Scott K. Odorico, Muhammad Sabry Mazroua, Leda Wang, Andrew Awadallah, Serena Day, Christin Harless, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Aparna Vijayasekaran
{"title":"输注肝素抢救自体乳房重建游离皮瓣的疗效及发病率","authors":"Scott K. Odorico, Muhammad Sabry Mazroua, Leda Wang, Andrew Awadallah, Serena Day, Christin Harless, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Aparna Vijayasekaran","doi":"10.1002/micr.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Abdominal-based free flaps are the mainstay in autologous breast reconstruction. Their safety and consistency in outcomes are well-documented. When flap compromise occurs, operative salvage is the gold standard. However, when—and if—to place these patients on heparin infusions is unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate abdominal-based free flap compromise and compare outcomes with and without heparin infusion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single-institution, multiple-surgeon, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing autologous, abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction who experienced anastomotic compromise within a 6-year period. Treatment and outcomes data collected include flap salvage, hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-one flaps had evidence of compromise. A total of 31 (60.8%) patients were placed on heparin infusions after experiencing anastomotic compromise, compared to 20 who did not receive heparin infusion. Thirty-five patients (68.6%) underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Twenty-six patients (51%) experienced venous congestion, 22 patients (43.1%) experienced arterial compromise, and three (5.9%) experienced both. Twenty-eight patients (54.9%) received tissue plasminogen activator; in the heparin infusion group, 21 patients (67.7%) received tissue plasminogen activator. The total salvage rate of compromised flaps was 94.1% (48/51). There was no significant difference between heparin infusion and standard cares in length of hospital stay, length of drains in-place, successful salvage (93.5% vs. 95%), hematoma (19.4% vs. 15%), fat necrosis, SSI, hospital readmission (19.4% vs. 15%), and return rates to the operating room (48.4% vs. 50%). However, there was a significantly higher transfusion rate in patients receiving heparin infusion (38.7% vs. 10%). Of the 25 flaps with evidence of thrombosis, 72% were placed on heparin infusions while 28% were not; there was no significant difference in salvage rate in this sub-group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This review of autologous breast reconstruction free flap compromise provides evidence of similar safety profiles, with similar salvage rates, when comparing salvage with and without heparin infusion; there is a higher transfusion requirement when treating with heparin infusion.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Morbidity of Heparin Infusion in Salvaging Autologous Breast Reconstruction Free Flaps\",\"authors\":\"Scott K. Odorico, Muhammad Sabry Mazroua, Leda Wang, Andrew Awadallah, Serena Day, Christin Harless, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Aparna Vijayasekaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Abdominal-based free flaps are the mainstay in autologous breast reconstruction. Their safety and consistency in outcomes are well-documented. When flap compromise occurs, operative salvage is the gold standard. However, when—and if—to place these patients on heparin infusions is unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate abdominal-based free flap compromise and compare outcomes with and without heparin infusion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a single-institution, multiple-surgeon, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing autologous, abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction who experienced anastomotic compromise within a 6-year period. Treatment and outcomes data collected include flap salvage, hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifty-one flaps had evidence of compromise. A total of 31 (60.8%) patients were placed on heparin infusions after experiencing anastomotic compromise, compared to 20 who did not receive heparin infusion. Thirty-five patients (68.6%) underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Twenty-six patients (51%) experienced venous congestion, 22 patients (43.1%) experienced arterial compromise, and