土壤碳饱和度:我们到底知道什么?

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Katerina Georgiou, Denis Angers, Ryan E. Champiny, M. Francesca Cotrufo, Matthew E. Craig, Sebastian Doetterl, A. Stuart Grandy, Jocelyn M. Lavallee, Yang Lin, Emanuele Lugato, Christopher Poeplau, Katherine S. Rocci, Steffen A. Schweizer, Johan Six, William R. Wieder
{"title":"土壤碳饱和度:我们到底知道什么?","authors":"Katerina Georgiou,&nbsp;Denis Angers,&nbsp;Ryan E. Champiny,&nbsp;M. Francesca Cotrufo,&nbsp;Matthew E. Craig,&nbsp;Sebastian Doetterl,&nbsp;A. Stuart Grandy,&nbsp;Jocelyn M. Lavallee,&nbsp;Yang Lin,&nbsp;Emanuele Lugato,&nbsp;Christopher Poeplau,&nbsp;Katherine S. Rocci,&nbsp;Steffen A. Schweizer,&nbsp;Johan Six,&nbsp;William R. Wieder","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing soils to increase organic carbon storage presents a potential opportunity to mitigate and adapt to global change challenges, while providing numerous co-benefits and ecosystem services. However, soils differ widely in their potential for carbon sequestration, and knowledge of biophysical limits to carbon accumulation may aid in informing priority regions. Consequently, there is great interest in assessing whether soils exhibit a maximum capacity for storing organic carbon, particularly within organo–mineral associations given the finite nature of reactive minerals in a soil. While the concept of soil carbon saturation has existed for over 25 years, recent studies have argued for and against its importance. Here, we summarize the conceptual understanding of soil carbon saturation at both micro- and macro-scales, define key terminology, and address common concerns and misconceptions. We review methods used to quantify soil carbon saturation, highlighting the theory and potential caveats of each approach. Critically, we explore the utility of the principles of soil carbon saturation for informing carbon accumulation, vulnerability to loss, and representations in process-based models. We highlight key knowledge gaps and propose next steps for furthering our mechanistic understanding of soil carbon saturation and its implications for soil management.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70197","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil Carbon Saturation: What Do We Really Know?\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Georgiou,&nbsp;Denis Angers,&nbsp;Ryan E. Champiny,&nbsp;M. Francesca Cotrufo,&nbsp;Matthew E. Craig,&nbsp;Sebastian Doetterl,&nbsp;A. Stuart Grandy,&nbsp;Jocelyn M. Lavallee,&nbsp;Yang Lin,&nbsp;Emanuele Lugato,&nbsp;Christopher Poeplau,&nbsp;Katherine S. Rocci,&nbsp;Steffen A. Schweizer,&nbsp;Johan Six,&nbsp;William R. Wieder\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.70197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Managing soils to increase organic carbon storage presents a potential opportunity to mitigate and adapt to global change challenges, while providing numerous co-benefits and ecosystem services. However, soils differ widely in their potential for carbon sequestration, and knowledge of biophysical limits to carbon accumulation may aid in informing priority regions. Consequently, there is great interest in assessing whether soils exhibit a maximum capacity for storing organic carbon, particularly within organo–mineral associations given the finite nature of reactive minerals in a soil. While the concept of soil carbon saturation has existed for over 25 years, recent studies have argued for and against its importance. Here, we summarize the conceptual understanding of soil carbon saturation at both micro- and macro-scales, define key terminology, and address common concerns and misconceptions. We review methods used to quantify soil carbon saturation, highlighting the theory and potential caveats of each approach. Critically, we explore the utility of the principles of soil carbon saturation for informing carbon accumulation, vulnerability to loss, and representations in process-based models. We highlight key knowledge gaps and propose next steps for furthering our mechanistic understanding of soil carbon saturation and its implications for soil management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70197\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70197\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70197","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管理土壤以增加有机碳储量为减缓和适应全球变化挑战提供了一个潜在的机会,同时提供了许多共同利益和生态系统服务。然而,土壤的固碳潜力差异很大,了解碳积累的生物物理限制可能有助于为重点地区提供信息。因此,鉴于土壤中活性矿物的有限性,评估土壤是否具有最大的有机碳储存能力,特别是在有机矿物组合中,具有很大的兴趣。虽然土壤碳饱和度的概念已经存在了超过25年,但最近的研究对其重要性进行了争论和反对。在这里,我们总结了微观和宏观尺度上对土壤碳饱和度的概念理解,定义了关键术语,并解决了常见的问题和误解。我们回顾了用于量化土壤碳饱和度的方法,强调了每种方法的理论和潜在的警告。至关重要的是,我们探索了土壤碳饱和度原理的效用,为碳积累、损失脆弱性和基于过程的模型中的表示提供了信息。我们强调了关键的知识差距,并提出了进一步了解土壤碳饱和度及其对土壤管理的影响的下一步措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Soil Carbon Saturation: What Do We Really Know?

Soil Carbon Saturation: What Do We Really Know?

Managing soils to increase organic carbon storage presents a potential opportunity to mitigate and adapt to global change challenges, while providing numerous co-benefits and ecosystem services. However, soils differ widely in their potential for carbon sequestration, and knowledge of biophysical limits to carbon accumulation may aid in informing priority regions. Consequently, there is great interest in assessing whether soils exhibit a maximum capacity for storing organic carbon, particularly within organo–mineral associations given the finite nature of reactive minerals in a soil. While the concept of soil carbon saturation has existed for over 25 years, recent studies have argued for and against its importance. Here, we summarize the conceptual understanding of soil carbon saturation at both micro- and macro-scales, define key terminology, and address common concerns and misconceptions. We review methods used to quantify soil carbon saturation, highlighting the theory and potential caveats of each approach. Critically, we explore the utility of the principles of soil carbon saturation for informing carbon accumulation, vulnerability to loss, and representations in process-based models. We highlight key knowledge gaps and propose next steps for furthering our mechanistic understanding of soil carbon saturation and its implications for soil management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信