直列悬臂圆柱涡激振动

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
M.M.M.D. Hussain , K. Zwijsen , A.H. van Zuijlen
{"title":"直列悬臂圆柱涡激振动","authors":"M.M.M.D. Hussain ,&nbsp;K. Zwijsen ,&nbsp;A.H. van Zuijlen","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The advent of global warming has brought an increased interest in non-conventional sources of energy, one of which is nuclear energy. Threatening the almost year-round functioning of nuclear power plants are Flow-Induced Vibrations (FIV). One mechanism of FIV, Vortex-Induced Vibration (VIV), holds importance in areas of cross-flow in nuclear power plants where lock-in occurs. To make safe-life designs, computational analysis in the domain of Fluid-Structure Interactions (FSI) has been increasing over the past two decades. This article aims to add to the body of knowledge by making predictions for an in-line two-cylinder configuration, set up as part of a benchmark proposed by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), using the commercial code <em>Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (V2020.3.1)</em>.</div><div>The main objective of this study is to test the efficacy of the URANS framework in predicting VIV, which is connected with the objective of the OECD/NEA to propose recommendations for the <em>Best Practice Guidelines</em>. The benchmark was structured in two phases: the open phase where the experimental results were available to the benchmark participants a priori and the blind phase where the experimental results, with cylinders having different natural frequencies than that of the open phase, were released to the benchmark participants only after all computational results were submitted to the OECD/NEA. The open phase was used to test 3 turbulence models, namely ‘K-<span><math><mi>ω</mi></math></span> SST: Quadratic’, ‘K-<span><math><mi>ω</mi></math></span> SST: Quadratic + GRT transition’ and ‘Standard K-<span><math><mi>ϵ</mi></math></span> Low Re: Cubic’ in order to choose the most appropriate model for the blind phase. Key results from this study revealed the ‘Standard K-<span><math><mi>ϵ</mi></math></span> Low Re: Cubic’ model to be the most apt for the benchmark. Furthermore, gaps are also identified in the application of URANS to predict VIV resonance conditions, namely the overprediction of the vortex shedding frequency, adoption of inflow turbulence and the underprediction of high frequency range spectra.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"297 ","pages":"Article 106647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vortex-Induced Vibrations of in-line cantilevered cylinders\",\"authors\":\"M.M.M.D. Hussain ,&nbsp;K. Zwijsen ,&nbsp;A.H. van Zuijlen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The advent of global warming has brought an increased interest in non-conventional sources of energy, one of which is nuclear energy. Threatening the almost year-round functioning of nuclear power plants are Flow-Induced Vibrations (FIV). One mechanism of FIV, Vortex-Induced Vibration (VIV), holds importance in areas of cross-flow in nuclear power plants where lock-in occurs. To make safe-life designs, computational analysis in the domain of Fluid-Structure Interactions (FSI) has been increasing over the past two decades. This article aims to add to the body of knowledge by making predictions for an in-line two-cylinder configuration, set up as part of a benchmark proposed by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), using the commercial code <em>Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (V2020.3.1)</em>.</div><div>The main objective of this study is to test the efficacy of the URANS framework in predicting VIV, which is connected with the objective of the OECD/NEA to propose recommendations for the <em>Best Practice Guidelines</em>. The benchmark was structured in two phases: the open phase where the experimental results were available to the benchmark participants a priori and the blind phase where the experimental results, with cylinders having different natural frequencies than that of the open phase, were released to the benchmark participants only after all computational results were submitted to the OECD/NEA. The open phase was used to test 3 turbulence models, namely ‘K-<span><math><mi>ω</mi></math></span> SST: Quadratic’, ‘K-<span><math><mi>ω</mi></math></span> SST: Quadratic + GRT transition’ and ‘Standard K-<span><math><mi>ϵ</mi></math></span> Low Re: Cubic’ in order to choose the most appropriate model for the blind phase. Key results from this study revealed the ‘Standard K-<span><math><mi>ϵ</mi></math></span> Low Re: Cubic’ model to be the most apt for the benchmark. Furthermore, gaps are also identified in the application of URANS to predict VIV resonance conditions, namely the overprediction of the vortex shedding frequency, adoption of inflow turbulence and the underprediction of high frequency range spectra.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Fluids\",\"volume\":\"297 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793025001070\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793025001070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球变暖的到来增加了人们对非常规能源的兴趣,核能就是其中之一。流动诱发振动(FIV)威胁着核电站几乎全年的运行。涡激振动(VIV)是涡流激振的一种机制,在核电站发生闭锁的交叉流区域具有重要意义。为了进行安全寿命设计,流固耦合(FSI)领域的计算分析在过去二十年中得到了发展。本文旨在通过对直列双缸配置进行预测来增加知识体系,该配置是经济合作与发展组织(OECD)核能机构(NEA)提出的基准的一部分,使用商业代码Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (V2020.3.1)。本研究的主要目的是测试URANS框架在预测VIV方面的功效,这与经合组织/NEA为最佳实践指南提出建议的目标有关。基准的结构分为两个阶段:开放阶段,实验结果先验地提供给基准参与者;盲阶段,实验结果与开放阶段的自然频率不同,只有在所有计算结果提交给OECD/NEA后,实验结果才发布给基准参与者。为了选择最适合盲相的模型,我们利用开放相对“K-ω SST:二次型”、“K-ω SST:二次型+ GRT过渡”和“标准K- ε低Re:三次型”湍流模型进行了测试。这项研究的关键结果表明,“标准K- ε低Re:立方”模型最适合作为基准。此外,还发现了URANS在预测涡激共振条件方面存在的不足,即对涡激脱落频率的过高预测、采用入流湍流以及对高频范围谱的过低预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vortex-Induced Vibrations of in-line cantilevered cylinders
The advent of global warming has brought an increased interest in non-conventional sources of energy, one of which is nuclear energy. Threatening the almost year-round functioning of nuclear power plants are Flow-Induced Vibrations (FIV). One mechanism of FIV, Vortex-Induced Vibration (VIV), holds importance in areas of cross-flow in nuclear power plants where lock-in occurs. To make safe-life designs, computational analysis in the domain of Fluid-Structure Interactions (FSI) has been increasing over the past two decades. This article aims to add to the body of knowledge by making predictions for an in-line two-cylinder configuration, set up as part of a benchmark proposed by the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), using the commercial code Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (V2020.3.1).
The main objective of this study is to test the efficacy of the URANS framework in predicting VIV, which is connected with the objective of the OECD/NEA to propose recommendations for the Best Practice Guidelines. The benchmark was structured in two phases: the open phase where the experimental results were available to the benchmark participants a priori and the blind phase where the experimental results, with cylinders having different natural frequencies than that of the open phase, were released to the benchmark participants only after all computational results were submitted to the OECD/NEA. The open phase was used to test 3 turbulence models, namely ‘K-ω SST: Quadratic’, ‘K-ω SST: Quadratic + GRT transition’ and ‘Standard K-ϵ Low Re: Cubic’ in order to choose the most appropriate model for the blind phase. Key results from this study revealed the ‘Standard K-ϵ Low Re: Cubic’ model to be the most apt for the benchmark. Furthermore, gaps are also identified in the application of URANS to predict VIV resonance conditions, namely the overprediction of the vortex shedding frequency, adoption of inflow turbulence and the underprediction of high frequency range spectra.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信