Hui Yao , Meritxell Romans-Casas , Igor Vassilev , Johanna M. Rinta-Kanto , Sebastià Puig , Antti J. Rissanen , Marika Kokko
{"title":"微生物电合成CO2和甲醇选择性丁酸盐——pH的影响","authors":"Hui Yao , Meritxell Romans-Casas , Igor Vassilev , Johanna M. Rinta-Kanto , Sebastià Puig , Antti J. Rissanen , Marika Kokko","doi":"10.1016/j.bioelechem.2025.109000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methanol assisted microbial electrosynthesis (MES) enables butyrate production from carbon dioxide and methanol using external electricity. However, the effects of operational parameters on butyrate formation remain unclear. By running three flat plate MES reactors with fed-batch mode at three controlled pH values (5.5, 6 and 7), the present study investigated the influence of pH on methanol assisted MES by comparing the process performance, microbial community structure, and genetic potential. The highest butyrate selectivity (87 % on carbon basis) and the highest butyrate production rate of 0.3 g L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> were obtained at pH 6. At pH 7, a comparable butyrate production rate was achieved, yet with a lower selectivity (70 %) accompanied with acetate production. Butyrate production rate was considerably hindered at pH 5.5, reaching 0.1 g L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, while the selectivity reached was up to 81 %. Methanol and CO<sub>2</sub> consumption increased with pH, along with more negative cathodic potential and more negative redox potential. Furthermore, pH affected the thermodynamical feasibility of involved reactions. The results of metagenomic analyses suggest that <em>Eubacterium callanderi</em> dominated the microbial communities at all pH values, which was responsible for methanol and CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway and was likely the main butyrate producer via the reverse β-oxidation pathway.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":252,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectrochemistry","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 109000"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective butyrate production from CO2 and methanol in microbial electrosynthesis - influence of pH\",\"authors\":\"Hui Yao , Meritxell Romans-Casas , Igor Vassilev , Johanna M. Rinta-Kanto , Sebastià Puig , Antti J. Rissanen , Marika Kokko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioelechem.2025.109000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Methanol assisted microbial electrosynthesis (MES) enables butyrate production from carbon dioxide and methanol using external electricity. However, the effects of operational parameters on butyrate formation remain unclear. By running three flat plate MES reactors with fed-batch mode at three controlled pH values (5.5, 6 and 7), the present study investigated the influence of pH on methanol assisted MES by comparing the process performance, microbial community structure, and genetic potential. The highest butyrate selectivity (87 % on carbon basis) and the highest butyrate production rate of 0.3 g L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> were obtained at pH 6. At pH 7, a comparable butyrate production rate was achieved, yet with a lower selectivity (70 %) accompanied with acetate production. Butyrate production rate was considerably hindered at pH 5.5, reaching 0.1 g L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>, while the selectivity reached was up to 81 %. Methanol and CO<sub>2</sub> consumption increased with pH, along with more negative cathodic potential and more negative redox potential. Furthermore, pH affected the thermodynamical feasibility of involved reactions. The results of metagenomic analyses suggest that <em>Eubacterium callanderi</em> dominated the microbial communities at all pH values, which was responsible for methanol and CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway and was likely the main butyrate producer via the reverse β-oxidation pathway.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectrochemistry\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectrochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567539425001033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567539425001033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
甲醇辅助微生物电合成(MES)使利用外部电力从二氧化碳和甲醇生产丁酸盐成为可能。然而,操作参数对丁酸盐形成的影响尚不清楚。本研究通过在三个控制pH值(5.5、6和7)下运行三个进料批量模式的平板MES反应器,通过比较pH值对甲醇辅助MES的工艺性能、微生物群落结构和遗传潜力的影响,研究了pH对甲醇辅助MES的影响。在pH为6的条件下,丁酸盐的选择性最高(87%),丁酸盐的产率最高(0.3 g L−1 d−1)。在pH为7的条件下,丁酸酯的产率与乙酸酯的产率相当,但选择性较低(70%)。pH为5.5时,丁酸酯的产率受到较大阻碍,为0.1 g L−1 d−1,而选择性达到81%。甲醇和CO2消耗量随pH值的增加而增加,负阴极电位和负氧化还原电位也随之增加。此外,pH值还影响了相关反应的热力学可行性。宏基因组分析结果表明,callanderi真杆菌在所有pH值下都占主导地位,它负责通过Wood-Ljungdahl途径同化甲醇和CO2,并且可能是通过反向β氧化途径产生丁酸盐的主要微生物。
Selective butyrate production from CO2 and methanol in microbial electrosynthesis - influence of pH
Methanol assisted microbial electrosynthesis (MES) enables butyrate production from carbon dioxide and methanol using external electricity. However, the effects of operational parameters on butyrate formation remain unclear. By running three flat plate MES reactors with fed-batch mode at three controlled pH values (5.5, 6 and 7), the present study investigated the influence of pH on methanol assisted MES by comparing the process performance, microbial community structure, and genetic potential. The highest butyrate selectivity (87 % on carbon basis) and the highest butyrate production rate of 0.3 g L−1 d−1 were obtained at pH 6. At pH 7, a comparable butyrate production rate was achieved, yet with a lower selectivity (70 %) accompanied with acetate production. Butyrate production rate was considerably hindered at pH 5.5, reaching 0.1 g L−1 d−1, while the selectivity reached was up to 81 %. Methanol and CO2 consumption increased with pH, along with more negative cathodic potential and more negative redox potential. Furthermore, pH affected the thermodynamical feasibility of involved reactions. The results of metagenomic analyses suggest that Eubacterium callanderi dominated the microbial communities at all pH values, which was responsible for methanol and CO2 assimilation via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway and was likely the main butyrate producer via the reverse β-oxidation pathway.
期刊介绍:
An International Journal Devoted to Electrochemical Aspects of Biology and Biological Aspects of Electrochemistry
Bioelectrochemistry is an international journal devoted to electrochemical principles in biology and biological aspects of electrochemistry. It publishes experimental and theoretical papers dealing with the electrochemical aspects of:
• Electrified interfaces (electric double layers, adsorption, electron transfer, protein electrochemistry, basic principles of biosensors, biosensor interfaces and bio-nanosensor design and construction.
• Electric and magnetic field effects (field-dependent processes, field interactions with molecules, intramolecular field effects, sensory systems for electric and magnetic fields, molecular and cellular mechanisms)
• Bioenergetics and signal transduction (energy conversion, photosynthetic and visual membranes)
• Biomembranes and model membranes (thermodynamics and mechanics, membrane transport, electroporation, fusion and insertion)
• Electrochemical applications in medicine and biotechnology (drug delivery and gene transfer to cells and tissues, iontophoresis, skin electroporation, injury and repair).
• Organization and use of arrays in-vitro and in-vivo, including as part of feedback control.
• Electrochemical interrogation of biofilms as generated by microorganisms and tissue reaction associated with medical implants.