three (5.9%) experienced both. Twenty-eight patients (54.9%) received tissue plasminogen activator; in the heparin infusion group, 21 patients (67.7%) received tissue plasminogen activator. The total salvage rate of compromised flaps was 94.1% (48/51). There was no significant difference between heparin infusion and standard cares in length of hospital stay, length of drains in-place, successful salvage (93.5% vs. 95%), hematoma (19.4% vs. 15%), fat necrosis, SSI, hospital readmission (19.4% vs. 15%), and return rates to the operating room (48.4% vs. 50%). However, there was a significantly higher transfusion rate in patients receiving heparin infusion (38.7% vs. 10%). Of the 25 flaps with evidence of thrombosis, 72% were placed on heparin infusions while 28% were not; there was no significant difference in salvage rate in this sub-group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review of autologous breast reconstruction free flap compromise provides evidence of similar safety profiles, with similar salvage rates, when comparing salvage with and without heparin infusion; there is a higher transfusion requirement when treating with heparin infusion.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景腹部游离皮瓣是自体乳房重建术的主流。它们的安全性和结果的一致性是有据可查的。当皮瓣受损时,手术挽救是金标准。然而,何时以及是否给这些病人注射肝素还不清楚。本研究的目的是调查腹部自由皮瓣的损害,并比较输注肝素和不输注肝素的结果。材料和方法:本研究是一项单机构、多外科医生的回顾性研究,回顾了6年内吻合口受损的自体腹部自由皮瓣乳房重建术患者。收集的治疗和结局数据包括皮瓣保留、血肿、血肿、手术部位感染(SSI)、输血需求和住院时间。结果51个皮瓣有受损迹象。共有31例(60.8%)患者在吻合口受损后接受肝素输注,而20例患者未接受肝素输注。35例(68.6%)患者行深下腹壁穿支皮瓣。静脉充血26例(51%),动脉受累22例(43.1%),两者兼有3例(5.9%)。28例(54.9%)患者接受组织型纤溶酶原激活剂;肝素输注组21例(67.7%)患者使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂。受损皮瓣的总抢救率为94.1%(48/51)。肝素输注与标准护理在住院时间、引流管放置时间、抢救成功(93.5% vs 95%)、血肿(19.4% vs 15%)、脂肪坏死、SSI、再入院(19.4% vs 15%)和返回手术室率(48.4% vs 50%)方面无显著差异。然而,接受肝素输注的患者输血率明显更高(38.7% vs. 10%)。在25个有血栓形成证据的皮瓣中,72%给予肝素输注,28%未给予肝素输注;两组间抢救率无显著性差异。结论:本综述对自体乳房重建游离皮瓣妥协提供了相似的安全性和相似的挽回率的证据,与肝素输注和不输注的挽回率相比;肝素输注治疗时输血需要量较高。
Efficacy and Morbidity of Heparin Infusion in Salvaging Autologous Breast Reconstruction Free Flaps
Background
Abdominal-based free flaps are the mainstay in autologous breast reconstruction. Their safety and consistency in outcomes are well-documented. When flap compromise occurs, operative salvage is the gold standard. However, when—and if—to place these patients on heparin infusions is unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate abdominal-based free flap compromise and compare outcomes with and without heparin infusion.
Materials and Methods
This was a single-institution, multiple-surgeon, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing autologous, abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction who experienced anastomotic compromise within a 6-year period. Treatment and outcomes data collected include flap salvage, hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay.
Results
Fifty-one flaps had evidence of compromise. A total of 31 (60.8%) patients were placed on heparin infusions after experiencing anastomotic compromise, compared to 20 who did not receive heparin infusion. Thirty-five patients (68.6%) underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Twenty-six patients (51%) experienced venous congestion, 22 patients (43.1%) experienced arterial compromise, and three (5.9%) experienced both. Twenty-eight patients (54.9%) received tissue plasminogen activator; in the heparin infusion group, 21 patients (67.7%) received tissue plasminogen activator. The total salvage rate of compromised flaps was 94.1% (48/51). There was no significant difference between heparin infusion and standard cares in length of hospital stay, length of drains in-place, successful salvage (93.5% vs. 95%), hematoma (19.4% vs. 15%), fat necrosis, SSI, hospital readmission (19.4% vs. 15%), and return rates to the operating room (48.4% vs. 50%). However, there was a significantly higher transfusion rate in patients receiving heparin infusion (38.7% vs. 10%). Of the 25 flaps with evidence of thrombosis, 72% were placed on heparin infusions while 28% were not; there was no significant difference in salvage rate in this sub-group.
Conclusions
This review of autologous breast reconstruction free flap compromise provides evidence of similar safety profiles, with similar salvage rates, when comparing salvage with and without heparin infusion; there is a higher transfusion requirement when treating with heparin infusion.
期刊介绍:
Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.