Sung-Jae Kim , Hee-Chun Chung , Soo-Yeon Park , Jae-Myun Lee , Jeong-Hee Han
{"title":"益生菌对健康犬抗生素治疗引起的肠道菌群失调的有益作用","authors":"Sung-Jae Kim , Hee-Chun Chung , Soo-Yeon Park , Jae-Myun Lee , Jeong-Hee Han","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining host health. While numerous studies have explored the impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiota in humans, limited research has examined how antibiotics affect the gut microbiome in dogs. This study investigated the effects of antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiota of dogs and assessed whether probiotic supplementation could prevent antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Fourteen healthy young dogs undergoing castration were included in the study. All dogs received a single injection of cefovecin immediately after surgery. The probiotics group (7 dogs) was given a probiotic complex daily starting on the day of surgery and continuing for two weeks, while the non-probiotics group (7 dogs) received no supplementation. Fecal samples were collected on the day of surgery and two weeks later during the follow-up visit for suture removal for microbiome analysis. In microbial diversity analysis, α-diversity was significantly higher in the probiotic-supplemented group compared to the non-probiotics group (<em>p</em> < 0.05). β-diversity analysis revealed significant differences in microbial community composition in the non-probiotics group after antibiotic treatment (<em>p</em> < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the probiotics group. Relative abundance analysis indicated that <em>Clostridioides</em>, a marker of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, significantly increased in dogs without probiotics after antibiotic treatment (<em>p</em> < 0.05). In contrast, <em>Butyricicoccus</em>, a butyrate-producing bacterium with gut health benefits, was significantly enriched in the probiotics group (<em>p</em> < 0.05). These findings suggest that probiotic supplementation supports healthier gut microbiome recovery following antibiotic treatment and highlights its potential to enhance gut microbiota restoration and mitigate gut dysbiosis caused by antibiotics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 105674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beneficial effects of probiotics on dysbiosis of gut microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment in healthy dogs\",\"authors\":\"Sung-Jae Kim , Hee-Chun Chung , Soo-Yeon Park , Jae-Myun Lee , Jeong-Hee Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining host health. While numerous studies have explored the impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiota in humans, limited research has examined how antibiotics affect the gut microbiome in dogs. This study investigated the effects of antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiota of dogs and assessed whether probiotic supplementation could prevent antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Fourteen healthy young dogs undergoing castration were included in the study. All dogs received a single injection of cefovecin immediately after surgery. The probiotics group (7 dogs) was given a probiotic complex daily starting on the day of surgery and continuing for two weeks, while the non-probiotics group (7 dogs) received no supplementation. Fecal samples were collected on the day of surgery and two weeks later during the follow-up visit for suture removal for microbiome analysis. In microbial diversity analysis, α-diversity was significantly higher in the probiotic-supplemented group compared to the non-probiotics group (<em>p</em> < 0.05). β-diversity analysis revealed significant differences in microbial community composition in the non-probiotics group after antibiotic treatment (<em>p</em> < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the probiotics group. Relative abundance analysis indicated that <em>Clostridioides</em>, a marker of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, significantly increased in dogs without probiotics after antibiotic treatment (<em>p</em> < 0.05). In contrast, <em>Butyricicoccus</em>, a butyrate-producing bacterium with gut health benefits, was significantly enriched in the probiotics group (<em>p</em> < 0.05). These findings suggest that probiotic supplementation supports healthier gut microbiome recovery following antibiotic treatment and highlights its potential to enhance gut microbiota restoration and mitigate gut dysbiosis caused by antibiotics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001481\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beneficial effects of probiotics on dysbiosis of gut microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment in healthy dogs
The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining host health. While numerous studies have explored the impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiota in humans, limited research has examined how antibiotics affect the gut microbiome in dogs. This study investigated the effects of antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiota of dogs and assessed whether probiotic supplementation could prevent antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Fourteen healthy young dogs undergoing castration were included in the study. All dogs received a single injection of cefovecin immediately after surgery. The probiotics group (7 dogs) was given a probiotic complex daily starting on the day of surgery and continuing for two weeks, while the non-probiotics group (7 dogs) received no supplementation. Fecal samples were collected on the day of surgery and two weeks later during the follow-up visit for suture removal for microbiome analysis. In microbial diversity analysis, α-diversity was significantly higher in the probiotic-supplemented group compared to the non-probiotics group (p < 0.05). β-diversity analysis revealed significant differences in microbial community composition in the non-probiotics group after antibiotic treatment (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the probiotics group. Relative abundance analysis indicated that Clostridioides, a marker of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, significantly increased in dogs without probiotics after antibiotic treatment (p < 0.05). In contrast, Butyricicoccus, a butyrate-producing bacterium with gut health benefits, was significantly enriched in the probiotics group (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that probiotic supplementation supports healthier gut microbiome recovery following antibiotic treatment and highlights its potential to enhance gut microbiota restoration and mitigate gut dysbiosis caused by antibiotics.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.