{"title":"碳社会成本的趋势和偏见","authors":"Richard S. J. Tol","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An updated and extended meta‐analysis confirms that the central estimate of the social cost of carbon is around $200–250/tC ($700–900/tCO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>) with a large, right‐skewed uncertainty and trending up as ethical views have changed. The pure rate of time preference and the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions, the total impact of 2.5℃ warming less so. The social cost of carbon is much higher if climate change is assumed to affect economic growth rather than the levels of output and welfare. The literature is dominated by a relatively small network of authors, based in a few countries. Publication and citation bias may have pushed the social cost of carbon up.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends and biases in the social cost of carbon\",\"authors\":\"Richard S. J. Tol\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nyas.15340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An updated and extended meta‐analysis confirms that the central estimate of the social cost of carbon is around $200–250/tC ($700–900/tCO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>) with a large, right‐skewed uncertainty and trending up as ethical views have changed. The pure rate of time preference and the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions, the total impact of 2.5℃ warming less so. The social cost of carbon is much higher if climate change is assumed to affect economic growth rather than the levels of output and welfare. The literature is dominated by a relatively small network of authors, based in a few countries. Publication and citation bias may have pushed the social cost of carbon up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An updated and extended meta‐analysis confirms that the central estimate of the social cost of carbon is around $200–250/tC ($700–900/tCO2) with a large, right‐skewed uncertainty and trending up as ethical views have changed. The pure rate of time preference and the inverse of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are key assumptions, the total impact of 2.5℃ warming less so. The social cost of carbon is much higher if climate change is assumed to affect economic growth rather than the levels of output and welfare. The literature is dominated by a relatively small network of authors, based in a few countries. Publication and citation bias may have pushed the social cost of carbon up.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.