{"title":"优化咖啡研磨一致性的粒度分布模型","authors":"Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong, Sirirung Wongsakul, Theeradech Mookum","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The particle size distribution (PSD) of ground coffee significantly influences its extraction, flavor, and overall beverage quality. This study aimed to develop, validate, and optimize PSD models for the coffee grinding process. Arabica coffee beans subjected to light, medium, and dark roasting were ground to 12 distinct levels ranging from fine to coarse. The PSDs were examined using laser diffraction. The Rosin–Rammler (RR) model was applied to the data by employing quasi-Newton (QN) and Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) optimization methods. Indicators of uniformity, including the uniformity index <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ (k) $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, coefficient of uniformity (Cu), size span (Span), and coefficient of variation (CV), were computed and subsequently compared across various grinding levels and roasting types. Both the QN and LM methodologies demonstrated an excellent fit to the PSD data, evidenced by high <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values across all grinding levels. The medium grinding level exhibited optimal uniformity, as indicated by the high <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and low Cu, Span, and CV values. Although the medium roast displayed slightly superior uniformity, the Kruskal–Wallis analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in grind consistency across the various roast types. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of PSD modeling for characterizing coffee grind consistency. The results provide insights for optimizing grinding parameters to improve coffee quality, while suggesting that roast type may have a limited influence on grind uniformity compared to grinder settings. The developed models and approaches can inform coffee grinding processes and quality control.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Particle Size Distribution Model for Optimizing Coffee Grind Consistency\",\"authors\":\"Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong, Sirirung Wongsakul, Theeradech Mookum\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfpe.70129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The particle size distribution (PSD) of ground coffee significantly influences its extraction, flavor, and overall beverage quality. This study aimed to develop, validate, and optimize PSD models for the coffee grinding process. Arabica coffee beans subjected to light, medium, and dark roasting were ground to 12 distinct levels ranging from fine to coarse. The PSDs were examined using laser diffraction. The Rosin–Rammler (RR) model was applied to the data by employing quasi-Newton (QN) and Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) optimization methods. Indicators of uniformity, including the uniformity index <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mfenced>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mfenced>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ (k) $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, coefficient of uniformity (Cu), size span (Span), and coefficient of variation (CV), were computed and subsequently compared across various grinding levels and roasting types. Both the QN and LM methodologies demonstrated an excellent fit to the PSD data, evidenced by high <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values across all grinding levels. The medium grinding level exhibited optimal uniformity, as indicated by the high <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and low Cu, Span, and CV values. Although the medium roast displayed slightly superior uniformity, the Kruskal–Wallis analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in grind consistency across the various roast types. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of PSD modeling for characterizing coffee grind consistency. The results provide insights for optimizing grinding parameters to improve coffee quality, while suggesting that roast type may have a limited influence on grind uniformity compared to grinder settings. The developed models and approaches can inform coffee grinding processes and quality control.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Process Engineering\",\"volume\":\"48 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Process Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70129\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
咖啡粉的粒度分布(PSD)对其提取、风味和整体饮料品质有显著影响。本研究旨在开发、验证和优化咖啡研磨过程的PSD模型。经过轻度、中度和深度烘焙的阿拉比卡咖啡豆被磨成12个不同的等级,从细到粗。采用激光衍射对psd进行了检测。采用准牛顿(QN)和Levenberg-Marquardt (LM)优化方法对数据进行了松香-拉姆勒(RR)模型的优化。计算了均匀性指标,包括均匀性指数k $$ (k) $$、均匀性系数(Cu)、尺寸跨度(span)和变异系数(CV),并对不同磨矿水平和焙烧类型的均匀性指标进行了比较。QN和LM方法都与PSD数据非常吻合,所有研磨水平的R2值都很高。中等磨削水平的均匀性最佳,表现为高k $$ k $$和低Cu、Span和CV值。虽然中等烘焙的均匀性略好,但Kruskal-Wallis的分析显示,不同烘焙类型的研磨一致性没有统计学上的显著差异。该研究证明了PSD建模在描述咖啡研磨稠度方面的有效性。该结果为优化研磨参数以提高咖啡质量提供了见解,同时表明与研磨机设置相比,烘焙类型对研磨均匀性的影响可能有限。所开发的模型和方法可以为咖啡研磨工艺和质量控制提供指导。
Particle Size Distribution Model for Optimizing Coffee Grind Consistency
The particle size distribution (PSD) of ground coffee significantly influences its extraction, flavor, and overall beverage quality. This study aimed to develop, validate, and optimize PSD models for the coffee grinding process. Arabica coffee beans subjected to light, medium, and dark roasting were ground to 12 distinct levels ranging from fine to coarse. The PSDs were examined using laser diffraction. The Rosin–Rammler (RR) model was applied to the data by employing quasi-Newton (QN) and Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) optimization methods. Indicators of uniformity, including the uniformity index , coefficient of uniformity (Cu), size span (Span), and coefficient of variation (CV), were computed and subsequently compared across various grinding levels and roasting types. Both the QN and LM methodologies demonstrated an excellent fit to the PSD data, evidenced by high R2 values across all grinding levels. The medium grinding level exhibited optimal uniformity, as indicated by the high and low Cu, Span, and CV values. Although the medium roast displayed slightly superior uniformity, the Kruskal–Wallis analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in grind consistency across the various roast types. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of PSD modeling for characterizing coffee grind consistency. The results provide insights for optimizing grinding parameters to improve coffee quality, while suggesting that roast type may have a limited influence on grind uniformity compared to grinder settings. The developed models and approaches can inform coffee grinding processes and quality control.
期刊介绍:
This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.