沼泽兔作为低地阔叶林野生动物指示物种的有效性

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Thanchira Suriyamongkol, Jessica L. Esposito, Clayton K. Nielsen, John W. Groninger
{"title":"沼泽兔作为低地阔叶林野生动物指示物种的有效性","authors":"Thanchira Suriyamongkol,&nbsp;Jessica L. Esposito,&nbsp;Clayton K. Nielsen,&nbsp;John W. Groninger","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indicator species have been widely used to monitor ecological integrity and guide habitat restoration and management decision making. Although swamp rabbits (<em>Sylvilagus aquaticus</em>) have been identified as a potential indicator species of wildlife habitat quality in bottomland hardwood (BLH) forests, the effectiveness of swamp rabbits as an indicator species has not been tested quantitatively. We hypothesized that if swamp rabbits were a good indicator species, their responses to habitat components should represent responses of other taxa. Using wildlife presence-absence data collected in 2019 in southern Illinois, USA, we used a hierarchical multi-species occupancy framework to assess occupancy by wildlife and a correlation analysis to assess the relationship between species richness and swamp rabbit habitat components. Swamp rabbits preferred areas closer to upland forest, with high canopy closure, dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, and high forest cover. Overall, 47.5 % of herpetofauna and 44.4 % of avifauna responses to habitat components were similar to swamp rabbits. Amphibians used habitat most similar to swamp rabbits, while facultative-wetland avifauna were the least similar. Although swamp rabbits alone did not represent the entire BLH wildlife community, similarities in occupancy trends between swamp rabbits and other taxa suggested that swamp rabbits could be used as an indicator species. Although management for closed canopy cover would benefit the greatest number of species, conserving other swamp rabbit habitat components, including dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, would benefit amphibian, wetland-dependent avifauna, and some neotropical migratory bird species including species of conservation concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113577"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of swamp rabbits as indicator species for wildlife in bottomland hardwood forests\",\"authors\":\"Thanchira Suriyamongkol,&nbsp;Jessica L. Esposito,&nbsp;Clayton K. Nielsen,&nbsp;John W. Groninger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Indicator species have been widely used to monitor ecological integrity and guide habitat restoration and management decision making. Although swamp rabbits (<em>Sylvilagus aquaticus</em>) have been identified as a potential indicator species of wildlife habitat quality in bottomland hardwood (BLH) forests, the effectiveness of swamp rabbits as an indicator species has not been tested quantitatively. We hypothesized that if swamp rabbits were a good indicator species, their responses to habitat components should represent responses of other taxa. Using wildlife presence-absence data collected in 2019 in southern Illinois, USA, we used a hierarchical multi-species occupancy framework to assess occupancy by wildlife and a correlation analysis to assess the relationship between species richness and swamp rabbit habitat components. Swamp rabbits preferred areas closer to upland forest, with high canopy closure, dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, and high forest cover. Overall, 47.5 % of herpetofauna and 44.4 % of avifauna responses to habitat components were similar to swamp rabbits. Amphibians used habitat most similar to swamp rabbits, while facultative-wetland avifauna were the least similar. Although swamp rabbits alone did not represent the entire BLH wildlife community, similarities in occupancy trends between swamp rabbits and other taxa suggested that swamp rabbits could be used as an indicator species. Although management for closed canopy cover would benefit the greatest number of species, conserving other swamp rabbit habitat components, including dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, would benefit amphibian, wetland-dependent avifauna, and some neotropical migratory bird species including species of conservation concern.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

指示物种已被广泛用于监测生态完整性,指导生境恢复和管理决策。虽然沼泽兔(Sylvilagus aquaticus)已被确定为低地阔叶林野生动物栖息地质量的潜在指示物种,但沼泽兔作为指示物种的有效性尚未得到定量测试。我们假设,如果沼泽兔是一个很好的指示物种,它们对栖息地成分的响应应该代表其他分类单元的响应。利用2019年在美国伊利诺伊州南部收集的野生动物存在-缺失数据,我们使用分层多物种占用框架来评估野生动物的占用,并使用相关分析来评估物种丰富度与沼泽兔栖息地组成之间的关系。沼泽兔偏好靠近高地森林的地区,树冠闭合度高,垂直障碍物和草本地面覆盖密集,森林覆盖率高。总体而言,47.5%的爬行动物和44.4%的鸟类对生境成分的响应与沼泽兔相似。两栖动物的栖息地与沼泽兔最相似,而湿地鸟类最不相似。虽然沼泽兔本身并不能代表整个BLH野生动物群落,但沼泽兔与其他类群在占用趋势上的相似性表明,沼泽兔可以作为一个指标物种。虽然对封闭树冠覆盖的管理将使大多数物种受益,但保护其他沼泽兔栖息地的组成部分,包括密集的垂直障碍物和草本地被,将使两栖动物、依赖湿地的鸟类和一些新热带候鸟物种(包括保护物种)受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of swamp rabbits as indicator species for wildlife in bottomland hardwood forests
Indicator species have been widely used to monitor ecological integrity and guide habitat restoration and management decision making. Although swamp rabbits (Sylvilagus aquaticus) have been identified as a potential indicator species of wildlife habitat quality in bottomland hardwood (BLH) forests, the effectiveness of swamp rabbits as an indicator species has not been tested quantitatively. We hypothesized that if swamp rabbits were a good indicator species, their responses to habitat components should represent responses of other taxa. Using wildlife presence-absence data collected in 2019 in southern Illinois, USA, we used a hierarchical multi-species occupancy framework to assess occupancy by wildlife and a correlation analysis to assess the relationship between species richness and swamp rabbit habitat components. Swamp rabbits preferred areas closer to upland forest, with high canopy closure, dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, and high forest cover. Overall, 47.5 % of herpetofauna and 44.4 % of avifauna responses to habitat components were similar to swamp rabbits. Amphibians used habitat most similar to swamp rabbits, while facultative-wetland avifauna were the least similar. Although swamp rabbits alone did not represent the entire BLH wildlife community, similarities in occupancy trends between swamp rabbits and other taxa suggested that swamp rabbits could be used as an indicator species. Although management for closed canopy cover would benefit the greatest number of species, conserving other swamp rabbit habitat components, including dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, would benefit amphibian, wetland-dependent avifauna, and some neotropical migratory bird species including species of conservation concern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信