覆盖种植和后期施氮对大豆生长和生物固氮的影响

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Mohammad Jan Shamim , Anuj Chiluwal , Erin Haramoto , Seth Naeve , Hanna Poffenbarger , Larry C. Purcell , Montserrat Salmerón
{"title":"覆盖种植和后期施氮对大豆生长和生物固氮的影响","authors":"Mohammad Jan Shamim ,&nbsp;Anuj Chiluwal ,&nbsp;Erin Haramoto ,&nbsp;Seth Naeve ,&nbsp;Hanna Poffenbarger ,&nbsp;Larry C. Purcell ,&nbsp;Montserrat Salmerón","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context or problem</h3><div>Developing sustainable cultural practices that enhance soybean (<em>Glycine max</em> L. (Merr.)) productivity and seed protein concentration is critical. Previous research conducted during 2019 and 2020 (Fayetteville, Arkansas; Lexington, Kentucky; and St. Paul, Minnesota) found a significant effect of winter rotation (fallow vs. cereal cover crop with residue removed, CC) and N fertilizer applications during seed growth (N<sub>fert-R5</sub>; 202 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> applied vs. unfertilized control) on seed yield and protein concentration.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This follow-up research aimed at quantifying the effect of CC and N<sub>fert-R5</sub> on soybean in-season aboveground biomass and total N content, the percentage of N derived from the atmosphere (%, pNDFA), total biological N fixation (kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, BNF), and N concentration in developing seeds (mg N g<sup>-1</sup>, N<sub>seed</sub>). We hypothesized that CC would enhance soybean BNF compared to fallow and that N<sub>fert-R5</sub> would increase N<sub>seed</sub> without compromising BNF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Soybean aboveground biomass was sampled at the R2 and R6 developmental stages, and developing seeds were sampled four times from mid-R5 to R8 for analysis of total N concentration. The δ<sup>15</sup>N was analyzed in aboveground biomass and R8 seed samples from all treatments and in reference non-nodulating plants, and pNDFA was estimated based on the natural abundance technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CC increased pNDFA measured at the R2, R6, or R8 developmental stages in most instances but only increased BNF in harvested seed (BNF<sub>R8</sub>) in Arkansas due to an overall reduction in aboveground biomass and N content (10 – 50 % average reduction depending on the location and developmental stage) relative to soybean after winter fallow. Of interest, pronounced reductions in soybean in-season growth after the CC had a relatively small impact on soybean final yield. The N<sub>fert-R5</sub> increased N<sub>seed</sub> relative to the unfertilized control in the R5.5 developmental stage. However, N<sub>fert-R5</sub> reduced BNF at R6 (BNF<sub>R6</sub>) by 51–88 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in six out of 12 locations, year, and cultivar MG combinations, and increased BNF<sub>R6</sub> by 63–71 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in two cases. At harvest, N<sub>fert-R5</sub> reduced BNF<sub>R8</sub> by 23–96 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in six out of twelve locations, year, and MG combinations (p &lt; 0.10), and increased BNF<sub>R8</sub> by 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in one case.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our hypotheses were only partially supported. The CC increased pNDFA but did not enhance BNF in most cases. Similarly, N<sub>fert-R5</sub> increased seed N concentration but reduced both pNDFA and BNF in most cases.</div></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><div>While CC and N<sub>fert-R5</sub> have specific benefits, their overall impact on in-season biomass, nitrogen dynamics, and yield is complex and environment-specific.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"330 ","pages":"Article 109960"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the impact of cover cropping and late-season N applications on soybean growth and biological N fixation\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Jan Shamim ,&nbsp;Anuj Chiluwal ,&nbsp;Erin Haramoto ,&nbsp;Seth Naeve ,&nbsp;Hanna Poffenbarger ,&nbsp;Larry C. Purcell ,&nbsp;Montserrat Salmerón\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context or problem</h3><div>Developing sustainable cultural practices that enhance soybean (<em>Glycine max</em> L. (Merr.)) productivity and seed protein concentration is critical. Previous research conducted during 2019 and 2020 (Fayetteville, Arkansas; Lexington, Kentucky; and St. Paul, Minnesota) found a significant effect of winter rotation (fallow vs. cereal cover crop with residue removed, CC) and N fertilizer applications during seed growth (N<sub>fert-R5</sub>; 202 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> applied vs. unfertilized control) on seed yield and protein concentration.