边缘型人格障碍短期与长期精神化治疗(MBT-RCT):一项24个月的随机临床试验随访。

IF 16.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sophie Juul,Janus Christian Jakobsen,Emilie Hestbaek,Caroline Barkholt Kamp,Markus Harboe Olsen,Marie Rishede,Frederik Weischer Frandsen,Sune Bo,Stig Poulsen,Per Sørensen,Anthony Bateman,Sebastian Simonsen
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍短期与长期精神化治疗(MBT-RCT):一项24个月的随机临床试验随访。","authors":"Sophie Juul,Janus Christian Jakobsen,Emilie Hestbaek,Caroline Barkholt Kamp,Markus Harboe Olsen,Marie Rishede,Frederik Weischer Frandsen,Sune Bo,Stig Poulsen,Per Sørensen,Anthony Bateman,Sebastian Simonsen","doi":"10.1159/000544934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe and prevalent psychiatric disorder. Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based intervention for BPD, which is often delivered as a long-term psychotherapy program for BPD. We previously published a randomized clinical trial assessing short-term versus long-term MBT for BPD 16 months after randomization as the primary follow-up time-point. Objectives To assess the long-term (24 months) results of short-term versus long-term MBT for outpatients with BPD. Methods Adult outpatients (≥18 years) with subthreshold or diagnosed BPD were randomly assigned (1:1) to short-term MBT (5 months) or long-term MBT (14 months). The primary outcome was BPD symptoms assessed with the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder. Secondary outcomes were level of functioning (assessed using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale), quality of life (assessed using Short Form Health Survey, SF-36), global functioning (assessed using the Global Assessment of Functionins scale, GAF), and severe self-harm. All outcomes were assessed at 24 months after randomization. Results Between October 4, 2018, and December 3, 2020, we randomly assigned 166 participants to short-term MBT (n=84) or long-term MBT (n=82). After 24 months, regression analyses showed no evidence of a difference when assessing the primary outcome, BPD symptoms (ZAN-BPD MD -0.56; 95% CI -2.67 to 1.54; p = 0.598), level of functioning (WSAS MD -1.42% CI -5.04 to 2.21; p = 0.440), global functioning (GAF MD 2.51 95% CI: -1.65 to 6.67; p = 0.234), or severe self-harm (RR 1.38; 95% CI 0.88 to 2.21; p = 0.149). Regression analyses showed evidence of a beneficial effect of long-term MBT when assessing.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"69 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term versus long-term mentalization-based therapy for borderline personality disorder (MBT-RCT): 24 months follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Juul,Janus Christian Jakobsen,Emilie Hestbaek,Caroline Barkholt Kamp,Markus Harboe Olsen,Marie Rishede,Frederik Weischer Frandsen,Sune Bo,Stig Poulsen,Per Sørensen,Anthony Bateman,Sebastian Simonsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000544934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe and prevalent psychiatric disorder. Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based intervention for BPD, which is often delivered as a long-term psychotherapy program for BPD. We previously published a randomized clinical trial assessing short-term versus long-term MBT for BPD 16 months after randomization as the primary follow-up time-point. Objectives To assess the long-term (24 months) results of short-term versus long-term MBT for outpatients with BPD. Methods Adult outpatients (≥18 years) with subthreshold or diagnosed BPD were randomly assigned (1:1) to short-term MBT (5 months) or long-term MBT (14 months). The primary outcome was BPD symptoms assessed with the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder. Secondary outcomes were level of functioning (assessed using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale), quality of life (assessed using Short Form Health Survey, SF-36), global functioning (assessed using the Global Assessment of Functionins scale, GAF), and severe self-harm. All outcomes were assessed at 24 months after randomization. Results Between October 4, 2018, and December 3, 2020, we randomly assigned 166 participants to short-term MBT (n=84) or long-term MBT (n=82). After 24 months, regression analyses showed no evidence of a difference when assessing the primary outcome, BPD symptoms (ZAN-BPD MD -0.56; 95% CI -2.67 to 1.54; p = 0.598), level of functioning (WSAS MD -1.42% CI -5.04 to 2.21; p = 0.440), global functioning (GAF MD 2.51 95% CI: -1.65 to 6.67; p = 0.234), or severe self-harm (RR 1.38; 95% CI 0.88 to 2.21; p = 0.149). Regression analyses showed evidence of a beneficial effect of long-term MBT when assessing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544934\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种严重而普遍的精神障碍。基于心理的治疗(MBT)是一种基于证据的BPD干预,通常作为BPD的长期心理治疗项目提供。我们之前发表了一项随机临床试验,在随机分组后16个月作为主要随访时间点,评估BPD的短期和长期MBT。目的评估BPD门诊患者短期MBT与长期MBT的长期(24个月)效果。方法将阈下或诊断为BPD的成年门诊患者(≥18岁)按1:1的比例随机分为短期MBT(5个月)和长期MBT(14个月)两组。主要结果是用扎纳里尼边缘型人格障碍评定量表评估BPD症状。次要结果是功能水平(使用工作和社会适应量表评估)、生活质量(使用SF-36简短健康调查评估)、整体功能(使用GAF整体功能评估量表评估)和严重自我伤害。所有结果在随机分组后24个月进行评估。在2018年10月4日至2020年12月3日期间,我们随机分配了166名参与者进行短期MBT (n=84)或长期MBT (n=82)。24个月后,回归分析显示,在评估主要结局BPD症状(ZAN-BPD MD -0.56;95% CI -2.67 ~ 1.54;p = 0.598)、功能水平(WSAS MD -1.42% CI -5.04 ~ 2.21;p = 0.440),整体功能(GAF MD 2.51 95% CI: -1.65至6.67;p = 0.234)或严重自残(RR 1.38;95% CI 0.88 ~ 2.21;P = 0.149)。在评估时,回归分析显示了长期MBT有益效果的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-term versus long-term mentalization-based therapy for borderline personality disorder (MBT-RCT): 24 months follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
Introduction Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe and prevalent psychiatric disorder. Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based intervention for BPD, which is often delivered as a long-term psychotherapy program for BPD. We previously published a randomized clinical trial assessing short-term versus long-term MBT for BPD 16 months after randomization as the primary follow-up time-point. Objectives To assess the long-term (24 months) results of short-term versus long-term MBT for outpatients with BPD. Methods Adult outpatients (≥18 years) with subthreshold or diagnosed BPD were randomly assigned (1:1) to short-term MBT (5 months) or long-term MBT (14 months). The primary outcome was BPD symptoms assessed with the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder. Secondary outcomes were level of functioning (assessed using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale), quality of life (assessed using Short Form Health Survey, SF-36), global functioning (assessed using the Global Assessment of Functionins scale, GAF), and severe self-harm. All outcomes were assessed at 24 months after randomization. Results Between October 4, 2018, and December 3, 2020, we randomly assigned 166 participants to short-term MBT (n=84) or long-term MBT (n=82). After 24 months, regression analyses showed no evidence of a difference when assessing the primary outcome, BPD symptoms (ZAN-BPD MD -0.56; 95% CI -2.67 to 1.54; p = 0.598), level of functioning (WSAS MD -1.42% CI -5.04 to 2.21; p = 0.440), global functioning (GAF MD 2.51 95% CI: -1.65 to 6.67; p = 0.234), or severe self-harm (RR 1.38; 95% CI 0.88 to 2.21; p = 0.149). Regression analyses showed evidence of a beneficial effect of long-term MBT when assessing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信