辅助放射治疗乳腺癌:2种低分馏方案的毒性比较分析

IF 0.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Laura Vaya González, Clara Iglesias Melero, María Soledad Quesada Muñoz, María Domínguez Rodríguez, José Manuel Rico Pérez, Nuria Azahara Linares Mesa
{"title":"辅助放射治疗乳腺癌:2种低分馏方案的毒性比较分析","authors":"Laura Vaya González,&nbsp;Clara Iglesias Melero,&nbsp;María Soledad Quesada Muñoz,&nbsp;María Domínguez Rodríguez,&nbsp;José Manuel Rico Pérez,&nbsp;Nuria Azahara Linares Mesa","doi":"10.1016/j.senol.2025.100697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer has been given in 1.8–2 Gy daily fractions for decades. Protracted schemes have proven as effective and safe as conventional. Schemes involving 5 fractions once a week are as safe as those involving one daily fraction for three weeks. We compared acute and late toxicity of two hypofractionated regimes.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Retrospective single-center observational study involving 100 unselected patients, treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer with either 40 Gy/15 fr/3 weeks or 28,5 Gy/5 fr/5 weeks (1:1 ratio). Statistical tests used: Mann–Whitney U and Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>). Toxicity (assessed by physicians/nurses using RTOG/CTCAE Score at end of treatment, one month and six months later) was retrieved from patients notes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median follow-up: 16.6 months. Average age: 59 years. The comparison between the 15-session and 5-session groups revealed the following results: boost: 24% vs. 2%; lumpectomy: 62% vs. 92%; mastectomy 38% vs. 14%; lymphadenectomy 36% vs. 14%; RT to SCF + level III: 54% vs. 8%; acute skin toxicity 70% vs. 60%; acute odynophagia: 16% vs. 2%; late toxicity (induration, edema, deformity-distortion, telangiectasias, hyperpigmentation) 30% vs. 52%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Odynophagia was more frequent in weekly treatments. Prophylactic nodal irradiation rates could be a confounding factor. A modest excess of G1 breast induration in 5 fractions schemes was detected. To summarize, both schemes are similar concerning acute and late toxicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38058,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 100697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de mama: análisis comparativo de la toxicidad de 2 esquemas de hipofraccionamiento\",\"authors\":\"Laura Vaya González,&nbsp;Clara Iglesias Melero,&nbsp;María Soledad Quesada Muñoz,&nbsp;María Domínguez Rodríguez,&nbsp;José Manuel Rico Pérez,&nbsp;Nuria Azahara Linares Mesa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.senol.2025.100697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer has been given in 1.8–2 Gy daily fractions for decades. Protracted schemes have proven as effective and safe as conventional. Schemes involving 5 fractions once a week are as safe as those involving one daily fraction for three weeks. We compared acute and late toxicity of two hypofractionated regimes.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Retrospective single-center observational study involving 100 unselected patients, treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer with either 40 Gy/15 fr/3 weeks or 28,5 Gy/5 fr/5 weeks (1:1 ratio). Statistical tests used: Mann–Whitney U and Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>). Toxicity (assessed by physicians/nurses using RTOG/CTCAE Score at end of treatment, one month and six months later) was retrieved from patients notes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median follow-up: 16.6 months. Average age: 59 years. The comparison between the 15-session and 5-session groups revealed the following results: boost: 24% vs. 2%; lumpectomy: 62% vs. 92%; mastectomy 38% vs. 14%; lymphadenectomy 36% vs. 14%; RT to SCF + level III: 54% vs. 8%; acute skin toxicity 70% vs. 60%; acute odynophagia: 16% vs. 2%; late toxicity (induration, edema, deformity-distortion, telangiectasias, hyperpigmentation) 30% vs. 52%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Odynophagia was more frequent in weekly treatments. Prophylactic nodal irradiation rates could be a confounding factor. A modest excess of G1 breast induration in 5 fractions schemes was detected. To summarize, both schemes are similar concerning acute and late toxicity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158225000337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158225000337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的数十年来,乳腺癌辅助放疗(RT)的每日剂量为1.8-2 Gy。长期计划已被证明与传统计划一样有效和安全。每周5次的方案与连续三周每天1次的方案一样安全。我们比较了两种低分割方案的急性和晚期毒性。材料和方法回顾性单中心观察研究,纳入100例未选择的乳腺癌患者,接受辅助放疗,40 Gy/15 fr/3 周或28.5 Gy/5 fr/5 周(1:1比例)。统计检验:Mann-Whitney U和χ2 (χ2)。毒性(由医生/护士在治疗结束、1个月和6个月后使用RTOG/CTCAE评分评估)从患者记录中检索。中位随访时间:16.6 个月。平均年龄59岁 岁。15节课组和5节课组的对比结果如下:提升幅度分别为24%和2%;乳房肿瘤切除术:62% vs. 92%;乳房切除术38% vs. 14%;淋巴结切除术36% vs. 14%;RT至SCF + III级:54% vs. 8%;急性皮肤毒性70% vs 60%;急性缺血症:16% vs. 2%;晚期毒性(硬化、水肿、畸形-扭曲、毛细血管扩张、色素沉着)30% vs 52%。结论每周治疗中出现较多的厌食症。预防性淋巴结照射率可能是一个混杂因素。在5个分数方案中检测到G1乳房硬化的适度过量。总之,两种方案在急性和晚期毒性方面是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de mama: análisis comparativo de la toxicidad de 2 esquemas de hipofraccionamiento

Objective

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer has been given in 1.8–2 Gy daily fractions for decades. Protracted schemes have proven as effective and safe as conventional. Schemes involving 5 fractions once a week are as safe as those involving one daily fraction for three weeks. We compared acute and late toxicity of two hypofractionated regimes.

Material and methods

Retrospective single-center observational study involving 100 unselected patients, treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer with either 40 Gy/15 fr/3 weeks or 28,5 Gy/5 fr/5 weeks (1:1 ratio). Statistical tests used: Mann–Whitney U and Chi-square (χ2). Toxicity (assessed by physicians/nurses using RTOG/CTCAE Score at end of treatment, one month and six months later) was retrieved from patients notes.

Results

Median follow-up: 16.6 months. Average age: 59 years. The comparison between the 15-session and 5-session groups revealed the following results: boost: 24% vs. 2%; lumpectomy: 62% vs. 92%; mastectomy 38% vs. 14%; lymphadenectomy 36% vs. 14%; RT to SCF + level III: 54% vs. 8%; acute skin toxicity 70% vs. 60%; acute odynophagia: 16% vs. 2%; late toxicity (induration, edema, deformity-distortion, telangiectasias, hyperpigmentation) 30% vs. 52%.

Conclusion

Odynophagia was more frequent in weekly treatments. Prophylactic nodal irradiation rates could be a confounding factor. A modest excess of G1 breast induration in 5 fractions schemes was detected. To summarize, both schemes are similar concerning acute and late toxicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
63 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信