不同土壤类型和湿度条件下天然气管道泄漏移动测量方案的性能

IF 5.5 0 ENERGY & FUELS
G. Venkata Rao , Richard S. Kolodziej IV , Daniel J. Zimmerle , Kathleen M. Smits
{"title":"不同土壤类型和湿度条件下天然气管道泄漏移动测量方案的性能","authors":"G. Venkata Rao ,&nbsp;Richard S. Kolodziej IV ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Zimmerle ,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Smits","doi":"10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advanced leak detection (ALD) solutions for natural gas (NG) play a crucial role in swiftly identifying leaks to mitigate risks, costs, and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. Despite recent advancements in CH<sub>4</sub> leak detection, current ALD solutions often overlook the influence of subsurface and atmospheric conditions on gas behavior and, therefore, leak detection success. To address this gap, we conducted a series of controlled leak detection experiments under varying soil moisture levels and soil types, with two leak rates: low (0.5 slpm) and high (10 slpm), using walking, driving, and simulated UAV (UAV<sub>sim</sub>) surveys. The performance of these methods was evaluated using the probability of detection (POD). Results indicated that the POD of walking, driving, and UAV<sub>sim</sub> surveys is highly influenced by soil moisture and type. Low moisture conditions have a 10–45 % higher POD than high moisture conditions at higher leak rates, depending on the soil type and survey method. Higher permeability soils result in a 10–18 % higher POD than the lower-permeability soil tested within 5 m of the pipeline centerline. As the distance from the centerline increases, the magnitude of the impact grows, resulting in PODs 40–60 % lower than those along the centerline itself. Similarly, at low leak rates, the impact of high moisture and low permeability becomes more pronounced. Based on averages across all soil types and survey deployment platforms, the POD under dry soil conditions at a high leak rate is 20–40 % higher than at a low leak rate. Results further demonstrate the influence of the detection threshold, especially for low leak rates, where a 0.1 ppm increase in the detection threshold can reduce the POD by 50–60 % under moist soil conditions. These findings underscore the importance of considering the interplay between soil and operational conditions to enhance CH<sub>4</sub> leak detection success. Emission measurement solutions can therefore use this knowledge to establish performance metrics that account for variations in soil conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100568,"journal":{"name":"Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 205650"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of mobile survey solutions for natural gas pipeline leaks under different soil type and moisture conditions\",\"authors\":\"G. Venkata Rao ,&nbsp;Richard S. Kolodziej IV ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Zimmerle ,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Smits\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advanced leak detection (ALD) solutions for natural gas (NG) play a crucial role in swiftly identifying leaks to mitigate risks, costs, and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. Despite recent advancements in CH<sub>4</sub> leak detection, current ALD solutions often overlook the influence of subsurface and atmospheric conditions on gas behavior and, therefore, leak detection success. To address this gap, we conducted a series of controlled leak detection experiments under varying soil moisture levels and soil types, with two leak rates: low (0.5 slpm) and high (10 slpm), using walking, driving, and simulated UAV (UAV<sub>sim</sub>) surveys. The performance of these methods was evaluated using the probability of detection (POD). Results indicated that the POD of walking, driving, and UAV<sub>sim</sub> surveys is highly influenced by soil moisture and type. Low moisture conditions have a 10–45 % higher POD than high moisture conditions at higher leak rates, depending on the soil type and survey method. Higher permeability soils result in a 10–18 % higher POD than the lower-permeability soil tested within 5 m of the pipeline centerline. As the distance from the centerline increases, the magnitude of the impact grows, resulting in PODs 40–60 % lower than those along the centerline itself. Similarly, at low leak rates, the impact of high moisture and low permeability becomes more pronounced. Based on averages across all soil types and survey deployment platforms, the POD under dry soil conditions at a high leak rate is 20–40 % higher than at a low leak rate. Results further demonstrate the influence of the detection threshold, especially for low leak rates, where a 0.1 ppm increase in the detection threshold can reduce the POD by 50–60 % under moist soil conditions. These findings underscore the importance of considering the interplay between soil and operational conditions to enhance CH<sub>4</sub> leak detection success. Emission measurement solutions can therefore use this knowledge to establish performance metrics that account for variations in soil conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 205650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908925001141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908925001141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先进的天然气泄漏检测(ALD)解决方案在快速识别泄漏以降低风险、成本和甲烷(CH4)排放方面发挥着至关重要的作用。尽管在CH4泄漏检测方面取得了最新进展,但目前的ALD解决方案往往忽略了地下和大气条件对气体行为的影响,因此无法成功检测泄漏。为了解决这一差距,我们在不同的土壤湿度水平和土壤类型下进行了一系列控制泄漏检测实验,使用步行,驾驶和模拟无人机(UAVsim)调查进行了两种泄漏率:低(0.5 slpm)和高(10 slpm)。用检测概率(POD)评价了这些方法的性能。结果表明,步行、驾车和UAVsim调查的POD受土壤湿度和土壤类型的影响较大。根据土壤类型和调查方法,低湿度条件下的POD比高湿度条件下的POD高10 - 45%。在管道中心线5 m范围内,高渗透性土壤的POD比低渗透性土壤高10 - 18%。随着离中心线距离的增加,冲击的强度也在增加,导致pod比沿中心线本身的pod低40 - 60%。同样,在低泄漏率下,高湿度和低渗透率的影响变得更加明显。根据所有土壤类型和调查部署平台的平均值,高泄漏率下干燥土壤条件下的POD比低泄漏率下高20 - 40%。结果进一步证明了检测阈值的影响,特别是在低泄漏率的情况下,在潮湿土壤条件下,检测阈值每增加0.1 ppm, POD就会减少50 - 60%。这些发现强调了考虑土壤和操作条件之间的相互作用对提高CH4泄漏检测成功率的重要性。因此,排放测量解决方案可以利用这些知识来建立考虑土壤条件变化的性能指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of mobile survey solutions for natural gas pipeline leaks under different soil type and moisture conditions
Advanced leak detection (ALD) solutions for natural gas (NG) play a crucial role in swiftly identifying leaks to mitigate risks, costs, and methane (CH4) emissions. Despite recent advancements in CH4 leak detection, current ALD solutions often overlook the influence of subsurface and atmospheric conditions on gas behavior and, therefore, leak detection success. To address this gap, we conducted a series of controlled leak detection experiments under varying soil moisture levels and soil types, with two leak rates: low (0.5 slpm) and high (10 slpm), using walking, driving, and simulated UAV (UAVsim) surveys. The performance of these methods was evaluated using the probability of detection (POD). Results indicated that the POD of walking, driving, and UAVsim surveys is highly influenced by soil moisture and type. Low moisture conditions have a 10–45 % higher POD than high moisture conditions at higher leak rates, depending on the soil type and survey method. Higher permeability soils result in a 10–18 % higher POD than the lower-permeability soil tested within 5 m of the pipeline centerline. As the distance from the centerline increases, the magnitude of the impact grows, resulting in PODs 40–60 % lower than those along the centerline itself. Similarly, at low leak rates, the impact of high moisture and low permeability becomes more pronounced. Based on averages across all soil types and survey deployment platforms, the POD under dry soil conditions at a high leak rate is 20–40 % higher than at a low leak rate. Results further demonstrate the influence of the detection threshold, especially for low leak rates, where a 0.1 ppm increase in the detection threshold can reduce the POD by 50–60 % under moist soil conditions. These findings underscore the importance of considering the interplay between soil and operational conditions to enhance CH4 leak detection success. Emission measurement solutions can therefore use this knowledge to establish performance metrics that account for variations in soil conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信