{"title":"在线平台零售商在政府监管的数字市场中的战略适应","authors":"Sarat Kumar Jena , Purushottam Meena","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the strategic decisions of online platform retailers (OPRs) within government-regulated digital marketplaces, focusing on India’s Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC). The ONDC initiative, aimed at democratizing e-commerce, presents both challenges and opportunities for large and medium-sized OPRs accustomed to traditionally unregulated environments. Employing a Stackelberg game-theoretic model, the study analyzes three scenarios: (1) neither OPR joins ONDC, (2) only one OPR joins ONDC, and (3) both OPRs join ONDC. Each scenario evaluates key factors—pricing strategies, sales efforts, and supply chain profitability—to determine how regulatory frameworks impact competitive dynamics. The findings reveal a trade-off for OPRs between higher short-term profits when abstaining from ONDC and enhanced long-term value through ONDC participation. Specifically, participation in ONDC can facilitate market sustainability and growth for sellers, underscoring the transformative potential of regulated digital ecosystems. This study provides actionable insights for OPRs contemplating ONDC adoption, highlighting the strategic risks such as potential market share erosion and supply chain inefficiency. For policymakers, it emphasizes the importance of balancing the interests of OPRs and sellers to foster an inclusive, competitive digital marketplace. By examining the strategic adaptations of OPRs within a government-regulated digital marketplace, this study advances the understanding of regulatory impacts on competitive environments and offers a generalizable framework for decision-making in global digital economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100717"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic adaptation for online platform retailers in government-regulated digital marketplaces\",\"authors\":\"Sarat Kumar Jena , Purushottam Meena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the strategic decisions of online platform retailers (OPRs) within government-regulated digital marketplaces, focusing on India’s Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC). The ONDC initiative, aimed at democratizing e-commerce, presents both challenges and opportunities for large and medium-sized OPRs accustomed to traditionally unregulated environments. Employing a Stackelberg game-theoretic model, the study analyzes three scenarios: (1) neither OPR joins ONDC, (2) only one OPR joins ONDC, and (3) both OPRs join ONDC. Each scenario evaluates key factors—pricing strategies, sales efforts, and supply chain profitability—to determine how regulatory frameworks impact competitive dynamics. The findings reveal a trade-off for OPRs between higher short-term profits when abstaining from ONDC and enhanced long-term value through ONDC participation. Specifically, participation in ONDC can facilitate market sustainability and growth for sellers, underscoring the transformative potential of regulated digital ecosystems. This study provides actionable insights for OPRs contemplating ONDC adoption, highlighting the strategic risks such as potential market share erosion and supply chain inefficiency. For policymakers, it emphasizes the importance of balancing the interests of OPRs and sellers to foster an inclusive, competitive digital marketplace. By examining the strategic adaptations of OPRs within a government-regulated digital marketplace, this study advances the understanding of regulatory impacts on competitive environments and offers a generalizable framework for decision-making in global digital economies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000678\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategic adaptation for online platform retailers in government-regulated digital marketplaces
This study investigates the strategic decisions of online platform retailers (OPRs) within government-regulated digital marketplaces, focusing on India’s Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC). The ONDC initiative, aimed at democratizing e-commerce, presents both challenges and opportunities for large and medium-sized OPRs accustomed to traditionally unregulated environments. Employing a Stackelberg game-theoretic model, the study analyzes three scenarios: (1) neither OPR joins ONDC, (2) only one OPR joins ONDC, and (3) both OPRs join ONDC. Each scenario evaluates key factors—pricing strategies, sales efforts, and supply chain profitability—to determine how regulatory frameworks impact competitive dynamics. The findings reveal a trade-off for OPRs between higher short-term profits when abstaining from ONDC and enhanced long-term value through ONDC participation. Specifically, participation in ONDC can facilitate market sustainability and growth for sellers, underscoring the transformative potential of regulated digital ecosystems. This study provides actionable insights for OPRs contemplating ONDC adoption, highlighting the strategic risks such as potential market share erosion and supply chain inefficiency. For policymakers, it emphasizes the importance of balancing the interests of OPRs and sellers to foster an inclusive, competitive digital marketplace. By examining the strategic adaptations of OPRs within a government-regulated digital marketplace, this study advances the understanding of regulatory impacts on competitive environments and offers a generalizable framework for decision-making in global digital economies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.