公共土地上的生物多样性:社区科学如何提供帮助

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Amanda M. Katzer, Erin E. Boydston, Michael E. Akresh, Jennifer S. Briggs, Kelsey Cooper, Vijay Barve, Lena Lee, Toni Lyn Morelli
{"title":"公共土地上的生物多样性:社区科学如何提供帮助","authors":"Amanda M. Katzer,&nbsp;Erin E. Boydston,&nbsp;Michael E. Akresh,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Briggs,&nbsp;Kelsey Cooper,&nbsp;Vijay Barve,&nbsp;Lena Lee,&nbsp;Toni Lyn Morelli","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Species inventories are crucial for conservation but are difficult to assemble and maintain. Bioblitzes, which encourage the public to document biodiversity in a particular area and timeframe, may offer useful information, but their integration with other datasets poses challenges. We investigated the potential contribution of bioblitzes to natural resource management using observations from the United States National Park Service (NPS) 2016 Centennial Bioblitz. Through automated cross-referencing over 19,000 iNaturalist “research-grade” observations from 107 national parks with existing park inventory lists, we matched 86% of species documented in the Bioblitz to NPS species lists based on current taxonomy and matched another 6% of species using alternative scientific names through our matching process in R. Of the remaining 13.5% that did not match the NPS species lists, 84% of the unmatched species were manually found within the lists or were outside the boundaries of the park, identifying 141 native species that were unrecorded in NPS species lists. Many introduced species were recorded more often in parks closer to cities. Parks near cities also drew more participants. Our study shows how public participation through iNaturalist and bioblitzes can facilitate biodiversity monitoring across large spatial scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity on public lands: How community science can help\",\"authors\":\"Amanda M. Katzer,&nbsp;Erin E. Boydston,&nbsp;Michael E. Akresh,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Briggs,&nbsp;Kelsey Cooper,&nbsp;Vijay Barve,&nbsp;Lena Lee,&nbsp;Toni Lyn Morelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/csp2.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Species inventories are crucial for conservation but are difficult to assemble and maintain. Bioblitzes, which encourage the public to document biodiversity in a particular area and timeframe, may offer useful information, but their integration with other datasets poses challenges. We investigated the potential contribution of bioblitzes to natural resource management using observations from the United States National Park Service (NPS) 2016 Centennial Bioblitz. Through automated cross-referencing over 19,000 iNaturalist “research-grade” observations from 107 national parks with existing park inventory lists, we matched 86% of species documented in the Bioblitz to NPS species lists based on current taxonomy and matched another 6% of species using alternative scientific names through our matching process in R. Of the remaining 13.5% that did not match the NPS species lists, 84% of the unmatched species were manually found within the lists or were outside the boundaries of the park, identifying 141 native species that were unrecorded in NPS species lists. Many introduced species were recorded more often in parks closer to cities. Parks near cities also drew more participants. Our study shows how public participation through iNaturalist and bioblitzes can facilitate biodiversity monitoring across large spatial scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种清单对保护至关重要,但很难收集和维护。鼓励公众记录特定地区和时间框架内生物多样性的“生物闪电式”可能会提供有用的信息,但它们与其他数据集的整合带来了挑战。我们利用美国国家公园管理局(NPS) 2016年百年生物闪电战的观测资料,调查了生物闪电战对自然资源管理的潜在贡献。通过自动交叉参考来自107个国家公园的19,000多个“研究级”观察结果,我们根据现有的公园清单,将生物blitz中记录的86%的物种与NPS物种清单相匹配,并通过我们在r中的匹配过程使用替代学名匹配另外6%的物种。84%的不匹配物种是人工在名单内或在公园边界外发现的,确定了141种未记录在NPS物种名单中的本地物种。许多引进物种更常在靠近城市的公园里被记录下来。城市附近的公园也吸引了更多的参与者。我们的研究表明,通过自然主义和生物闪电式活动的公众参与可以促进大空间尺度上的生物多样性监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biodiversity on public lands: How community science can help

Biodiversity on public lands: How community science can help

Species inventories are crucial for conservation but are difficult to assemble and maintain. Bioblitzes, which encourage the public to document biodiversity in a particular area and timeframe, may offer useful information, but their integration with other datasets poses challenges. We investigated the potential contribution of bioblitzes to natural resource management using observations from the United States National Park Service (NPS) 2016 Centennial Bioblitz. Through automated cross-referencing over 19,000 iNaturalist “research-grade” observations from 107 national parks with existing park inventory lists, we matched 86% of species documented in the Bioblitz to NPS species lists based on current taxonomy and matched another 6% of species using alternative scientific names through our matching process in R. Of the remaining 13.5% that did not match the NPS species lists, 84% of the unmatched species were manually found within the lists or were outside the boundaries of the park, identifying 141 native species that were unrecorded in NPS species lists. Many introduced species were recorded more often in parks closer to cities. Parks near cities also drew more participants. Our study shows how public participation through iNaturalist and bioblitzes can facilitate biodiversity monitoring across large spatial scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信