家庭垃圾填埋改道及其对甲烷排放的影响

IF 5.5 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jackson C. Somers
{"title":"家庭垃圾填埋改道及其对甲烷排放的影响","authors":"Jackson C. Somers","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food waste accounts for approximately 8% of total global greenhouse emissions. Expanding organics diversion (composting) programs is a common solution for reducing methane emissions from landfills, which are primarily caused by organics. This study explores the staggered implementation of a curbside organics program expansion and finds that households increase their diversion behavior by 45%; however, the program costs per household are nine times greater than the social benefit of avoided methane. The cost/ton of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (CO2e) avoided is then estimated across the United States for these programs. The median organics program expansion would cost $478/ton of CO2e avoided. However, this estimate has substantial heterogeneity because some municipalities, particularly large cities, are served by landfills with methane capture, resulting in the largest potential methane producers having among the lowest methane emissions per household. The findings suggest that current organics program designs may be difficult to justify solely on climate grounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103174"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household landfill diversion and the impact on methane emissions\",\"authors\":\"Jackson C. Somers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Food waste accounts for approximately 8% of total global greenhouse emissions. Expanding organics diversion (composting) programs is a common solution for reducing methane emissions from landfills, which are primarily caused by organics. This study explores the staggered implementation of a curbside organics program expansion and finds that households increase their diversion behavior by 45%; however, the program costs per household are nine times greater than the social benefit of avoided methane. The cost/ton of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (CO2e) avoided is then estimated across the United States for these programs. The median organics program expansion would cost $478/ton of CO2e avoided. However, this estimate has substantial heterogeneity because some municipalities, particularly large cities, are served by landfills with methane capture, resulting in the largest potential methane producers having among the lowest methane emissions per household. The findings suggest that current organics program designs may be difficult to justify solely on climate grounds.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069625000580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069625000580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食物浪费约占全球温室气体排放总量的8%。扩大有机转移(堆肥)计划是减少垃圾填埋场甲烷排放的常见解决方案,甲烷排放主要由有机物引起。本研究探讨了路边有机项目扩展的交错实施,发现家庭的转移行为增加了45%;然而,每户家庭的项目成本是避免使用甲烷的社会效益的九倍。然后估算这些项目在美国避免的每吨二氧化碳当量排放(CO2e)的成本。有机项目扩张的平均成本为每吨二氧化碳当量减少478美元。然而,这一估计存在很大的不均匀性,因为一些城市,特别是大城市,是由具有甲烷捕获的垃圾填埋场提供服务的,因此,最大的潜在甲烷生产者的每户甲烷排放量最低。研究结果表明,目前的有机项目设计可能很难仅仅从气候的角度来证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Household landfill diversion and the impact on methane emissions
Food waste accounts for approximately 8% of total global greenhouse emissions. Expanding organics diversion (composting) programs is a common solution for reducing methane emissions from landfills, which are primarily caused by organics. This study explores the staggered implementation of a curbside organics program expansion and finds that households increase their diversion behavior by 45%; however, the program costs per household are nine times greater than the social benefit of avoided methane. The cost/ton of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (CO2e) avoided is then estimated across the United States for these programs. The median organics program expansion would cost $478/ton of CO2e avoided. However, this estimate has substantial heterogeneity because some municipalities, particularly large cities, are served by landfills with methane capture, resulting in the largest potential methane producers having among the lowest methane emissions per household. The findings suggest that current organics program designs may be difficult to justify solely on climate grounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to specific natural resources and environmental issues. For consideration, papers should (1) contain a substantial element embodying the linkage between economic systems and environmental and natural resources systems or (2) be of substantial importance in understanding the management and/or social control of the economy in its relations with the natural environment. Although the general orientation of the journal is toward economics, interdisciplinary papers by researchers in other fields of interest to resource and environmental economists will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信