工程应用的优先多步决策灰狼优化算法

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Idriss Dagal, Alpaslan Demirci, Ambe Harrison, Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso, Said Mirza Tercan, Burak Akın, Kürşat Tanriöven, Havva Aysun Sezgin Köksal, Ahmet Nayir
{"title":"工程应用的优先多步决策灰狼优化算法","authors":"Idriss Dagal,&nbsp;Alpaslan Demirci,&nbsp;Ambe Harrison,&nbsp;Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso,&nbsp;Said Mirza Tercan,&nbsp;Burak Akın,&nbsp;Kürşat Tanriöven,&nbsp;Havva Aysun Sezgin Köksal,&nbsp;Ahmet Nayir","doi":"10.1002/eng2.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article introduces the Prey-Movement Strategy Gray Wolf Optimizer (PMS-GWO), an enhanced version of the Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) designed to improve optimization efficiency through a novel multi-step decision-making process. By integrating adaptive exploration–exploitation strategies, PMS-GWO dynamically manages leadership roles, balances local and global searches, and introduces a prey escape mechanism, significantly improving solution diversity. Comparative analysis across 23 benchmark functions demonstrates PMS-GWO's superior performance, achieving up to 28.6% faster convergence and a 55.5%–93.8% increase in solution accuracy compared to the standard GWO. Notably, PMS-GWO enhances computational efficiency by 21.7%–27.4% and shows a 168.8% improvement in solution accuracy for the complex Michalewicz function over the baseline GWO. Visual convergence speed analysis, evidenced by a rapid fitness value decline within 100 iterations, reveals PMS-GWO's quickest convergence time of 0.02 s among tested algorithms. Furthermore, a comparison of runtime for several algorithms, including PMS-GWO, MMCCS-GWO, CC-GWO, MGWO, and GWO, clearly indicates that PMS-GWO achieves the lowest runtime of 2.364 s, significantly faster than CC-GWO and MGWO, which both exceed 5 s. This visual representation highlights the computational efficiency of PMS-GWO compared to other algorithms. PMS-GWO also outperforms advanced GWO variants like MMSCC-GWO, MGWO, and CCS-GWO, particularly in complex optimization landscapes, highlighting its adaptability and effectiveness for real-world applications in energy systems and engineering design. The multi-step decision-making process implemented in PMS-GWO is critical to achieving these improved convergence and diversity metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72922,"journal":{"name":"Engineering reports : open access","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.70154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritized Multi-Step Decision-Making Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Engineering Applications\",\"authors\":\"Idriss Dagal,&nbsp;Alpaslan Demirci,&nbsp;Ambe Harrison,&nbsp;Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso,&nbsp;Said Mirza Tercan,&nbsp;Burak Akın,&nbsp;Kürşat Tanriöven,&nbsp;Havva Aysun Sezgin Köksal,&nbsp;Ahmet Nayir\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eng2.70154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article introduces the Prey-Movement Strategy Gray Wolf Optimizer (PMS-GWO), an enhanced version of the Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) designed to improve optimization efficiency through a novel multi-step decision-making process. By integrating adaptive exploration–exploitation strategies, PMS-GWO dynamically manages leadership roles, balances local and global searches, and introduces a prey escape mechanism, significantly improving solution diversity. Comparative analysis across 23 benchmark functions demonstrates PMS-GWO's superior performance, achieving up to 28.6% faster convergence and a 55.5%–93.8% increase in solution accuracy compared to the standard GWO. Notably, PMS-GWO enhances computational efficiency by 21.7%–27.4% and shows a 168.8% improvement in solution accuracy for the complex Michalewicz function over the baseline GWO. Visual convergence speed analysis, evidenced by a rapid fitness value decline within 100 iterations, reveals PMS-GWO's quickest convergence time of 0.02 s among tested algorithms. Furthermore, a comparison of runtime for several algorithms, including PMS-GWO, MMCCS-GWO, CC-GWO, MGWO, and GWO, clearly indicates that PMS-GWO achieves the lowest runtime of 2.364 s, significantly faster than CC-GWO and MGWO, which both exceed 5 s. This visual representation highlights the computational efficiency of PMS-GWO compared to other algorithms. PMS-GWO also outperforms advanced GWO variants like MMSCC-GWO, MGWO, and CCS-GWO, particularly in complex optimization landscapes, highlighting its adaptability and effectiveness for real-world applications in energy systems and engineering design. The multi-step decision-making process implemented in PMS-GWO is critical to achieving these improved convergence and diversity metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering reports : open access\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.70154\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering reports : open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering reports : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了猎物-运动策略灰狼优化器(PMS-GWO),它是灰狼优化器(GWO)的改进版本,旨在通过一种新的多步骤决策过程来提高优化效率。通过整合自适应探索-开发策略,PMS-GWO动态管理领导角色,平衡局部和全局搜索,并引入猎物逃脱机制,显著提高了解决方案的多样性。23个基准函数的对比分析表明,与标准GWO相比,PMS-GWO的收敛速度提高了28.6%,求解精度提高了55.5%-93.8%。值得注意的是,与基线GWO相比,PMS-GWO的计算效率提高了21.7%-27.4%,复杂Michalewicz函数的求解精度提高了168.8%。视觉收敛速度分析表明,在100次迭代内适应度值迅速下降,PMS-GWO在测试算法中最快收敛时间为0.02 s。此外,对比PMS-GWO、MMCCS-GWO、CC-GWO、MGWO和GWO算法的运行时间,PMS-GWO的运行时间最低,为2.364 s,明显快于CC-GWO和MGWO,两者的运行时间均超过5 s。与其他算法相比,这种可视化表示突出了PMS-GWO的计算效率。PMS-GWO还优于先进的GWO变体,如MMSCC-GWO、MGWO和CCS-GWO,特别是在复杂的优化场景中,突出了其在能源系统和工程设计中的实际应用的适应性和有效性。在PMS-GWO中实施的多步骤决策过程对于实现这些改进的收敛性和多样性指标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prioritized Multi-Step Decision-Making Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Engineering Applications