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This follow-up research aimed at quantifying the effect of CC and N<sub>fert-R5</sub> on soybean in-season aboveground biomass and total N content, the percentage of N derived from the atmosphere (%, pNDFA), total biological N fixation (kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, BNF), and N concentration in developing seeds (mg N g<sup>-1</sup>, N<sub>seed</sub>). We hypothesized that CC would enhance soybean BNF compared to fallow and that N<sub>fert-R5</sub> would increase N<sub>seed</sub> without compromising BNF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Soybean aboveground biomass was sampled at the R2 and R6 developmental stages, and developing seeds were sampled four times from mid-R5 to R8 for analysis of total N concentration. The δ<sup>15</sup>N was analyzed in aboveground biomass and R8 seed samples from all treatments and in reference non-nodulating plants, and pNDFA was estimated based on the natural abundance technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CC increased pNDFA measured at the R2, R6, or R8 developmental stages in most instances but only increased BNF in harvested seed (BNF<sub>R8</sub>) in Arkansas due to an overall reduction in aboveground biomass and N content (10 – 50 % average reduction depending on the location and developmental stage) relative to soybean after winter fallow. Of interest, pronounced reductions in soybean in-season growth after the CC had a relatively small impact on soybean final yield. The N<sub>fert-R5</sub> increased N<sub>seed</sub> relative to the unfertilized control in the R5.5 developmental stage. However, N<sub>fert-R5</sub> reduced BNF at R6 (BNF<sub>R6</sub>) by 51–88 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in six out of 12 locations, year, and cultivar MG combinations, and increased BNF<sub>R6</sub> by 63–71 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in two cases. At harvest, N<sub>fert-R5</sub> reduced BNF<sub>R8</sub> by 23–96 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in six out of twelve locations, year, and MG combinations (p &lt; 0.10), and increased BNF<sub>R8</sub> by 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in one case.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our hypotheses were only partially supported. The CC increased pNDFA but did not enhance BNF in most cases. Similarly, N<sub>fert-R5</sub> increased seed N concentration but reduced both pNDFA and BNF in most cases.</div></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><div>While CC and N<sub>fert-R5</sub> have specific benefits, their overall impact on in-season biomass, nitrogen dynamics, and yield is complex and environment-specific.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"330 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025002254\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025002254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景或问题发展可持续的栽培方法以提高大豆(Glycine max L. (Merr.))的生产力和种子蛋白质浓度至关重要。之前在2019年和2020年进行的研究(阿肯色州费耶特维尔;肯塔基州的列克星顿;和明尼苏达州圣保罗)发现冬季轮作(休耕vs.去除残茬的谷物覆盖作物,CC)和种子生长期间施用氮肥(Nfert-R5;202 kg 施氮量与未施肥对照)对种子产量和蛋白质浓度的影响。目的定量研究CC和Nfert-R5对大豆当季地上生物量、总氮含量、从大气中获取的氮百分比(%,pNDFA)、总生物固氮量(kg N ha -1, BNF)和发育种子中氮浓度(mg N g-1, Nseed)的影响。我们假设与休耕相比,CC可以提高大豆的生物固结度,而Nfert-R5可以在不影响生物固结度的情况下增加Nseed。方法在R2和R6发育阶段采集大豆地上生物量,在r5中期至R8期间采集4次大豆发育种子,测定全氮浓度。分析了各处理和对照非结瘤植物地上生物量和R8种子样品的δ15N,并基于自然丰度技术估算了pNDFA。结果在大多数情况下,CC增加了R2、R6或R8发育阶段的pNDFA,但只增加了阿肯色州收获种子(BNFR8)的BNF,这是由于冬季休耕后,相对于大豆,地上生物量和N含量总体减少(根据位置和发育阶段平均减少10 - 50% %)。有趣的是,CC后大豆当季生长的显著减少对大豆最终产量的影响相对较小。在R5.5发育阶段,Nfert-R5相对于未施肥的对照增加了Nseed。然而,在12个地点、年份和品种MG组合中,Nfert-R5在6个组合中使R6 (BNFR6)的BNF降低了51-88 kg N ha - 1,在2个组合中使BNFR6增加了63-71 kg N ha - 1。收获时,在12个地点、年份和MG组合中的6个(p <; 0.10),Nfert-R5使BNFR8减少了23-96 kg N ha - 1 (p <; 0.10),并使BNFR8增加了30 kg ha - 1。结论我们的假设仅得到部分支持。在大多数情况下,CC增加了pNDFA,但没有增加BNF。同样,在大多数情况下,Nfert-R5增加了种子N浓度,但降低了pNDFA和BNF。虽然CC和Nfert-R5具有特定的效益,但它们对季节生物量、氮动态和产量的总体影响是复杂的,并且具有环境特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the impact of cover cropping and late-season N applications on soybean growth and biological N fixation

