of these models, the Long short-term memory (LSTM) network model has been identified as the top performer, exhibiting the lowest RMSE of 0.021 m<sup>3</sup>·m<sup>−3</sup>. The error spatial patterns of these models align with the recommended quality of the SMAP product, where sparse vegetation regions show higher accuracy of inversion compared to dense vegetation regions. Additionally, verification work in the Wake catchment indicates that SM can vary significantly over the estimation period of 1 ∼ 3 days, and the discharge hydrographs simulated using real-time and delayed SM values exhibit notable differences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"660 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942500825X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942500825X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤湿度在确定山洪暴发、泥石流和山体滑坡等自然灾害方面的作用至关重要。然而,低地球轨道卫星平台的时间分辨率限制了实时监测SM的操作能力。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个机器学习(ML)框架,通过生成横断山区(HDMR) 36公里分辨率的实时SM估计,在1 ~ 3天的卫星重访间隔内填补土壤湿度主动式和被动式(SMAP)任务SM的时间缺口。对算法的精度进行了评价,并对其对降雨径流模拟的影响进行了检验。七个ML模型的总体相关性明显优于直接估计方法。在这些模型中,长短期记忆(LSTM)网络模型表现最好,RMSE最低,为0.021 m3·m−3。这些模型的误差空间格局与SMAP产品的推荐质量一致,其中植被稀疏区域的反演精度高于植被密集区域。此外,Wake流域的验证工作表明,在1 ~ 3天的估计期内,SM可以发生显著变化,使用实时和延迟SM值模拟的流量水文表现出显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-time estimation of SMAP soil moisture in mountainous areas and its impact on rainfall-runoff simulation
The role of soil moisture (SM) in determining natural hazards such as flash floods, debris flows, and landslides in mountainous areas is critical. However, the operational capacity to monitor SM in real-time is constrained by the temporal resolution of low-Earth orbit satellite platforms. To address this, we developed a machine learning (ML) framework that fills Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) mission SM’s temporal gaps during 1 ∼ 3 days satellite revisit intervals by generating real-time SM estimates at 36 km resolution in the Hengduan Mountain region (HDMR). The accuracy of the algorithms was evaluated, and their impact on rainfall-runoff simulation was examined. The seven ML models have been found to perform significantly better overall correlation than the direct estimation method. Out of these models, the Long short-term memory (LSTM) network model has been identified as the top performer, exhibiting the lowest RMSE of 0.021 m3·m−3. The error spatial patterns of these models align with the recommended quality of the SMAP product, where sparse vegetation regions show higher accuracy of inversion compared to dense vegetation regions. Additionally, verification work in the Wake catchment indicates that SM can vary significantly over the estimation period of 1 ∼ 3 days, and the discharge hydrographs simulated using real-time and delayed SM values exhibit notable differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信