Dietmar M. Wohlbauer , Charles B. Hem , Caylin McCallick , Julie G. Arenberg
{"title":"结合通道失活与动态电流聚焦对人工耳蜗植入成人的言语表现","authors":"Dietmar M. Wohlbauer , Charles B. Hem , Caylin McCallick , Julie G. Arenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives and Methods:</h3><div>Cochlear implant listeners show difficulties in understanding speech in noise. Channel interactions from activating overlapping neural populations reduce the signal accuracy necessary to interpret complex signals. Optimizing programming strategies based on focused detection thresholds to reduce channel interactions has led to improved performance. In the current study, two previously suggested methods, channel deactivation and focused dynamic tripolar stimulation, were combined. Utilizing an automatic channel selection algorithm from focused detection threshold profiles, three cochlear implant programs were created with the same deactivated channels but varying proportions of channels employing focused stimulation, monopolar, dynamic focused and a mixed program. Thirteen ears in eleven adult cochlear implant listeners with Advanced Bionics HiRes90k devices were tested. Vowel identification and sentence perception in quiet and noise served as outcome measures, and the influences of listening experience, age, clinical consonant-nucleus-consonant performance, and perceptual thresholds on speech performance were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Across subjects, different degrees of focusing showed individual performance improvements for vowels and sentences over the monopolar program. Focused listening benefits were shown for individuals with less cochlear implant experience, and clinically poor performers seem to benefit more from focusing than good performers. However, only slight trends and no significant group improvements were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The current findings suggest that deactivating and focusing subsets of channels might improve speech performance for some individuals, especially poor performers, a possible effect of reduced channel interactions. The findings also show that performance is largely variable among individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"463 ","pages":"Article 109285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing\",\"authors\":\"Dietmar M. Wohlbauer , Charles B. Hem , Caylin McCallick , Julie G. Arenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives and Methods:</h3><div>Cochlear implant listeners show difficulties in understanding speech in noise. Channel interactions from activating overlapping neural populations reduce the signal accuracy necessary to interpret complex signals. Optimizing programming strategies based on focused detection thresholds to reduce channel interactions has led to improved performance. In the current study, two previously suggested methods, channel deactivation and focused dynamic tripolar stimulation, were combined. Utilizing an automatic channel selection algorithm from focused detection threshold profiles, three cochlear implant programs were created with the same deactivated channels but varying proportions of channels employing focused stimulation, monopolar, dynamic focused and a mixed program. Thirteen ears in eleven adult cochlear implant listeners with Advanced Bionics HiRes90k devices were tested. Vowel identification and sentence perception in quiet and noise served as outcome measures, and the influences of listening experience, age, clinical consonant-nucleus-consonant performance, and perceptual thresholds on speech performance were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Across subjects, different degrees of focusing showed individual performance improvements for vowels and sentences over the monopolar program. Focused listening benefits were shown for individuals with less cochlear implant experience, and clinically poor performers seem to benefit more from focusing than good performers. However, only slight trends and no significant group improvements were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The current findings suggest that deactivating and focusing subsets of channels might improve speech performance for some individuals, especially poor performers, a possible effect of reduced channel interactions. The findings also show that performance is largely variable among individuals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"463 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525001030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525001030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing
Objectives and Methods:
Cochlear implant listeners show difficulties in understanding speech in noise. Channel interactions from activating overlapping neural populations reduce the signal accuracy necessary to interpret complex signals. Optimizing programming strategies based on focused detection thresholds to reduce channel interactions has led to improved performance. In the current study, two previously suggested methods, channel deactivation and focused dynamic tripolar stimulation, were combined. Utilizing an automatic channel selection algorithm from focused detection threshold profiles, three cochlear implant programs were created with the same deactivated channels but varying proportions of channels employing focused stimulation, monopolar, dynamic focused and a mixed program. Thirteen ears in eleven adult cochlear implant listeners with Advanced Bionics HiRes90k devices were tested. Vowel identification and sentence perception in quiet and noise served as outcome measures, and the influences of listening experience, age, clinical consonant-nucleus-consonant performance, and perceptual thresholds on speech performance were assessed.
Results:
Across subjects, different degrees of focusing showed individual performance improvements for vowels and sentences over the monopolar program. Focused listening benefits were shown for individuals with less cochlear implant experience, and clinically poor performers seem to benefit more from focusing than good performers. However, only slight trends and no significant group improvements were observed.
Conclusion:
The current findings suggest that deactivating and focusing subsets of channels might improve speech performance for some individuals, especially poor performers, a possible effect of reduced channel interactions. The findings also show that performance is largely variable among individuals.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.