Context or problem

Developing sustainable cultural practices that enhance soybean (Glycine max L. (Merr.)) productivity and seed protein concentration is critical. Previous research conducted during 2019 and 2020 (Fayetteville, Arkansas; Lexington, Kentucky; and St. Paul, Minnesota) found a significant effect of winter rotation (fallow vs. cereal cover crop with residue removed, CC) and N fertilizer applications during seed growth (Nfert-R5; 202 kg N ha−1 applied vs. unfertilized control) on seed yield and protein concentration.

Objective

This follow-up research aimed at quantifying the effect of CC and Nfert-R5 on soybean in-season aboveground biomass and total N content, the percentage of N derived from the atmosphere (%, pNDFA), total biological N fixation (kg N ha−1, BNF), and N concentration in developing seeds (mg N g-1, Nseed). We hypothesized that CC would enhance soybean BNF compared to fallow and that Nfert-R5 would increase Nseed without compromising BNF.

Methods

Soybean aboveground biomass was sampled at the R2 and R6 developmental stages, and developing seeds were sampled four times from mid-R5 to R8 for analysis of total N concentration. The δ15N was analyzed in aboveground biomass and R8 seed samples from all treatments and in reference non-nodulating plants, and pNDFA was estimated based on the natural abundance technique.

Results

The CC increased pNDFA measured at the R2, R6, or R8 developmental stages in most instances but only increased BNF in harvested seed (BNFR8) in Arkansas due to an overall reduction in aboveground biomass and N content (10 – 50 % average reduction depending on the location and developmental stage) relative to soybean after winter fallow. Of interest, pronounced reductions in soybean in-season growth after the CC had a relatively small impact on soybean final yield. The Nfert-R5 increased Nseed relative to the unfertilized control in the R5.5 developmental stage. However, Nfert-R5 reduced BNF at R6 (BNFR6) by 51–88 kg N ha−1 in six out of 12 locations, year, and cultivar MG combinations, and increased BNFR6 by 63–71 kg N ha−1 in two cases. At harvest, Nfert-R5 reduced BNFR8 by 23–96 kg N ha−1 in six out of twelve locations, year, and MG combinations (p < 0.10), and increased BNFR8 by 30 kg ha−1 in one case.

Conclusions

Our hypotheses were only partially supported. The CC increased pNDFA but did not enhance BNF in most cases. Similarly, Nfert-R5 increased seed N concentration but reduced both pNDFA and BNF in most cases.

Implications or significance

While CC and Nfert-R5 have specific benefits, their overall impact on in-season biomass, nitrogen dynamics, and yield is complex and environment-specific.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信