一项基于人群的队列研究表明,身体恢复能力可以抵消与遗传易感性相关的死亡风险

Lea Stark, Federico Triolo, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Debora Rizzuto, Israel Contador, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Serhiy Dekhtyar
{"title":"一项基于人群的队列研究表明,身体恢复能力可以抵消与遗传易感性相关的死亡风险","authors":"Lea Stark, Federico Triolo, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Debora Rizzuto, Israel Contador, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Serhiy Dekhtyar","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Physical resilience (PR), the ability to recover from health adversities, is thought to buffer health challenges during aging. However, PR’s association with mortality and its ability to offset the negative effects of genetic susceptibility to shorter lifespan remain unknown. Methods Data on 3,041 individuals (age: 60+) from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K) were analyzed. PR was assessed at baseline (2001-2004) using residual gait speed for a given level of chronic diseases, medications, and sociodemographics, categorized as low (residual SD’s ≤ -1), moderate (-1 < SD < 1), or high resilience (SD ≥ 1). A genetic risk score (GRS) was derived from four SNPs linked to longevity (hTERT, APOE, TOMM40, IGF-1R). Cox proportional hazard models and Laplace regression examined 18-year mortality and median survival, respectively. PR was assessed as the moderator of the GRS-mortality association in stratified analysis. Results Compared to individuals with moderate PR, those with low resilience had higher mortality risk (HR: 1.28; 95% CI [1.09, 1.51]), with the opposite pattern in those with high PR (HR: 0.71; 95% CI [0.60, 0.84]). Above-median levels of GRS were associated with increased mortality risk (HR: 1.34; 95% CI [1.18, 1.52]). Stratified by PR, mortality risk associated with higher GRS was elevated among those with low and moderate resilience but not among older adults with high resilience. Conclusion PR appears to partly modify mortality risk associated with genetic predisposition to shorter survival. Fostering PR could benefit personalized therapeutic strategies to support healthy aging.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical resilience may offset mortality risks associated with genetic predisposition to shorter survival: A population-based cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Lea Stark, Federico Triolo, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Debora Rizzuto, Israel Contador, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Serhiy Dekhtyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Physical resilience (PR), the ability to recover from health adversities, is thought to buffer health challenges during aging. However, PR’s association with mortality and its ability to offset the negative effects of genetic susceptibility to shorter lifespan remain unknown. Methods Data on 3,041 individuals (age: 60+) from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K) were analyzed. PR was assessed at baseline (2001-2004) using residual gait speed for a given level of chronic diseases, medications, and sociodemographics, categorized as low (residual SD’s ≤ -1), moderate (-1 < SD < 1), or high resilience (SD ≥ 1). A genetic risk score (GRS) was derived from four SNPs linked to longevity (hTERT, APOE, TOMM40, IGF-1R). Cox proportional hazard models and Laplace regression examined 18-year mortality and median survival, respectively. PR was assessed as the moderator of the GRS-mortality association in stratified analysis. Results Compared to individuals with moderate PR, those with low resilience had higher mortality risk (HR: 1.28; 95% CI [1.09, 1.51]), with the opposite pattern in those with high PR (HR: 0.71; 95% CI [0.60, 0.84]). Above-median levels of GRS were associated with increased mortality risk (HR: 1.34; 95% CI [1.18, 1.52]). Stratified by PR, mortality risk associated with higher GRS was elevated among those with low and moderate resilience but not among older adults with high resilience. Conclusion PR appears to partly modify mortality risk associated with genetic predisposition to shorter survival. Fostering PR could benefit personalized therapeutic strategies to support healthy aging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

身体弹性(PR),从健康逆境中恢复的能力,被认为可以缓冲衰老过程中的健康挑战。然而,PR与死亡率的关系及其抵消遗传易感性对寿命缩短的负面影响的能力仍然未知。方法对瑞典国家Kungsholmen老龄化与护理研究(SNAC-K)中3041名60岁以上个体的数据进行分析。在基线(2001-2004年)使用残差步速对给定慢性疾病、药物和社会人口统计水平的PR进行评估,分为低(残差SD≤-1)、中(-1 <;SD, lt;1),或高弹性(SD≥1)。遗传风险评分(GRS)来自与寿命相关的四个snp (hTERT, APOE, TOMM40, IGF-1R)。Cox比例风险模型和拉普拉斯回归分别检验了18年死亡率和中位生存期。在分层分析中,PR被评估为grs -死亡率关联的调节因子。结果与中度恢复力者相比,低恢复力者的死亡风险更高(HR: 1.28;95% CI[1.09, 1.51]),而高PR组则相反(HR: 0.71;95% ci[0.60, 0.84])。高于中位数的GRS水平与死亡风险增加相关(HR: 1.34;95% ci[1.18, 1.52])。按PR分层,高GRS相关的死亡风险在低和中等适应力的老年人中升高,但在高适应力的老年人中没有升高。结论PR可能在一定程度上改变与遗传易感性相关的死亡风险。促进PR有利于个性化治疗策略,以支持健康老龄化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physical resilience may offset mortality risks associated with genetic predisposition to shorter survival: A population-based cohort study
Background Physical resilience (PR), the ability to recover from health adversities, is thought to buffer health challenges during aging. However, PR’s association with mortality and its ability to offset the negative effects of genetic susceptibility to shorter lifespan remain unknown. Methods Data on 3,041 individuals (age: 60+) from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K) were analyzed. PR was assessed at baseline (2001-2004) using residual gait speed for a given level of chronic diseases, medications, and sociodemographics, categorized as low (residual SD’s ≤ -1), moderate (-1 &lt; SD &lt; 1), or high resilience (SD ≥ 1). A genetic risk score (GRS) was derived from four SNPs linked to longevity (hTERT, APOE, TOMM40, IGF-1R). Cox proportional hazard models and Laplace regression examined 18-year mortality and median survival, respectively. PR was assessed as the moderator of the GRS-mortality association in stratified analysis. Results Compared to individuals with moderate PR, those with low resilience had higher mortality risk (HR: 1.28; 95% CI [1.09, 1.51]), with the opposite pattern in those with high PR (HR: 0.71; 95% CI [0.60, 0.84]). Above-median levels of GRS were associated with increased mortality risk (HR: 1.34; 95% CI [1.18, 1.52]). Stratified by PR, mortality risk associated with higher GRS was elevated among those with low and moderate resilience but not among older adults with high resilience. Conclusion PR appears to partly modify mortality risk associated with genetic predisposition to shorter survival. Fostering PR could benefit personalized therapeutic strategies to support healthy aging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信