地塞米松在心脏手术中的作用:一项基于登记的、来自荷兰心脏登记临床结果的真实世界数据分析。

Gijs J van Steenbergen,Ted Reniers,Ashley De Bie Dekker,Irene S Lensen,Peter G Noordzij,Thijs C D Rettig,Thomas van Brakel,Arthur Bouwman,Jules R Olsthoorn,
{"title":"地塞米松在心脏手术中的作用:一项基于登记的、来自荷兰心脏登记临床结果的真实世界数据分析。","authors":"Gijs J van Steenbergen,Ted Reniers,Ashley De Bie Dekker,Irene S Lensen,Peter G Noordzij,Thijs C D Rettig,Thomas van Brakel,Arthur Bouwman,Jules R Olsthoorn,","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIn cardiac surgery, modulating the inflammatory response with prophylactic steroids may reduce morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the association of dexamethasone use with clinical outcomes and its variation in clinical practice in a real-world setting.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective, population-based study evaluated data of elective and urgent to on-pump cardiac surgery patients from the Netherlands Heart Registration between 2013 and 2021. Patients who received perioperative dexamethasone were compared to those who did not. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite of 30-day mortality, in-hospital stroke, and 30-day renal or respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome, a composite of infection-related outcomes, arrhythmias, and length of hospital stay. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for confounders. Clinical practice variation was assessed through a national survey of Dutch cardiac anesthesiologists.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn the study, 54,694 patients were included, with 40,891 patients (74.8%) receiving dexamethasone. After propensity score matching, dexamethasone use was associated with a lower risk of the composite clinical outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.92, P < .001), with a significant reduction in renal failure (OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.47-0.70, P < .001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (B -0.17, 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.02, P = .025). Other individual components of the composite outcome and secondary outcomes did not show a significant association with dexamethasone use. However, in patients >80 years, dexamethasone use was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.01-2.28, P = .044). The observed benefits were consistent across other demographic and clinical subgroups. The survey indicated substantial variability in dexamethasone use across centers and anesthesiologists.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nProphylactic dexamethasone during adult cardiac surgery was associated with reduced composite clinical outcomes, renal failure, and shorter hospital stays, and seemed associated with 30-day mortality in patients >80 years old.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Dexamethasone in Cardiac Surgery: A Registry-Based, Real-World Data Analysis of Clinical Outcomes From the Netherlands Heart Registration.\",\"authors\":\"Gijs J van Steenbergen,Ted Reniers,Ashley De Bie Dekker,Irene S Lensen,Peter G Noordzij,Thijs C D Rettig,Thomas van Brakel,Arthur Bouwman,Jules R Olsthoorn,\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ane.0000000000007541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nIn cardiac surgery, modulating the inflammatory response with prophylactic steroids may reduce morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the association of dexamethasone use with clinical outcomes and its variation in clinical practice in a real-world setting.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis retrospective, population-based study evaluated data of elective and urgent to on-pump cardiac surgery patients from the Netherlands Heart Registration between 2013 and 2021. Patients who received perioperative dexamethasone were compared to those who did not. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite of 30-day mortality, in-hospital stroke, and 30-day renal or respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome, a composite of infection-related outcomes, arrhythmias, and length of hospital stay. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for confounders. Clinical practice variation was assessed through a national survey of Dutch cardiac anesthesiologists.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nIn the study, 54,694 patients were included, with 40,891 patients (74.8%) receiving dexamethasone. After propensity score matching, dexamethasone use was associated with a lower risk of the composite clinical outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.92, P < .001), with a significant reduction in renal failure (OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.47-0.70, P < .001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (B -0.17, 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.02, P = .025). Other individual components of the composite outcome and secondary outcomes did not show a significant association with dexamethasone use. However, in patients >80 years, dexamethasone use was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.01-2.28, P = .044). The observed benefits were consistent across other demographic and clinical subgroups. The survey indicated substantial variability in dexamethasone use across centers and anesthesiologists.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nProphylactic dexamethasone during adult cardiac surgery was associated with reduced composite clinical outcomes, renal failure, and shorter hospital stays, and seemed associated with 30-day mortality in patients >80 years old.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在心脏手术中,用预防性类固醇调节炎症反应可以降低发病率和死亡率。我们的目的是评估地塞米松使用与临床结果的关系及其在现实世界中临床实践中的变化。方法:这项基于人群的回顾性研究评估了2013年至2021年间荷兰心脏登记的选择性和紧急心脏手术患者的数据。将围手术期接受地塞米松治疗的患者与未接受地塞米松治疗的患者进行比较。主要结局是30天死亡率和30天死亡率、住院中风和30天肾脏或呼吸衰竭的综合结果。次要结局包括复合结局的各个组成部分、感染相关结局的复合结局、心律失常和住院时间。采用倾向评分匹配来调整混杂因素。临床实践的变化是通过对荷兰心脏麻醉师的全国调查来评估的。结果共纳入54,694例患者,其中40,891例(74.8%)患者接受地塞米松治疗。倾向评分匹配后,地塞米松使用与复合临床结局风险降低相关(优势比[OR] 0.82, 95%可信区间[CI], 0.72-0.92, P < 0.001),肾功能衰竭显著降低相关(优势比[OR] 0.57, 95% CI, 0.47-0.70, P < 0.001)。住院时间明显缩短(B -0.17, 95% CI, -0.32 ~ -0.02, P = 0.025)。复合结局和次要结局的其他单独组成部分未显示与地塞米松使用有显著关联。然而,在0 ~ 80岁的患者中,地塞米松使用与30天死亡率增加相关(OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.01 ~ 2.28, P = 0.044)。观察到的益处在其他人口统计学和临床亚组中是一致的。调查显示,各中心和麻醉师使用地塞米松的情况存在很大差异。结论:成人心脏手术期间预防性使用地塞米松可降低综合临床结果、肾功能衰竭和缩短住院时间,并可能与80岁至80岁患者的30天死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Dexamethasone in Cardiac Surgery: A Registry-Based, Real-World Data Analysis of Clinical Outcomes From the Netherlands Heart Registration.
BACKGROUND In cardiac surgery, modulating the inflammatory response with prophylactic steroids may reduce morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the association of dexamethasone use with clinical outcomes and its variation in clinical practice in a real-world setting. METHODS This retrospective, population-based study evaluated data of elective and urgent to on-pump cardiac surgery patients from the Netherlands Heart Registration between 2013 and 2021. Patients who received perioperative dexamethasone were compared to those who did not. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite of 30-day mortality, in-hospital stroke, and 30-day renal or respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome, a composite of infection-related outcomes, arrhythmias, and length of hospital stay. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for confounders. Clinical practice variation was assessed through a national survey of Dutch cardiac anesthesiologists. RESULTS In the study, 54,694 patients were included, with 40,891 patients (74.8%) receiving dexamethasone. After propensity score matching, dexamethasone use was associated with a lower risk of the composite clinical outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.92, P < .001), with a significant reduction in renal failure (OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.47-0.70, P < .001). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (B -0.17, 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.02, P = .025). Other individual components of the composite outcome and secondary outcomes did not show a significant association with dexamethasone use. However, in patients >80 years, dexamethasone use was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.01-2.28, P = .044). The observed benefits were consistent across other demographic and clinical subgroups. The survey indicated substantial variability in dexamethasone use across centers and anesthesiologists. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic dexamethasone during adult cardiac surgery was associated with reduced composite clinical outcomes, renal failure, and shorter hospital stays, and seemed associated with 30-day mortality in patients >80 years old.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信