Prioritized Multi-Step Decision-Making Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Engineering Applications

This article introduces the Prey-Movement Strategy Gray Wolf Optimizer (PMS-GWO), an enhanced version of the Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) designed to improve optimization efficiency through a novel multi-step decision-making process. By integrating adaptive exploration–exploitation strategies, PMS-GWO dynamically manages leadership roles, balances local and global searches, and introduces a prey escape mechanism, significantly improving solution diversity. Comparative analysis across 23 benchmark functions demonstrates PMS-GWO's superior performance, achieving up to 28.6% faster convergence and a 55.5%–93.8% increase in solution accuracy compared to the standard GWO. Notably, PMS-GWO enhances computational efficiency by 21.7%–27.4% and shows a 168.8% improvement in solution accuracy for the complex Michalewicz function over the baseline GWO. Visual convergence speed analysis, evidenced by a rapid fitness value decline within 100 iterations, reveals PMS-GWO's quickest convergence time of 0.02 s among tested algorithms. Furthermore, a comparison of runtime for several algorithms, including PMS-GWO, MMCCS-GWO, CC-GWO, MGWO, and GWO, clearly indicates that PMS-GWO achieves the lowest runtime of 2.364 s, significantly faster than CC-GWO and MGWO, which both exceed 5 s. This visual representation highlights the computational efficiency of PMS-GWO compared to other algorithms. PMS-GWO also outperforms advanced GWO variants like MMSCC-GWO, MGWO, and CCS-GWO, particularly in complex optimization landscapes, highlighting its adaptability and effectiveness for real-world applications in energy systems and engineering design. The multi-step decision-making process implemented in PMS-GWO is critical to achieving these improved convergence and diversity metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信