{"title":"数量还是质量?比较政府危机传播研究中的社交媒体数据抽样策略","authors":"Jingyuan Yu , Emese Domahidi , Khaoula Benmaarouf , Nadine Steinmetz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media platforms are popular data sources for communication research, with X (formerly Twitter) being the most commonly used. However, strategies for high-quality social media data collection that form the cornerstone of rigorous research are rarely discussed or evaluated. In this paper, we use a case study of government crisis communication during Covid-19 in Germany and Italy to compare deductive and inductive sampling strategies on X in two different timeframes. We used different metrics (Jaccard index, precision, and recall) and different comparisons (relevant users and content, top users and terms, and tweeting frequency over time) to analyze which sampling strategy would provide high-quality data for research. Our results revealed that the deductive sampling strategy outperformed the inductive strategy in all the studied cases, this emphasizes the importance of data quality over quick access or the size of the data set. Further implications for comparative and computational research are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 105531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantity or quality? Comparing social media data sampling strategies for government crisis communication research\",\"authors\":\"Jingyuan Yu , Emese Domahidi , Khaoula Benmaarouf , Nadine Steinmetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social media platforms are popular data sources for communication research, with X (formerly Twitter) being the most commonly used. However, strategies for high-quality social media data collection that form the cornerstone of rigorous research are rarely discussed or evaluated. In this paper, we use a case study of government crisis communication during Covid-19 in Germany and Italy to compare deductive and inductive sampling strategies on X in two different timeframes. We used different metrics (Jaccard index, precision, and recall) and different comparisons (relevant users and content, top users and terms, and tweeting frequency over time) to analyze which sampling strategy would provide high-quality data for research. Our results revealed that the deductive sampling strategy outperformed the inductive strategy in all the studied cases, this emphasizes the importance of data quality over quick access or the size of the data set. Further implications for comparative and computational research are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925003553\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925003553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantity or quality? Comparing social media data sampling strategies for government crisis communication research
Social media platforms are popular data sources for communication research, with X (formerly Twitter) being the most commonly used. However, strategies for high-quality social media data collection that form the cornerstone of rigorous research are rarely discussed or evaluated. In this paper, we use a case study of government crisis communication during Covid-19 in Germany and Italy to compare deductive and inductive sampling strategies on X in two different timeframes. We used different metrics (Jaccard index, precision, and recall) and different comparisons (relevant users and content, top users and terms, and tweeting frequency over time) to analyze which sampling strategy would provide high-quality data for research. Our results revealed that the deductive sampling strategy outperformed the inductive strategy in all the studied cases, this emphasizes the importance of data quality over quick access or the size of the data set. Further implications for comparative and computational research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.