捕获上下文:挪威垃圾焚烧中碳捕获和储存的社会技术可行性评估

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Teis Hansen , Bård Torvetjønn Haugland , Markus Steen , Nils Oskar Tronrud
{"title":"捕获上下文:挪威垃圾焚烧中碳捕获和储存的社会技术可行性评估","authors":"Teis Hansen ,&nbsp;Bård Torvetjønn Haugland ,&nbsp;Markus Steen ,&nbsp;Nils Oskar Tronrud","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is central to decarbonisation of the waste-to-energy industry. We complement existing lifecycle assessments and techno-economic analyses of CCS in waste-to-energy with a socio-technical perspective that emphasises interrelations between technologies, practices, institutions, and infrastructures in supporting (or not) development and diffusion of novel solutions such as CCS. More specifically, we assess the feasibility of CCS implementation in waste-to-energy through examining four Norwegian cases with regards to both general (national-sectoral) and local conditions. The feasibility assessment addresses four key dimensions: maturity of technology, developing CCS infrastructure and integration with existing systems, political feasibility, and social acceptance. Drawing on insights from the geography of sustainability transitions literature, we analyse these dimensions considering both general-sectoral and local conditions. Our findings reveal that the feasibility of CCS implementation is influenced by a variety of factors that are shared across the waste-to-energy industry in Norway, as well as highly localised factors at the plant or municipal level. These factors imply that there are limits to opportunities for direct implementation of newly commercialised technologies in other waste-to-energy contexts. From a policy perspective, the importance of such localised factors suggests that investment support for CCS in waste-to-energy should not be reserved exclusively for pioneer plants, and that different policy instruments may be needed for different plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104118"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capturing context: A sociotechnical feasibility assessment of carbon capture and storage in Norwegian waste incineration\",\"authors\":\"Teis Hansen ,&nbsp;Bård Torvetjønn Haugland ,&nbsp;Markus Steen ,&nbsp;Nils Oskar Tronrud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is central to decarbonisation of the waste-to-energy industry. We complement existing lifecycle assessments and techno-economic analyses of CCS in waste-to-energy with a socio-technical perspective that emphasises interrelations between technologies, practices, institutions, and infrastructures in supporting (or not) development and diffusion of novel solutions such as CCS. More specifically, we assess the feasibility of CCS implementation in waste-to-energy through examining four Norwegian cases with regards to both general (national-sectoral) and local conditions. The feasibility assessment addresses four key dimensions: maturity of technology, developing CCS infrastructure and integration with existing systems, political feasibility, and social acceptance. Drawing on insights from the geography of sustainability transitions literature, we analyse these dimensions considering both general-sectoral and local conditions. Our findings reveal that the feasibility of CCS implementation is influenced by a variety of factors that are shared across the waste-to-energy industry in Norway, as well as highly localised factors at the plant or municipal level. These factors imply that there are limits to opportunities for direct implementation of newly commercialised technologies in other waste-to-energy contexts. From a policy perspective, the importance of such localised factors suggests that investment support for CCS in waste-to-energy should not be reserved exclusively for pioneer plants, and that different policy instruments may be needed for different plants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001999\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳捕获和储存(CCS)是废物发电行业脱碳的核心。我们补充现有的生命周期评估和技术经济分析,从社会技术角度强调技术、实践、机构和基础设施之间的相互关系,以支持(或不支持)CCS等新解决方案的开发和推广。更具体地说,我们通过研究挪威的四个案例,从总体(国家-部门)和当地的情况来评估在废物转化为能源方面实施CCS的可行性。可行性评估涉及四个关键方面:技术成熟度、开发CCS基础设施和与现有系统的集成、政治可行性和社会接受度。借鉴可持续性转型文献地理学的见解,我们考虑到一般部门和当地条件来分析这些维度。我们的研究结果表明,CCS实施的可行性受到挪威废物转化为能源行业共享的各种因素的影响,以及工厂或市政层面的高度本地化因素。这些因素意味着,在其他废物转化为能源的情况下,直接实施新商业化技术的机会有限。从政策的角度来看,这些本地化因素的重要性表明,对废物转化为能源的CCS的投资支持不应该只保留给先锋工厂,不同的工厂可能需要不同的政策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capturing context: A sociotechnical feasibility assessment of carbon capture and storage in Norwegian waste incineration
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is central to decarbonisation of the waste-to-energy industry. We complement existing lifecycle assessments and techno-economic analyses of CCS in waste-to-energy with a socio-technical perspective that emphasises interrelations between technologies, practices, institutions, and infrastructures in supporting (or not) development and diffusion of novel solutions such as CCS. More specifically, we assess the feasibility of CCS implementation in waste-to-energy through examining four Norwegian cases with regards to both general (national-sectoral) and local conditions. The feasibility assessment addresses four key dimensions: maturity of technology, developing CCS infrastructure and integration with existing systems, political feasibility, and social acceptance. Drawing on insights from the geography of sustainability transitions literature, we analyse these dimensions considering both general-sectoral and local conditions. Our findings reveal that the feasibility of CCS implementation is influenced by a variety of factors that are shared across the waste-to-energy industry in Norway, as well as highly localised factors at the plant or municipal level. These factors imply that there are limits to opportunities for direct implementation of newly commercialised technologies in other waste-to-energy contexts. From a policy perspective, the importance of such localised factors suggests that investment support for CCS in waste-to-energy should not be reserved exclusively for pioneer plants, and that different policy instruments may be needed for different plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信