Thanchira Suriyamongkol, Jessica L. Esposito, Clayton K. Nielsen, John W. Groninger
{"title":"沼泽兔作为低地阔叶林野生动物指示物种的有效性","authors":"Thanchira Suriyamongkol, Jessica L. Esposito, Clayton K. Nielsen, John W. Groninger","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indicator species have been widely used to monitor ecological integrity and guide habitat restoration and management decision making. Although swamp rabbits (<em>Sylvilagus aquaticus</em>) have been identified as a potential indicator species of wildlife habitat quality in bottomland hardwood (BLH) forests, the effectiveness of swamp rabbits as an indicator species has not been tested quantitatively. We hypothesized that if swamp rabbits were a good indicator species, their responses to habitat components should represent responses of other taxa. Using wildlife presence-absence data collected in 2019 in southern Illinois, USA, we used a hierarchical multi-species occupancy framework to assess occupancy by wildlife and a correlation analysis to assess the relationship between species richness and swamp rabbit habitat components. Swamp rabbits preferred areas closer to upland forest, with high canopy closure, dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, and high forest cover. Overall, 47.5 % of herpetofauna and 44.4 % of avifauna responses to habitat components were similar to swamp rabbits. Amphibians used habitat most similar to swamp rabbits, while facultative-wetland avifauna were the least similar. Although swamp rabbits alone did not represent the entire BLH wildlife community, similarities in occupancy trends between swamp rabbits and other taxa suggested that swamp rabbits could be used as an indicator species. Although management for closed canopy cover would benefit the greatest number of species, conserving other swamp rabbit habitat components, including dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, would benefit amphibian, wetland-dependent avifauna, and some neotropical migratory bird species including species of conservation concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113577"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of swamp rabbits as indicator species for wildlife in bottomland hardwood forests\",\"authors\":\"Thanchira Suriyamongkol, Jessica L. Esposito, Clayton K. Nielsen, John W. Groninger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Indicator species have been widely used to monitor ecological integrity and guide habitat restoration and management decision making. Although swamp rabbits (<em>Sylvilagus aquaticus</em>) have been identified as a potential indicator species of wildlife habitat quality in bottomland hardwood (BLH) forests, the effectiveness of swamp rabbits as an indicator species has not been tested quantitatively. We hypothesized that if swamp rabbits were a good indicator species, their responses to habitat components should represent responses of other taxa. Using wildlife presence-absence data collected in 2019 in southern Illinois, USA, we used a hierarchical multi-species occupancy framework to assess occupancy by wildlife and a correlation analysis to assess the relationship between species richness and swamp rabbit habitat components. Swamp rabbits preferred areas closer to upland forest, with high canopy closure, dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, and high forest cover. Overall, 47.5 % of herpetofauna and 44.4 % of avifauna responses to habitat components were similar to swamp rabbits. Amphibians used habitat most similar to swamp rabbits, while facultative-wetland avifauna were the least similar. Although swamp rabbits alone did not represent the entire BLH wildlife community, similarities in occupancy trends between swamp rabbits and other taxa suggested that swamp rabbits could be used as an indicator species. Although management for closed canopy cover would benefit the greatest number of species, conserving other swamp rabbit habitat components, including dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, would benefit amphibian, wetland-dependent avifauna, and some neotropical migratory bird species including species of conservation concern.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of swamp rabbits as indicator species for wildlife in bottomland hardwood forests
Indicator species have been widely used to monitor ecological integrity and guide habitat restoration and management decision making. Although swamp rabbits (Sylvilagus aquaticus) have been identified as a potential indicator species of wildlife habitat quality in bottomland hardwood (BLH) forests, the effectiveness of swamp rabbits as an indicator species has not been tested quantitatively. We hypothesized that if swamp rabbits were a good indicator species, their responses to habitat components should represent responses of other taxa. Using wildlife presence-absence data collected in 2019 in southern Illinois, USA, we used a hierarchical multi-species occupancy framework to assess occupancy by wildlife and a correlation analysis to assess the relationship between species richness and swamp rabbit habitat components. Swamp rabbits preferred areas closer to upland forest, with high canopy closure, dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, and high forest cover. Overall, 47.5 % of herpetofauna and 44.4 % of avifauna responses to habitat components were similar to swamp rabbits. Amphibians used habitat most similar to swamp rabbits, while facultative-wetland avifauna were the least similar. Although swamp rabbits alone did not represent the entire BLH wildlife community, similarities in occupancy trends between swamp rabbits and other taxa suggested that swamp rabbits could be used as an indicator species. Although management for closed canopy cover would benefit the greatest number of species, conserving other swamp rabbit habitat components, including dense vertical obstruction and herbaceous ground cover, would benefit amphibian, wetland-dependent avifauna, and some neotropical migratory bird species including species of conservation concern.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.