Xiao-Xue Jiang , Lai-Wei Li , Xing-Ping Zhang , Ke-Pu Huang , Wen-Jie Ma , Li-Ping Tang , Kou Wang
{"title":"中华芽孢杆菌的化学成分及其化学分类意义","authors":"Xiao-Xue Jiang , Lai-Wei Li , Xing-Ping Zhang , Ke-Pu Huang , Wen-Jie Ma , Li-Ping Tang , Kou Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Twenty-three compounds were isolated from the fruiting body of <em>Engleromyces sinensis</em>, including three ergosterols (<strong>1</strong>–<strong>3</strong>), five phenolic derivatives (<strong>4</strong>–<strong>8</strong>), five alkaloids (<strong>9</strong>–<strong>13</strong>), one lactone (<strong>14</strong>), and nine aliphatic derivatives (<strong>15</strong>–<strong>23</strong>). The structures of all compounds were identified using NMR spectroscopy by comparison with previously reported data. Except for compounds <strong>4</strong>, <strong>5</strong>, <strong>7</strong>, and <strong>9</strong>, all other compounds were isolated from the family Xylariaceae for the first time. Compounds <strong>1</strong>, <strong>9</strong>, <strong>10</strong>, <strong>16</strong>, <strong>18</strong>, <strong>19</strong>, <strong>20</strong>, and <strong>22</strong> exhibited inhibitory effects on <em>α</em>-glucosidase <em>in vitro</em>, with <strong>18</strong> showing the most significant inhibitory efficacy (IC<sub>50</sub> = 1.58 ± 0.05 <em>μ</em>M). Molecular docking was performed on <strong>18</strong> to analyze potential binding sites. Additionally, the chemotaxonomic significance of these compounds was discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 105036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical constituents of Engleromyces sinensis and their chemotaxonomic significance\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Xue Jiang , Lai-Wei Li , Xing-Ping Zhang , Ke-Pu Huang , Wen-Jie Ma , Li-Ping Tang , Kou Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Twenty-three compounds were isolated from the fruiting body of <em>Engleromyces sinensis</em>, including three ergosterols (<strong>1</strong>–<strong>3</strong>), five phenolic derivatives (<strong>4</strong>–<strong>8</strong>), five alkaloids (<strong>9</strong>–<strong>13</strong>), one lactone (<strong>14</strong>), and nine aliphatic derivatives (<strong>15</strong>–<strong>23</strong>). The structures of all compounds were identified using NMR spectroscopy by comparison with previously reported data. Except for compounds <strong>4</strong>, <strong>5</strong>, <strong>7</strong>, and <strong>9</strong>, all other compounds were isolated from the family Xylariaceae for the first time. Compounds <strong>1</strong>, <strong>9</strong>, <strong>10</strong>, <strong>16</strong>, <strong>18</strong>, <strong>19</strong>, <strong>20</strong>, and <strong>22</strong> exhibited inhibitory effects on <em>α</em>-glucosidase <em>in vitro</em>, with <strong>18</strong> showing the most significant inhibitory efficacy (IC<sub>50</sub> = 1.58 ± 0.05 <em>μ</em>M). Molecular docking was performed on <strong>18</strong> to analyze potential binding sites. Additionally, the chemotaxonomic significance of these compounds was discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000857\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chemical constituents of Engleromyces sinensis and their chemotaxonomic significance
Twenty-three compounds were isolated from the fruiting body of Engleromyces sinensis, including three ergosterols (1–3), five phenolic derivatives (4–8), five alkaloids (9–13), one lactone (14), and nine aliphatic derivatives (15–23). The structures of all compounds were identified using NMR spectroscopy by comparison with previously reported data. Except for compounds 4, 5, 7, and 9, all other compounds were isolated from the family Xylariaceae for the first time. Compounds 1, 9, 10, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 22 exhibited inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase in vitro, with 18 showing the most significant inhibitory efficacy (IC50 = 1.58 ± 0.05 μM). Molecular docking was performed on 18 to analyze potential binding sites. Additionally, the chemotaxonomic significance of these compounds was discussed.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.