数量还是质量?比较政府危机传播研究中的社交媒体数据抽样策略

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jingyuan Yu , Emese Domahidi , Khaoula Benmaarouf , Nadine Steinmetz
{"title":"数量还是质量?比较政府危机传播研究中的社交媒体数据抽样策略","authors":"Jingyuan Yu ,&nbsp;Emese Domahidi ,&nbsp;Khaoula Benmaarouf ,&nbsp;Nadine Steinmetz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media platforms are popular data sources for communication research, with X (formerly Twitter) being the most commonly used. However, strategies for high-quality social media data collection that form the cornerstone of rigorous research are rarely discussed or evaluated. In this paper, we use a case study of government crisis communication during Covid-19 in Germany and Italy to compare deductive and inductive sampling strategies on X in two different timeframes. We used different metrics (Jaccard index, precision, and recall) and different comparisons (relevant users and content, top users and terms, and tweeting frequency over time) to analyze which sampling strategy would provide high-quality data for research. Our results revealed that the deductive sampling strategy outperformed the inductive strategy in all the studied cases, this emphasizes the importance of data quality over quick access or the size of the data set. Further implications for comparative and computational research are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 105531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantity or quality? Comparing social media data sampling strategies for government crisis communication research\",\"authors\":\"Jingyuan Yu ,&nbsp;Emese Domahidi ,&nbsp;Khaoula Benmaarouf ,&nbsp;Nadine Steinmetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social media platforms are popular data sources for communication research, with X (formerly Twitter) being the most commonly used. However, strategies for high-quality social media data collection that form the cornerstone of rigorous research are rarely discussed or evaluated. In this paper, we use a case study of government crisis communication during Covid-19 in Germany and Italy to compare deductive and inductive sampling strategies on X in two different timeframes. We used different metrics (Jaccard index, precision, and recall) and different comparisons (relevant users and content, top users and terms, and tweeting frequency over time) to analyze which sampling strategy would provide high-quality data for research. Our results revealed that the deductive sampling strategy outperformed the inductive strategy in all the studied cases, this emphasizes the importance of data quality over quick access or the size of the data set. Further implications for comparative and computational research are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925003553\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925003553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体平台是传播研究的热门数据源,其中X(以前的Twitter)是最常用的。然而,作为严谨研究基石的高质量社交媒体数据收集策略却很少被讨论或评估。在本文中,我们以德国和意大利在Covid-19期间的政府危机沟通为例,比较了两个不同时间框架下X的演绎和归纳抽样策略。我们使用不同的指标(Jaccard指数、精度和召回率)和不同的比较(相关用户和内容、顶级用户和术语以及随时间的推文频率)来分析哪种抽样策略可以为研究提供高质量的数据。我们的研究结果表明,演绎抽样策略在所有研究案例中都优于归纳策略,这强调了数据质量比快速访问或数据集大小的重要性。对比较和计算研究的进一步影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantity or quality? Comparing social media data sampling strategies for government crisis communication research
Social media platforms are popular data sources for communication research, with X (formerly Twitter) being the most commonly used. However, strategies for high-quality social media data collection that form the cornerstone of rigorous research are rarely discussed or evaluated. In this paper, we use a case study of government crisis communication during Covid-19 in Germany and Italy to compare deductive and inductive sampling strategies on X in two different timeframes. We used different metrics (Jaccard index, precision, and recall) and different comparisons (relevant users and content, top users and terms, and tweeting frequency over time) to analyze which sampling strategy would provide high-quality data for research. Our results revealed that the deductive sampling strategy outperformed the inductive strategy in all the studied cases, this emphasizes the importance of data quality over quick access or the size of the data set. Further implications for comparative and computational research are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信