智能新能源汽车二冲程自由活塞直线发电机合理进排气工艺调度

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Dequan Zeng, Jun Lu, Yiming Hu, Peizhi Zhang, Jinwen Yang, Qin Yu, Xiaoliang Wang
{"title":"智能新能源汽车二冲程自由活塞直线发电机合理进排气工艺调度","authors":"Dequan Zeng,&nbsp;Jun Lu,&nbsp;Yiming Hu,&nbsp;Peizhi Zhang,&nbsp;Jinwen Yang,&nbsp;Qin Yu,&nbsp;Xiaoliang Wang","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Considered a promising power plant offering 25% higher efficiency than conventional reciprocating engines, the free piston linear generator (FPLG) has garnered significant attention due to its breakthrough design that eliminates the crank-connecting rod, thereby achieving enhanced efficiency. However, this structural innovation is a double-edged sword, while having the advantages such as compact structure and short transfer path to reduce energy loss, it inevitably makes the stability of the system sensitive to the operating parameters of the intake and exhaust process, which is extremely easy to lead to instability shutdown or knock. Aiming at scheduling the intake and exhaust processes rationally for system stabilization, a fast numerical method is proposed, which is different from the existing research methods. It does not need to rely on extremely time-consuming and complex CFD models, while taking into account the intake and exhaust processes as a whole rather than treating each as a separate part. The fast numerical method mainly consists of four steps. First, the gas mass variations in-cylinder and in-port due to fuel injection quality are defined. Second, gas flow is established in the valve geometry and operation pressure. Employed gas mass and gas flow, the intake pressure, the exhaust pressure, the allowable duration, and the time consumption would be settled. Third, the total power subsection is used to compute certain fuel quality. Finally, the piston dynamics are applied to calculate piston displacement for objecting valve operation and piston velocity for simulating FPLG output power. The results show that the cyclic fuel injection quality is 42–53 mg for the output power about 12.5 kW, and total efficiency about 35.5%; the intake pressure would be not less than 1.83 atm when the compression ratio is from 8 to 10 and the exhaust pressure ranges from 3.78 to 6 atm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 5","pages":"2428-2439"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasonable Intake and Exhaust Processes Scheduling of Two-Stroke Free Piston Linear Generator for Intelligent New Energy Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Dequan Zeng,&nbsp;Jun Lu,&nbsp;Yiming Hu,&nbsp;Peizhi Zhang,&nbsp;Jinwen Yang,&nbsp;Qin Yu,&nbsp;Xiaoliang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Considered a promising power plant offering 25% higher efficiency than conventional reciprocating engines, the free piston linear generator (FPLG) has garnered significant attention due to its breakthrough design that eliminates the crank-connecting rod, thereby achieving enhanced efficiency. However, this structural innovation is a double-edged sword, while having the advantages such as compact structure and short transfer path to reduce energy loss, it inevitably makes the stability of the system sensitive to the operating parameters of the intake and exhaust process, which is extremely easy to lead to instability shutdown or knock. Aiming at scheduling the intake and exhaust processes rationally for system stabilization, a fast numerical method is proposed, which is different from the existing research methods. It does not need to rely on extremely time-consuming and complex CFD models, while taking into account the intake and exhaust processes as a whole rather than treating each as a separate part. The fast numerical method mainly consists of four steps. First, the gas mass variations in-cylinder and in-port due to fuel injection quality are defined. Second, gas flow is established in the valve geometry and operation pressure. Employed gas mass and gas flow, the intake pressure, the exhaust pressure, the allowable duration, and the time consumption would be settled. Third, the total power subsection is used to compute certain fuel quality. Finally, the piston dynamics are applied to calculate piston displacement for objecting valve operation and piston velocity for simulating FPLG output power. The results show that the cyclic fuel injection quality is 42–53 mg for the output power about 12.5 kW, and total efficiency about 35.5%; the intake pressure would be not less than 1.83 atm when the compression ratio is from 8 to 10 and the exhaust pressure ranges from 3.78 to 6 atm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"2428-2439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自由活塞直线发电机(FPLG)被认为是一种很有前途的动力装置,其效率比传统往复式发动机高出25%,由于其突破性的设计,消除了曲柄连杆,从而提高了效率,因此受到了极大的关注。然而,这种结构创新是一把双刃剑,在具有结构紧凑、传递路径短以减少能量损失等优点的同时,不可避免地使系统的稳定性对进气和排气过程的运行参数敏感,极易导致不稳定停机或爆震。针对合理调度进气排气过程以达到系统稳定的目的,提出了一种不同于现有研究方法的快速数值方法。它不需要依赖极其耗时和复杂的CFD模型,同时将进气和排气过程作为一个整体来考虑,而不是将每个过程视为单独的部分。快速数值方法主要包括四个步骤。首先,定义了燃油喷射质量对缸内和缸内气体质量的影响。其次,气体流量是建立在阀门几何形状和操作压力上的。采用的气体质量和气体流量,进气压力,排气压力,允许持续时间和时间消耗将得到解决。第三,利用总功率分段计算一定的燃油质量。最后,利用活塞动力学计算了模拟阀门工作的活塞位移和模拟FPLG输出功率的活塞速度。结果表明:在12.5 kW左右的输出功率下,循环喷油质量为42 ~ 53 mg,总效率为35.5%;压缩比为8 ~ 10时,进气压力不小于1.83 atm,排气压力为3.78 ~ 6 atm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reasonable Intake and Exhaust Processes Scheduling of Two-Stroke Free Piston Linear Generator for Intelligent New Energy Vehicles

Reasonable Intake and Exhaust Processes Scheduling of Two-Stroke Free Piston Linear Generator for Intelligent New Energy Vehicles

Considered a promising power plant offering 25% higher efficiency than conventional reciprocating engines, the free piston linear generator (FPLG) has garnered significant attention due to its breakthrough design that eliminates the crank-connecting rod, thereby achieving enhanced efficiency. However, this structural innovation is a double-edged sword, while having the advantages such as compact structure and short transfer path to reduce energy loss, it inevitably makes the stability of the system sensitive to the operating parameters of the intake and exhaust process, which is extremely easy to lead to instability shutdown or knock. Aiming at scheduling the intake and exhaust processes rationally for system stabilization, a fast numerical method is proposed, which is different from the existing research methods. It does not need to rely on extremely time-consuming and complex CFD models, while taking into account the intake and exhaust processes as a whole rather than treating each as a separate part. The fast numerical method mainly consists of four steps. First, the gas mass variations in-cylinder and in-port due to fuel injection quality are defined. Second, gas flow is established in the valve geometry and operation pressure. Employed gas mass and gas flow, the intake pressure, the exhaust pressure, the allowable duration, and the time consumption would be settled. Third, the total power subsection is used to compute certain fuel quality. Finally, the piston dynamics are applied to calculate piston displacement for objecting valve operation and piston velocity for simulating FPLG output power. The results show that the cyclic fuel injection quality is 42–53 mg for the output power about 12.5 kW, and total efficiency about 35.5%; the intake pressure would be not less than 1.83 atm when the compression ratio is from 8 to 10 and the exhaust pressure ranges from 3.78 to 6 atm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信