{"title":"听觉等效的连续变化的视觉刺激能改善节拍同步吗?支持视觉是感觉运动计时中可靠的模式的证据","authors":"Yingyu Huang , Chaolun Wang , Xiang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although synchronization to a perceived regular beat in time has been established to be much less variable for discrete auditory stimuli, such as tones, than for discrete visual stimuli, such as flashes, recent advances in beat synchronization research have demonstrated that visual beat synchronization can be substantially improved and become comparable to auditory tones when employing continuously moving visual stimuli. It therefore has been suggested that the difference in modality is an important but not necessarily dominant factor for beat synchronization. However, doubts exist in favoring auditory dominance, as comparing continuously varying visual stimuli with discrete auditory stimuli is considered unfair. Here, based on a periodically contracting ring for which the spatial displacement continuously varied with a constant acceleration, we devised an equivalent in the auditory domain: an amplitude-modulated sound whose amplitude continuously varied with an acceleration of the same magnitude. The results showed that beat synchronization performance of the amplitude-modulated sound was not greater than that of the tone or the contracting ring. The present finding supports that vision is a trustworthy modality for sensorimotor timing processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 108616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could an auditory equivalent to a continuously varying visual stimulus improve beat synchronization? Evidence supporting vision as a trustworthy modality in sensorimotor timing\",\"authors\":\"Yingyu Huang , Chaolun Wang , Xiang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although synchronization to a perceived regular beat in time has been established to be much less variable for discrete auditory stimuli, such as tones, than for discrete visual stimuli, such as flashes, recent advances in beat synchronization research have demonstrated that visual beat synchronization can be substantially improved and become comparable to auditory tones when employing continuously moving visual stimuli. It therefore has been suggested that the difference in modality is an important but not necessarily dominant factor for beat synchronization. However, doubts exist in favoring auditory dominance, as comparing continuously varying visual stimuli with discrete auditory stimuli is considered unfair. Here, based on a periodically contracting ring for which the spatial displacement continuously varied with a constant acceleration, we devised an equivalent in the auditory domain: an amplitude-modulated sound whose amplitude continuously varied with an acceleration of the same magnitude. The results showed that beat synchronization performance of the amplitude-modulated sound was not greater than that of the tone or the contracting ring. The present finding supports that vision is a trustworthy modality for sensorimotor timing processing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"232 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004269892500077X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004269892500077X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Could an auditory equivalent to a continuously varying visual stimulus improve beat synchronization? Evidence supporting vision as a trustworthy modality in sensorimotor timing
Although synchronization to a perceived regular beat in time has been established to be much less variable for discrete auditory stimuli, such as tones, than for discrete visual stimuli, such as flashes, recent advances in beat synchronization research have demonstrated that visual beat synchronization can be substantially improved and become comparable to auditory tones when employing continuously moving visual stimuli. It therefore has been suggested that the difference in modality is an important but not necessarily dominant factor for beat synchronization. However, doubts exist in favoring auditory dominance, as comparing continuously varying visual stimuli with discrete auditory stimuli is considered unfair. Here, based on a periodically contracting ring for which the spatial displacement continuously varied with a constant acceleration, we devised an equivalent in the auditory domain: an amplitude-modulated sound whose amplitude continuously varied with an acceleration of the same magnitude. The results showed that beat synchronization performance of the amplitude-modulated sound was not greater than that of the tone or the contracting ring. The present finding supports that vision is a trustworthy modality for sensorimotor timing processing.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.