Emily C. Rowe , Ashlee R.L. Coles , Laura M. Harris-Lane , Nick Harris , Lisa Bishop , Rachel Howells , Jennifer Donnan
{"title":"考虑到年龄和性别差异,探索加拿大大麻消费的耻辱","authors":"Emily C. Rowe , Ashlee R.L. Coles , Laura M. Harris-Lane , Nick Harris , Lisa Bishop , Rachel Howells , Jennifer Donnan","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite cannabis legalization in Canada, stigma towards cannabis consumers remains evident, particularly toward younger cannabis consumers. Our study examined how stigma towards a young cannabis consumer differed by age and gender. Additionally, we explored the impacts of the participants’ cannabis consumption, age, and gender identity on their perceptions of stigma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Canadian citizens, ages 18 years and older completed an online cross-sectional survey using an experimental vignette design (<em>N</em> = 1,114). Participants were randomly assigned to read one of six vignettes depicting a cannabis consumer that varied by age (14, 21, and 28 years) and gender (man, woman). Participants completed the Social Distance Survey as the dependent measure of stigma. Two factorial ANOVAs were conducted to assess the impacts of the vignette character’s age and gender, as well as the participant’s age and gender identity, on stigma.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants (<em>Mage</em> = 48.42, <em>SD</em> = 16.64) displayed more stigmatizing attitudes towards adolescent consumers (14-years-old) compared to 21-years-old or 28-years-old consumers. Additionally, older participants (70 + years) displayed more stigmatizing attitudes than younger participants (18–29 and 30–39 years old). Finally, participants who had not consumed cannabis within the past 6-months displayed more stigmatizing attitudes than those who reported any cannabis use frequency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stigma remains a concern, particularly toward younger cannabis consumers. These findings highlight the importance of developing targeted, early interventions, and education strategies aimed at reducing stigma, especially among those who hold more stigmatizing attitudes, such as non-cannabis consumers and older individuals, which could help mitigate negative outcomes like decreased help-seeking behavior and social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Impact Statement</h3><div>Stigma toward cannabis consumers was greatest for younger consumers (14-years-old), followed by 21 and 28-year-olds. Specifically, older generations (70 + year old’s) endorsed more stigma compared to younger generations. There were no main effects on stigma toward cannabis consumers based on the vignette character’s gender or research participants’ gender identity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring cannabis consumption stigma in Canada with consideration of age and gender differences\",\"authors\":\"Emily C. Rowe , Ashlee R.L. Coles , Laura M. Harris-Lane , Nick Harris , Lisa Bishop , Rachel Howells , Jennifer Donnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite cannabis legalization in Canada, stigma towards cannabis consumers remains evident, particularly toward younger cannabis consumers. Our study examined how stigma towards a young cannabis consumer differed by age and gender. Additionally, we explored the impacts of the participants’ cannabis consumption, age, and gender identity on their perceptions of stigma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Canadian citizens, ages 18 years and older completed an online cross-sectional survey using an experimental vignette design (<em>N</em> = 1,114). Participants were randomly assigned to read one of six vignettes depicting a cannabis consumer that varied by age (14, 21, and 28 years) and gender (man, woman). Participants completed the Social Distance Survey as the dependent measure of stigma. Two factorial ANOVAs were conducted to assess the impacts of the vignette character’s age and gender, as well as the participant’s age and gender identity, on stigma.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants (<em>Mage</em> = 48.42, <em>SD</em> = 16.64) displayed more stigmatizing attitudes towards adolescent consumers (14-years-old) compared to 21-years-old or 28-years-old consumers. Additionally, older participants (70 + years) displayed more stigmatizing attitudes than younger participants (18–29 and 30–39 years old). Finally, participants who had not consumed cannabis within the past 6-months displayed more stigmatizing attitudes than those who reported any cannabis use frequency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stigma remains a concern, particularly toward younger cannabis consumers. These findings highlight the importance of developing targeted, early interventions, and education strategies aimed at reducing stigma, especially among those who hold more stigmatizing attitudes, such as non-cannabis consumers and older individuals, which could help mitigate negative outcomes like decreased help-seeking behavior and social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Impact Statement</h3><div>Stigma toward cannabis consumers was greatest for younger consumers (14-years-old), followed by 21 and 28-year-olds. Specifically, older generations (70 + year old’s) endorsed more stigma compared to younger generations. There were no main effects on stigma toward cannabis consumers based on the vignette character’s gender or research participants’ gender identity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853225000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853225000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring cannabis consumption stigma in Canada with consideration of age and gender differences
Background
Despite cannabis legalization in Canada, stigma towards cannabis consumers remains evident, particularly toward younger cannabis consumers. Our study examined how stigma towards a young cannabis consumer differed by age and gender. Additionally, we explored the impacts of the participants’ cannabis consumption, age, and gender identity on their perceptions of stigma.
Methods
Canadian citizens, ages 18 years and older completed an online cross-sectional survey using an experimental vignette design (N = 1,114). Participants were randomly assigned to read one of six vignettes depicting a cannabis consumer that varied by age (14, 21, and 28 years) and gender (man, woman). Participants completed the Social Distance Survey as the dependent measure of stigma. Two factorial ANOVAs were conducted to assess the impacts of the vignette character’s age and gender, as well as the participant’s age and gender identity, on stigma.
Results
Participants (Mage = 48.42, SD = 16.64) displayed more stigmatizing attitudes towards adolescent consumers (14-years-old) compared to 21-years-old or 28-years-old consumers. Additionally, older participants (70 + years) displayed more stigmatizing attitudes than younger participants (18–29 and 30–39 years old). Finally, participants who had not consumed cannabis within the past 6-months displayed more stigmatizing attitudes than those who reported any cannabis use frequency.
Conclusions
Stigma remains a concern, particularly toward younger cannabis consumers. These findings highlight the importance of developing targeted, early interventions, and education strategies aimed at reducing stigma, especially among those who hold more stigmatizing attitudes, such as non-cannabis consumers and older individuals, which could help mitigate negative outcomes like decreased help-seeking behavior and social isolation.
Impact Statement
Stigma toward cannabis consumers was greatest for younger consumers (14-years-old), followed by 21 and 28-year-olds. Specifically, older generations (70 + year old’s) endorsed more stigma compared to younger generations. There were no main effects on stigma toward cannabis consumers based on the vignette character’s gender or research participants’ gender identity.
期刊介绍:
Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.