整合系统和有针对性的粪便收集方法,以估计土著土地上具有重要文化意义的濒危物种的丰度

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Hayley M. Geyle, Myra Herbert, Laura Doolan, North Tanami Rangers, Sam Banks, Chris R. Dickman, Kelly M. Dixon, Catherine J. Robinson, Christine Schlesinger
{"title":"整合系统和有针对性的粪便收集方法,以估计土著土地上具有重要文化意义的濒危物种的丰度","authors":"Hayley M. Geyle,&nbsp;Myra Herbert,&nbsp;Laura Doolan,&nbsp;North Tanami Rangers,&nbsp;Sam Banks,&nbsp;Chris R. Dickman,&nbsp;Kelly M. Dixon,&nbsp;Catherine J. Robinson,&nbsp;Christine Schlesinger","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estimating the abundance of threatened species can be extremely difficult. This is particularly true in remote regions, where surveys are often expensive and subject to logistical challenges. Where threatened species occur on Indigenous lands, collaborative work between Indigenous people and ecologists who share an interest in the conservation and management of these species may resolve some of these challenges while also meeting additional local objectives. Here, we show the value of integrating two on-ground methods for non-invasive genetic sampling of scat to estimate the abundance of the greater bilby (<i>Macrotis lagotis</i>), a species highly significant to Indigenous people of central Australia that is threatened with extinction. We compared two on-ground methods: (1) systematic surveys, designed to be repeatable, stratified, and standardized, and (2) targeted surveys, which focused on areas where bilby sign was present and involved a more flexible and intuitive search technique undertaken collaboratively with local Indigenous people and informed by their knowledge and skills. We compared different combinations of the two methods and different sampling intensities to explore how they affected modeled estimates of bilby abundance, derived by combining information on individual bilby identities (from DNA extracted from scat) with spatially explicit capture–recapture modeling. We found that combining targeted methods for scat collection with systematic sampling provided the best modeled estimates of bilby abundance and improved modeled estimates for lower overall effort than increasing systematic sampling. This approach also allowed for the inclusion of diverse knowledges and approaches to detecting species (scat) presence. By weaving multiple approaches to find and identify bilby scat, we show how collaborative knowledge-sharing practices can also deliver multiple benefits to Indigenous and science partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating systematic and targeted scat collection approaches to estimate the abundance of a culturally significant threatened species on Indigenous lands\",\"authors\":\"Hayley M. Geyle,&nbsp;Myra Herbert,&nbsp;Laura Doolan,&nbsp;North Tanami Rangers,&nbsp;Sam Banks,&nbsp;Chris R. Dickman,&nbsp;Kelly M. Dixon,&nbsp;Catherine J. Robinson,&nbsp;Christine Schlesinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/csp2.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Estimating the abundance of threatened species can be extremely difficult. This is particularly true in remote regions, where surveys are often expensive and subject to logistical challenges. Where threatened species occur on Indigenous lands, collaborative work between Indigenous people and ecologists who share an interest in the conservation and management of these species may resolve some of these challenges while also meeting additional local objectives. Here, we show the value of integrating two on-ground methods for non-invasive genetic sampling of scat to estimate the abundance of the greater bilby (<i>Macrotis lagotis</i>), a species highly significant to Indigenous people of central Australia that is threatened with extinction. We compared two on-ground methods: (1) systematic surveys, designed to be repeatable, stratified, and standardized, and (2) targeted surveys, which focused on areas where bilby sign was present and involved a more flexible and intuitive search technique undertaken collaboratively with local Indigenous people and informed by their knowledge and skills. We compared different combinations of the two methods and different sampling intensities to explore how they affected modeled estimates of bilby abundance, derived by combining information on individual bilby identities (from DNA extracted from scat) with spatially explicit capture–recapture modeling. We found that combining targeted methods for scat collection with systematic sampling provided the best modeled estimates of bilby abundance and improved modeled estimates for lower overall effort than increasing systematic sampling. This approach also allowed for the inclusion of diverse knowledges and approaches to detecting species (scat) presence. By weaving multiple approaches to find and identify bilby scat, we show how collaborative knowledge-sharing practices can also deliver multiple benefits to Indigenous and science partners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70034\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70034\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估计濒危物种的数量是非常困难的。在偏远地区尤其如此,那里的调查往往费用高昂,而且面临后勤方面的挑战。当濒危物种出现在土著土地上时,土著居民和对这些物种的保护和管理有共同兴趣的生态学家之间的合作可能会解决其中的一些挑战,同时也能实现其他的地方目标。在这里,我们展示了整合两种对粪便进行非侵入性遗传采样的地面方法的价值,以估计大兔耳袋狸(Macrotis lagotis)的丰度,这是一种对澳大利亚中部土著居民非常重要的物种,面临灭绝的威胁。我们比较了两种实地调查方法:(1)系统调查,旨在重复、分层和标准化;(2)目标调查,侧重于兔耳袋狸标志存在的地区,采用更灵活和直观的搜索技术,与当地土著居民合作,并根据他们的知识和技能进行搜索。我们比较了两种方法的不同组合和不同的采样强度,以探索它们如何影响兔耳袋狸丰度的模型估计,该模型是通过将个体兔耳袋狸身份信息(从粪便中提取的DNA)与空间明确的捕获-再捕获模型相结合而得出的。我们发现,将有针对性的粪便收集方法与系统采样相结合,可以提供最佳的兔耳袋狸丰度模型估计,并且与增加系统采样相比,可以在降低总体工作量的情况下改进模型估计。这种方法也允许包含不同的知识和方法来检测物种(粪便)的存在。通过编织多种方法来发现和识别兔耳袋狸粪便,我们展示了协作知识共享实践如何也可以为土著和科学伙伴带来多重利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Integrating systematic and targeted scat collection approaches to estimate the abundance of a culturally significant threatened species on Indigenous lands

Integrating systematic and targeted scat collection approaches to estimate the abundance of a culturally significant threatened species on Indigenous lands

Estimating the abundance of threatened species can be extremely difficult. This is particularly true in remote regions, where surveys are often expensive and subject to logistical challenges. Where threatened species occur on Indigenous lands, collaborative work between Indigenous people and ecologists who share an interest in the conservation and management of these species may resolve some of these challenges while also meeting additional local objectives. Here, we show the value of integrating two on-ground methods for non-invasive genetic sampling of scat to estimate the abundance of the greater bilby (Macrotis lagotis), a species highly significant to Indigenous people of central Australia that is threatened with extinction. We compared two on-ground methods: (1) systematic surveys, designed to be repeatable, stratified, and standardized, and (2) targeted surveys, which focused on areas where bilby sign was present and involved a more flexible and intuitive search technique undertaken collaboratively with local Indigenous people and informed by their knowledge and skills. We compared different combinations of the two methods and different sampling intensities to explore how they affected modeled estimates of bilby abundance, derived by combining information on individual bilby identities (from DNA extracted from scat) with spatially explicit capture–recapture modeling. We found that combining targeted methods for scat collection with systematic sampling provided the best modeled estimates of bilby abundance and improved modeled estimates for lower overall effort than increasing systematic sampling. This approach also allowed for the inclusion of diverse knowledges and approaches to detecting species (scat) presence. By weaving multiple approaches to find and identify bilby scat, we show how collaborative knowledge-sharing practices can also deliver multiple benefits to Indigenous and science partners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信