{"title":"蒙特卡罗模拟GRB数据以测试洛伦兹不变性违反","authors":"Hanlin Song, Bo-Qiang Ma","doi":"10.1103/physrevd.111.103015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lorentz-invariance violation (LV) at energy scales approaching the Planck regime serves as a critical probe for understanding quantum gravity phenomenology. Astrophysical observations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) present a promising avenue for testing LV-induced spectral lag phenomena; however, interpretations are complicated by degeneracies between LV effects and intrinsic emission delays. This study systematically investigates three competing time delay models: model A (LV delay combined with a constant intrinsic delay), model B (energy-dependent intrinsic delay without LV), and model C (LV delay combined with energy-dependent intrinsic delay). We utilize mock GRB datasets generated under distinct delay mechanisms and employ Bayesian parameter estimation on simulated observations of 10 GRBs. Our findings demonstrate that model C consistently recovers input parameters across all datasets, including those designed to mimic LV-dominated (model A) and intrinsic delay-dominated (model B) scenarios. In contrast, models A and B struggle to reconcile data generated under alternative mechanisms, particularly when confronted with high-energy TeV photons from GRB 190114C and GRB 221009A. Our analysis confirms that the incorporation of energy-dependent intrinsic delays in model C is essential for establishing robust LV constraints, effectively resolving prior ambiguities in the interpretation of multi-GeV and TeV photon emissions. The results validate model C as a generalized framework for future LV searches, yielding a subluminal LV scale of E</a:mi></a:mrow>LV</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub>≃</a:mo>3</a:mn>×</a:mo>10</a:mn></a:mrow>17</a:mn></a:mrow></a:msup></a:mtext></a:mtext>GeV</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math> based on realistic datasets, including 14 Fermi-LAT multi-GeV photons from eight GRBs, a 99.3 GeV photon from GRB 221009A observed by Fermi-LAT, a TeV photon from GRB 190114C detected by MAGIC, and a multi-TeV photon from GRB 221009A recorded by LHAASO. These findings are consistent with earlier constraints derived from Fermi-LAT datasets. This work underscores the necessity for joint modeling of LV and astrophysical emission processes in next-generation LV studies utilizing observatories such as LHAASO and CTA. <jats:supplementary-material> <jats:copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</jats:copyright-statement> <jats:copyright-year>2025</jats:copyright-year> </jats:permissions> </jats:supplementary-material>","PeriodicalId":20167,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review D","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monte Carlo simulation of GRB data to test Lorentz-invariance violation\",\"authors\":\"Hanlin Song, Bo-Qiang Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/physrevd.111.103015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lorentz-invariance violation (LV) at energy scales approaching the Planck regime serves as a critical probe for understanding quantum gravity phenomenology. Astrophysical observations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) present a promising avenue for testing LV-induced spectral lag phenomena; however, interpretations are complicated by degeneracies between LV effects and intrinsic emission delays. This study systematically investigates three competing time delay models: model A (LV delay combined with a constant intrinsic delay), model B (energy-dependent intrinsic delay without LV), and model C (LV delay combined with energy-dependent intrinsic delay). We utilize mock GRB datasets generated under distinct delay mechanisms and employ Bayesian parameter estimation on simulated observations of 10 GRBs. Our findings demonstrate that model C consistently recovers input parameters across all datasets, including those designed to mimic LV-dominated (model A) and intrinsic delay-dominated (model B) scenarios. In contrast, models A and B struggle to reconcile data generated under alternative mechanisms, particularly when confronted with high-energy TeV photons from GRB 190114C and GRB 221009A. Our analysis confirms that the incorporation of energy-dependent intrinsic delays in model C is essential for establishing robust LV constraints, effectively resolving prior ambiguities in the interpretation of multi-GeV and TeV photon emissions. The results validate model C as a generalized framework for future LV searches, yielding a subluminal LV scale of E</a:mi></a:mrow>LV</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub>≃</a:mo>3</a:mn>×</a:mo>10</a:mn></a:mrow>17</a:mn></a:mrow></a:msup></a:mtext></a:mtext>GeV</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math> based on realistic datasets, including 14 Fermi-LAT multi-GeV photons from eight GRBs, a 99.3 GeV photon from GRB 221009A observed by Fermi-LAT, a TeV photon from GRB 190114C detected by MAGIC, and a multi-TeV photon from GRB 221009A recorded by LHAASO. These findings are consistent with earlier constraints derived from Fermi-LAT datasets. This work underscores the necessity for joint modeling of LV and astrophysical emission processes in next-generation LV studies utilizing observatories such as LHAASO and CTA. <jats:supplementary-material> <jats:copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</jats:copyright-statement> <jats:copyright-year>2025</jats:copyright-year> </jats:permissions> </jats:supplementary-material>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review D\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review D\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.103015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review D","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.103015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monte Carlo simulation of GRB data to test Lorentz-invariance violation
Lorentz-invariance violation (LV) at energy scales approaching the Planck regime serves as a critical probe for understanding quantum gravity phenomenology. Astrophysical observations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) present a promising avenue for testing LV-induced spectral lag phenomena; however, interpretations are complicated by degeneracies between LV effects and intrinsic emission delays. This study systematically investigates three competing time delay models: model A (LV delay combined with a constant intrinsic delay), model B (energy-dependent intrinsic delay without LV), and model C (LV delay combined with energy-dependent intrinsic delay). We utilize mock GRB datasets generated under distinct delay mechanisms and employ Bayesian parameter estimation on simulated observations of 10 GRBs. Our findings demonstrate that model C consistently recovers input parameters across all datasets, including those designed to mimic LV-dominated (model A) and intrinsic delay-dominated (model B) scenarios. In contrast, models A and B struggle to reconcile data generated under alternative mechanisms, particularly when confronted with high-energy TeV photons from GRB 190114C and GRB 221009A. Our analysis confirms that the incorporation of energy-dependent intrinsic delays in model C is essential for establishing robust LV constraints, effectively resolving prior ambiguities in the interpretation of multi-GeV and TeV photon emissions. The results validate model C as a generalized framework for future LV searches, yielding a subluminal LV scale of ELV≃3×1017GeV based on realistic datasets, including 14 Fermi-LAT multi-GeV photons from eight GRBs, a 99.3 GeV photon from GRB 221009A observed by Fermi-LAT, a TeV photon from GRB 190114C detected by MAGIC, and a multi-TeV photon from GRB 221009A recorded by LHAASO. These findings are consistent with earlier constraints derived from Fermi-LAT datasets. This work underscores the necessity for joint modeling of LV and astrophysical emission processes in next-generation LV studies utilizing observatories such as LHAASO and CTA. Published by the American Physical Society2025
期刊介绍:
Physical Review D (PRD) is a leading journal in elementary particle physics, field theory, gravitation, and cosmology and is one of the top-cited journals in high-energy physics.
PRD covers experimental and theoretical results in all aspects of particle physics, field theory, gravitation and cosmology, including:
Particle physics experiments,
Electroweak interactions,
Strong interactions,
Lattice field theories, lattice QCD,
Beyond the standard model physics,
Phenomenological aspects of field theory, general methods,
Gravity, cosmology, cosmic rays,
Astrophysics and astroparticle physics,
General relativity,
Formal aspects of field theory, field theory in curved space,
String theory, quantum gravity, gauge/gravity duality.