能源转型中的区域公平:评估生产力差距和技术选择的作用

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Qingyu Sun , Chuandong Li , Xiaowei Ma
{"title":"能源转型中的区域公平:评估生产力差距和技术选择的作用","authors":"Qingyu Sun ,&nbsp;Chuandong Li ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving a just energy transition requires regional equity. This study proposes that productivity gaps can drive faster transitions in lagging regions and reduce regional imbalances. We analyze energy productivity catch-up in 284 Chinese cities and find that the productivity gap and growth rate correlate positively. Thus, cities with lower productivity levels can experience faster productivity growth than frontier cities. In particular, technology diffusion and productivity catch-up rates are significantly higher after narrowing the scope by geographical distance and energy factor structure. Using a dual-weight spatial econometric model, we show that technology diffusion is not neutral. Spatial diffusion of directed technology and mismatches in the structure of local factor endowments lead to energy misallocation and impede productivity growth. Therefore, we argue that Chinese cities can achieve convergence in energy transition through productivity catch-up. The prerequisite is that lagging cities determine the direction of technological change based on their production factor characteristics and adopt advanced technologies on this basis. The study provides a novel perspective for achieving a just energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 108531"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional equity in the energy transition: Assessing the role of productivity gaps and technology selection\",\"authors\":\"Qingyu Sun ,&nbsp;Chuandong Li ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Achieving a just energy transition requires regional equity. This study proposes that productivity gaps can drive faster transitions in lagging regions and reduce regional imbalances. We analyze energy productivity catch-up in 284 Chinese cities and find that the productivity gap and growth rate correlate positively. Thus, cities with lower productivity levels can experience faster productivity growth than frontier cities. In particular, technology diffusion and productivity catch-up rates are significantly higher after narrowing the scope by geographical distance and energy factor structure. Using a dual-weight spatial econometric model, we show that technology diffusion is not neutral. Spatial diffusion of directed technology and mismatches in the structure of local factor endowments lead to energy misallocation and impede productivity growth. Therefore, we argue that Chinese cities can achieve convergence in energy transition through productivity catch-up. The prerequisite is that lagging cities determine the direction of technological change based on their production factor characteristics and adopt advanced technologies on this basis. The study provides a novel perspective for achieving a just energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832500355X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832500355X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现公正的能源转型需要区域公平。本研究提出,生产力差距可以推动落后地区更快地转型,减少区域不平衡。通过对中国284个城市能源生产率追赶的分析,发现生产率差距与增长率呈正相关。因此,生产率水平较低的城市比前沿城市的生产率增长更快。特别是地域距离和能源要素结构缩小范围后,技术扩散率和生产率追赶率显著提高。利用双权空间计量模型,我们发现技术扩散不是中性的。定向技术的空间扩散和局部要素禀赋结构的错配导致能源错配,阻碍生产率增长。因此,我们认为中国城市可以通过生产率追赶实现能源转型的趋同。其前提是落后城市根据自身生产要素特征确定技术变革方向,并在此基础上采用先进技术。该研究为实现公正的能源转型提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional equity in the energy transition: Assessing the role of productivity gaps and technology selection
Achieving a just energy transition requires regional equity. This study proposes that productivity gaps can drive faster transitions in lagging regions and reduce regional imbalances. We analyze energy productivity catch-up in 284 Chinese cities and find that the productivity gap and growth rate correlate positively. Thus, cities with lower productivity levels can experience faster productivity growth than frontier cities. In particular, technology diffusion and productivity catch-up rates are significantly higher after narrowing the scope by geographical distance and energy factor structure. Using a dual-weight spatial econometric model, we show that technology diffusion is not neutral. Spatial diffusion of directed technology and mismatches in the structure of local factor endowments lead to energy misallocation and impede productivity growth. Therefore, we argue that Chinese cities can achieve convergence in energy transition through productivity catch-up. The prerequisite is that lagging cities determine the direction of technological change based on their production factor characteristics and adopt advanced technologies on this basis. The study provides a novel perspective for achieving a just energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信