Adam X. Maihofer , Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier , Marissa A. Kellogg , Victoria C. Merritt
{"title":"评估和比较创伤性脑损伤数据来源在VA百万退伍军人计划:描述性流行病学研究","authors":"Adam X. Maihofer , Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier , Marissa A. Kellogg , Victoria C. Merritt","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.04.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the increased use and availability of electronic health record (EHR) data, population-based traumatic brain injury (TBI) research has received growing attention. However, a key challenge emerging from this research has been accurate ascertainment of TBI case/control status. While International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes constitute a widely used source of data, their validity may vary by clinic and provider. Examining other TBI data sources from epidemiological databases may help ascertain the value of ICD codes. Within the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP), TBI data is available from several data sources. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of TBI data sources available within MVP and to evaluate the performance characteristics of these variables. Analyses included up to 657,790 MVP-enrolled Veterans. TBI status (i.e., “TBI” vs. “No TBI”) was examined using several different variables: two variables from the MVP Baseline Survey; one variable from the MVP Lifestyle Survey; TBI ICD codes; and two variables from the VA TBI Screening and Evaluation Program. Several key findings emerged: (1) the availability of TBI data varied across data sources; (2) there were significant differences in TBI prevalence by sex, ancestry, and military service era for all TBI variables; (3) sensitivity and specificity varied considerably across TBI variables; and (4) combining TBI data sources (e.g., defining a TBI case using ICD codes <em>and</em> survey data) resulted in variables with stronger performance characteristics. Findings speak to the power of combining multiple data sources when retrospectively assessing TBI in the EHR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"187 ","pages":"Pages 85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation and comparison of traumatic brain injury data sources within the VA Million Veteran Program: A descriptive epidemiological study\",\"authors\":\"Adam X. Maihofer , Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier , Marissa A. Kellogg , Victoria C. Merritt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.04.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the increased use and availability of electronic health record (EHR) data, population-based traumatic brain injury (TBI) research has received growing attention. However, a key challenge emerging from this research has been accurate ascertainment of TBI case/control status. While International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes constitute a widely used source of data, their validity may vary by clinic and provider. Examining other TBI data sources from epidemiological databases may help ascertain the value of ICD codes. Within the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP), TBI data is available from several data sources. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of TBI data sources available within MVP and to evaluate the performance characteristics of these variables. Analyses included up to 657,790 MVP-enrolled Veterans. TBI status (i.e., “TBI” vs. “No TBI”) was examined using several different variables: two variables from the MVP Baseline Survey; one variable from the MVP Lifestyle Survey; TBI ICD codes; and two variables from the VA TBI Screening and Evaluation Program. Several key findings emerged: (1) the availability of TBI data varied across data sources; (2) there were significant differences in TBI prevalence by sex, ancestry, and military service era for all TBI variables; (3) sensitivity and specificity varied considerably across TBI variables; and (4) combining TBI data sources (e.g., defining a TBI case using ICD codes <em>and</em> survey data) resulted in variables with stronger performance characteristics. Findings speak to the power of combining multiple data sources when retrospectively assessing TBI in the EHR.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 85-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625002754\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625002754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An evaluation and comparison of traumatic brain injury data sources within the VA Million Veteran Program: A descriptive epidemiological study
With the increased use and availability of electronic health record (EHR) data, population-based traumatic brain injury (TBI) research has received growing attention. However, a key challenge emerging from this research has been accurate ascertainment of TBI case/control status. While International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes constitute a widely used source of data, their validity may vary by clinic and provider. Examining other TBI data sources from epidemiological databases may help ascertain the value of ICD codes. Within the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP), TBI data is available from several data sources. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of TBI data sources available within MVP and to evaluate the performance characteristics of these variables. Analyses included up to 657,790 MVP-enrolled Veterans. TBI status (i.e., “TBI” vs. “No TBI”) was examined using several different variables: two variables from the MVP Baseline Survey; one variable from the MVP Lifestyle Survey; TBI ICD codes; and two variables from the VA TBI Screening and Evaluation Program. Several key findings emerged: (1) the availability of TBI data varied across data sources; (2) there were significant differences in TBI prevalence by sex, ancestry, and military service era for all TBI variables; (3) sensitivity and specificity varied considerably across TBI variables; and (4) combining TBI data sources (e.g., defining a TBI case using ICD codes and survey data) resulted in variables with stronger performance characteristics. Findings speak to the power of combining multiple data sources when retrospectively assessing TBI in the EHR.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;